Finding food: how generalist predators use contact-chemosensory information to guide prey preferences.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1242/jeb.247523
Richard K Zimmer, Graham A Ferrier, Cheryl A Zimmer
{"title":"Finding food: how generalist predators use contact-chemosensory information to guide prey preferences.","authors":"Richard K Zimmer, Graham A Ferrier, Cheryl A Zimmer","doi":"10.1242/jeb.247523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the processes that guide carnivores in finding and selecting prey is a fundamental, unresolved challenge in sensory biology. To our knowledge, no published work has yet revealed the complete structural identities of compounds that cue preferences by generalist predators for different prey species. With this research imperative in mind, we determined the chemistry driving consumer preferences for live intact prey using two generalist predatory species (sea stars, Pisaster ochraceus; whelks, Acanthinucella spirata), along with two foundation prey species (mussels, Mytilus californianus; barnacles, Balanus glandula), inhabiting rocky, wave-swept shores. Each prey species is known to secrete either a 29.6 kDa (named 'KEYSTONEin') or a 199.6 kDa (named 'MULTIFUNCin') glycoprotein as a contact-chemical cue. Here, experimental manipulations utilized faux prey consisting of cleaned barnacle or mussel shells infused with KEYSTONEin, MULTIFUNCin or seawater (control) gels. Whelks exhibited a strong penchant for MULTIFUNCin over KEYSTONEin, irrespective of shell type. In contrast, sea stars generally preferred KEYSTONEin over MULTIFUNCin, but this preference shifted depending on the experimental context in which they encountered physical (shell) and chemical (glycoprotein) stimuli. This study ultimately demonstrates clear and contrasting chemical preferences between sea stars and whelks. It highlights the importance of experimental setting in determining chemical preferences. Finally, it shows that prey preferences by these predators hinge only on one or two contact-protein cues, without the need for quality coding via fluid-borne compounds, low-molecular-weight substances or mixture blends.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.247523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the processes that guide carnivores in finding and selecting prey is a fundamental, unresolved challenge in sensory biology. To our knowledge, no published work has yet revealed the complete structural identities of compounds that cue preferences by generalist predators for different prey species. With this research imperative in mind, we determined the chemistry driving consumer preferences for live intact prey using two generalist predatory species (sea stars, Pisaster ochraceus; whelks, Acanthinucella spirata), along with two foundation prey species (mussels, Mytilus californianus; barnacles, Balanus glandula), inhabiting rocky, wave-swept shores. Each prey species is known to secrete either a 29.6 kDa (named 'KEYSTONEin') or a 199.6 kDa (named 'MULTIFUNCin') glycoprotein as a contact-chemical cue. Here, experimental manipulations utilized faux prey consisting of cleaned barnacle or mussel shells infused with KEYSTONEin, MULTIFUNCin or seawater (control) gels. Whelks exhibited a strong penchant for MULTIFUNCin over KEYSTONEin, irrespective of shell type. In contrast, sea stars generally preferred KEYSTONEin over MULTIFUNCin, but this preference shifted depending on the experimental context in which they encountered physical (shell) and chemical (glycoprotein) stimuli. This study ultimately demonstrates clear and contrasting chemical preferences between sea stars and whelks. It highlights the importance of experimental setting in determining chemical preferences. Finally, it shows that prey preferences by these predators hinge only on one or two contact-protein cues, without the need for quality coding via fluid-borne compounds, low-molecular-weight substances or mixture blends.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找食物:通食性捕食者如何利用接触化学感觉信息来引导猎物的喜好。
了解引导食肉动物发现和选择猎物的过程是感官生物学中一个基本的、尚未解决的挑战。据我们所知,目前还没有公开发表的研究成果揭示了引起食肉动物对不同猎物种类偏好的化合物的完整结构特性。考虑到这一研究需要,我们确定了消费者对活的、完整的猎物偏好的化学成分。本研究使用了栖息在波浪起伏的岩石海岸上的两种食肉动物(海星,Pisaster ochraceus;螺,Acanthinucella spirata)和两种基础猎物(贻贝,Mytilus californianus;藤壶,Balanus glandula)。已知每种猎物都会分泌 29.6 kDa(名为 "KEYSTONEIN")或 199.6 kDa(名为 "MULTIFUNCIN")糖蛋白作为接触化学线索。在这里,实验操作使用的假猎物是清洗过的藤壶或贻贝壳,其中注入了 KEYSTONEin、MULTIFUNCin 或海水(对照组)凝胶。螺类表现出对 MULTIFUNCin 的强烈偏好,而不是 KEYSTONEin,与贝壳类型无关。与此相反,海星通常更喜欢 KEYSTONEin 而不是 MULTIFUNCin,但这种偏好会随着它们遇到物理(贝壳)和化学(糖蛋白)刺激的实验环境而改变。这项研究最终证明了海星和海螺对化学物质的明显偏好。它强调了实验环境对确定化学偏好的重要性。最后,它还表明这些捕食者对猎物的偏好只取决于一到两种接触蛋白线索,而不需要通过液载化合物、低分子量物质或混合物进行质量编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
期刊最新文献
How do fish miss? Attack strategies of threespine stickleback capturing non-evasive prey. Hypertonic water reabsorption with a parallel-current system via the glandular and saccular renal tubules of Ruditapes philippinarum. Skittering locomotion in cricket frogs: a form of porpoising. Investigating in vivo force and work production of rat medial gastrocnemius at varying locomotor speeds using a muscle avatar. Bridging the divide in organismal physiology: a case for the integration of behaviour as a physiological process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1