Quasi-steady aerodynamic theory under-predicts glide performance in flying snakes.

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of Experimental Biology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1242/jeb.247989
Isaac J Yeaton, Shane D Ross, John J Socha
{"title":"Quasi-steady aerodynamic theory under-predicts glide performance in flying snakes.","authors":"Isaac J Yeaton, Shane D Ross, John J Socha","doi":"10.1242/jeb.247989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Flying snakes (genus Chrysopelea) glide without the use of wings. Instead, they splay their ribs and undulate through the air. A snake's ability to glide depends on how well its morphing wing-body produces lift and drag forces. However, previous kinematics experiments under-resolved the body, making it impossible to estimate the aerodynamic load on the animal or to quantify the different wing configurations throughout the glide. Here, we present new kinematic analyses of a previous glide experiment, and use the results to test a theoretical model of flying snake aerodynamics using previously measured lift and drag coefficients to estimate the aerodynamic forces. This analysis is enabled by new measurements of the center of mass motion based on experimental data. We found that quasi-steady aerodynamic theory under-predicts lift by 35% and over-predicts drag by 40%. We also quantified the relative spacing of the body as the snake translates through the air. In steep glides, the body is generally not positioned to experience tandem effects from wake interaction during the glide. These results suggest that unsteady 3D effects, with appreciable force enhancement, are important for snake flight. Future work can use the kinematics data presented herein to form test conditions for physical modeling, as well as computational studies to understand unsteady fluid dynamics effects on snake flight.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.247989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flying snakes (genus Chrysopelea) glide without the use of wings. Instead, they splay their ribs and undulate through the air. A snake's ability to glide depends on how well its morphing wing-body produces lift and drag forces. However, previous kinematics experiments under-resolved the body, making it impossible to estimate the aerodynamic load on the animal or to quantify the different wing configurations throughout the glide. Here, we present new kinematic analyses of a previous glide experiment, and use the results to test a theoretical model of flying snake aerodynamics using previously measured lift and drag coefficients to estimate the aerodynamic forces. This analysis is enabled by new measurements of the center of mass motion based on experimental data. We found that quasi-steady aerodynamic theory under-predicts lift by 35% and over-predicts drag by 40%. We also quantified the relative spacing of the body as the snake translates through the air. In steep glides, the body is generally not positioned to experience tandem effects from wake interaction during the glide. These results suggest that unsteady 3D effects, with appreciable force enhancement, are important for snake flight. Future work can use the kinematics data presented herein to form test conditions for physical modeling, as well as computational studies to understand unsteady fluid dynamics effects on snake flight.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
准稳态空气动力学理论对飞蛇的滑翔性能预测不足。
飞蛇(Chrysopelea 属)不用翅膀滑翔。相反,它们伸展肋骨,在空中起伏。蛇的滑翔能力取决于其变形翼身产生升力和阻力的能力。然而,以往的运动学实验对蛇体的分辨率较低,因此无法估算蛇体的空气动力负荷,也无法量化整个滑翔过程中不同的翅膀配置。在此,我们对之前的滑翔实验进行了新的运动学分析,并利用分析结果检验了飞蛇空气动力学理论模型,该模型使用之前测量的升力和阻力系数来估算空气动力。根据实验数据对质心运动进行的新测量使这一分析成为可能。我们发现,准稳态空气动力学理论对升力的预测低了 35%,对阻力的预测高了 40%。我们还量化了蛇在空中平移时身体的相对间距。在陡峭的滑行过程中,蛇身的位置一般不会受到尾流相互作用的串联效应。这些结果表明,不稳定的三维效应以及明显的力增强对蛇的飞行非常重要。未来的工作可以利用本文提供的运动学数据来形成物理建模的测试条件,并进行计算研究,以了解非稳定流体动力学对蛇类飞行的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
期刊最新文献
How do fish miss? Attack strategies of threespine stickleback capturing non-evasive prey. Hypertonic water reabsorption with a parallel-current system via the glandular and saccular renal tubules of Ruditapes philippinarum. Skittering locomotion in cricket frogs: a form of porpoising. Investigating in vivo force and work production of rat medial gastrocnemius at varying locomotor speeds using a muscle avatar. Bridging the divide in organismal physiology: a case for the integration of behaviour as a physiological process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1