Barriers and facilitators influencing referral and access to palliative care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a scoping review of the evidence.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1177/02692163241271010
Pru Holder, Lucy Coombes, Jane Chudleigh, Richard Harding, Lorna K Fraser
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators influencing referral and access to palliative care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a scoping review of the evidence.","authors":"Pru Holder, Lucy Coombes, Jane Chudleigh, Richard Harding, Lorna K Fraser","doi":"10.1177/02692163241271010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care is an essential component of children's health services but is accessed by fewer children than could potentially benefit.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Appraise the evidence to identify factors influencing referral and access to children's palliative care, and interventions to reduce barriers and improve referrals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review following the six stages of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Data were charted using an adapted version of the socioecological framework.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library were searched for primary studies of any design and literature/systematic reviews. Studies reporting barriers/facilitators and interventions in relation to referral of children with a life-limiting condition to palliative care, in any setting, were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety five articles (primary qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews) were retained (153 reporting barriers/facilitators; 40 interventions; 2 both). Multiple factors were identified as barriers/facilitators: Individual level: underlying diagnosis, prognostic uncertainty, parental attitudes, staff understanding/beliefs; Interpersonal level: family support, patient-provider relationships, interdisciplinary communication; Organisational level: referral protocols, workforce, leadership; Community level: cultural norms, community resources, geography; Society level: policies and legislation, national education, economic environment, medication availability. Most of these factors were bi-directional in terms of influence. Interventions (<i>n</i> = 42) were mainly at the organisational level for example, educational programmes, screening tools/guidelines, workplace champions and new/enhanced services; one-third of these were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Barriers/facilitators to paediatric palliative care referral are well described. Interventions are less well described and often unevaluated. Multi-modal approaches incorporating stakeholders from all levels of the socioecological framework are required to improve paediatric palliative care referral and access.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"981-999"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11491046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241271010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative care is an essential component of children's health services but is accessed by fewer children than could potentially benefit.

Aim: Appraise the evidence to identify factors influencing referral and access to children's palliative care, and interventions to reduce barriers and improve referrals.

Design: Scoping review following the six stages of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Data were charted using an adapted version of the socioecological framework.

Data sources: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library were searched for primary studies of any design and literature/systematic reviews. Studies reporting barriers/facilitators and interventions in relation to referral of children with a life-limiting condition to palliative care, in any setting, were included.

Results: One hundred ninety five articles (primary qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews) were retained (153 reporting barriers/facilitators; 40 interventions; 2 both). Multiple factors were identified as barriers/facilitators: Individual level: underlying diagnosis, prognostic uncertainty, parental attitudes, staff understanding/beliefs; Interpersonal level: family support, patient-provider relationships, interdisciplinary communication; Organisational level: referral protocols, workforce, leadership; Community level: cultural norms, community resources, geography; Society level: policies and legislation, national education, economic environment, medication availability. Most of these factors were bi-directional in terms of influence. Interventions (n = 42) were mainly at the organisational level for example, educational programmes, screening tools/guidelines, workplace champions and new/enhanced services; one-third of these were evaluated.

Conclusion: Barriers/facilitators to paediatric palliative care referral are well described. Interventions are less well described and often unevaluated. Multi-modal approaches incorporating stakeholders from all levels of the socioecological framework are required to improve paediatric palliative care referral and access.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响患有局限生命和危及生命疾病的儿童和青少年转诊和获得姑息关怀的障碍和促进因素:证据范围综述。
背景:姑息关怀是儿童健康服务的重要组成部分,但获得姑息关怀的儿童人数却少于潜在受益儿童人数。目的:评估证据以确定影响转诊和获得儿童姑息关怀的因素,以及减少障碍和改善转诊的干预措施:设计:按照Arksey和O'Malley框架的六个阶段进行范围审查。数据来源检索了 CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆的任何设计的主要研究和文献/系统综述。结果:共收录了 155 篇文章(其中包括:"在任何情况下"、"在任何情况下"、"在任何情况下"、"在任何情况下"、"在任何情况下"、"在任何情况下"):结果:共保留了 195 篇文章(主要定性和定量研究、综述)(153 篇报告了障碍/促进因素;40 篇报告了干预措施;2 篇报告了两者)。多种因素被确定为障碍/促进因素:个人层面:潜在诊断、预后的不确定性、家长态度、工作人员的理解/信念;人际层面:家庭支持、患者-医护人员关系、跨学科沟通;组织层面:转诊协议、劳动力、领导力;社区层面:文化规范、社区资源、地理;社会层面:政策和立法、国民教育、经济环境、药物供应。这些因素的影响大多是双向的。干预措施(n = 42)主要是在组织层面,例如教育计划、筛查工具/指南、工作场所倡导者和新的/强化服务;其中三分之一的干预措施得到了评估:结论:儿科姑息关怀转诊的障碍/促进因素已被充分描述。对干预措施的描述较少,通常也未进行评估。要改善儿科姑息关怀的转诊和获取,需要采取多种方式,将社会生态框架各个层面的利益相关者纳入其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of global patterns in reporting race, ethnicity, nationality, or religion in palliative care randomized controlled trials: Recommendations for transparency. Working with people living with motor neurone disease and the impact on professionals' emotional and psychological well-being: A scoping review. Feasibility and acceptability of the brief patient-reported experience measure consideRATE within the hospital setting for patients with palliative care needs, their families/carers and clinicians. Components of home-based palliative and supportive care for adults with heart failure: A scoping review. We need to talk about social class: Why theories of social class matter for understanding inequities in palliative and end-of-life care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1