Effectiveness of physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions in improving preterm infants' oral feeding ability in the NICU: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Jornal de pediatria Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jped.2024.06.014
Luh K Wahyuni, Irawan Mangunatmadja, Risma K Kaban, Elvie Zulka K Rachmawati, Rizky K Wardhani, Budiati Laksmitasari, Boya Nugraha
{"title":"Effectiveness of physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions in improving preterm infants' oral feeding ability in the NICU: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Luh K Wahyuni, Irawan Mangunatmadja, Risma K Kaban, Elvie Zulka K Rachmawati, Rizky K Wardhani, Budiati Laksmitasari, Boya Nugraha","doi":"10.1016/j.jped.2024.06.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to prove the effectiveness of physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions in terms of the duration needed to achieve the oral feeding ability of preterm infants in the NICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized clinical trial in five Neonatal intensive care units (NICU) was performed involving 70 preterm infants born at 28-34 weeks gestational age. Participants were allocated to 1) the experimental group (n = 39) received physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions, and 2) the control group (n = 31) received conventional swaddling and oromotor interventions. Mann-Whitney U analysis was used to determine the effectiveness of each group according to the duration needed to achieve oral feeding ability, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to compare the duration of both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group had a significantly shorter duration in achieving oral feeding ability [4 (1-15) vs. 7 (2-22) days; p = 0.02]. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that infants in the experimental group achieved full oral feeding ability earlier than those in the control group (15 vs. 22 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions have been proven to be effective in shortening the number of days needed to achieve the oral feeding ability of preterm infants in the NICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":14867,"journal":{"name":"Jornal de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2024.06.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to prove the effectiveness of physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions in terms of the duration needed to achieve the oral feeding ability of preterm infants in the NICU.

Methods: A randomized clinical trial in five Neonatal intensive care units (NICU) was performed involving 70 preterm infants born at 28-34 weeks gestational age. Participants were allocated to 1) the experimental group (n = 39) received physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions, and 2) the control group (n = 31) received conventional swaddling and oromotor interventions. Mann-Whitney U analysis was used to determine the effectiveness of each group according to the duration needed to achieve oral feeding ability, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to compare the duration of both groups.

Results: The experimental group had a significantly shorter duration in achieving oral feeding ability [4 (1-15) vs. 7 (2-22) days; p = 0.02]. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that infants in the experimental group achieved full oral feeding ability earlier than those in the control group (15 vs. 22 days).

Conclusions: Physiological flexion swaddling and oromotor interventions have been proven to be effective in shortening the number of days needed to achieve the oral feeding ability of preterm infants in the NICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生理性屈曲襁褓和口腔运动干预对提高新生儿重症监护室早产儿口腔喂养能力的效果:随机对照试验。
研究目的本研究旨在证明生理性屈曲襁褓和口腔运动干预对新生儿重症监护室早产儿达到口腔喂养能力所需时间的有效性:在五个新生儿重症监护室(NICU)进行了一项随机临床试验,共有 70 名胎龄 28-34 周的早产儿参加。参与者被分配到:1)实验组(39 人)接受生理屈曲襁褓和口运动干预;2)对照组(31 人)接受常规襁褓和口运动干预。根据达到口喂能力所需的持续时间,采用 Mann-Whitney U 分析法确定各组的有效性,同时采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析法比较两组的持续时间:结果:实验组达到口服喂养能力的时间明显更短[4 (1-15) 天 vs. 7 (2-22) 天;p = 0.02]。卡普兰-米尔生存曲线分析表明,实验组婴儿比对照组婴儿更早(15 天 vs. 22 天)完全具备口腔喂养能力:事实证明,生理屈曲襁褓和口腔运动干预能有效缩短新生儿重症监护室早产儿达到口腔喂养能力所需的天数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jornal de pediatria
Jornal de pediatria 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Jornal de Pediatria is a bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria, SBP). It has been published without interruption since 1934. Jornal de Pediatria publishes original articles and review articles covering various areas in the field of pediatrics. By publishing relevant scientific contributions, Jornal de Pediatria aims at improving the standards of pediatrics and of the healthcare provided for children and adolescents in general, as well to foster debate about health.
期刊最新文献
Climate change and children's health: resilience challenges for Brazil. Impact of air pollution and climate change on maternal, fetal and postnatal health. Neurodevelopment and climate change. Microplastics: the hidden danger. Spinal muscular atrophy in Brazil: from individual treatment to global management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1