The impact of genetic polymorphism for detecting genotoxicity in workers occupationally exposed to formaldehyde: A systematic review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Toxicology and Industrial Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1177/07482337241279894
Thiago Guedes Pinto, Ana Claudia Muniz Renno, Patricia Ramos Cury, Daniel Araki Ribeiro
{"title":"The impact of genetic polymorphism for detecting genotoxicity in workers occupationally exposed to formaldehyde: A systematic review.","authors":"Thiago Guedes Pinto, Ana Claudia Muniz Renno, Patricia Ramos Cury, Daniel Araki Ribeiro","doi":"10.1177/07482337241279894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Formaldehyde is a chemical compound capable of preserving cells and tissue morphology, being extensively used worldwide in industrial and medical processes. However, due to the many biological effects that take place after an individual is chronically exposed to formaldehyde, this compound poses a greater cancer risk for workers under its occupational exposure, even at lower concentrations. Thus, the present systematic review aimed to understand whether there may be a positive relation between polymorphism (in terms of individual susceptibility) and genotoxicity in individuals occupationally exposed to formaldehyde. For this purpose, a total of eight selected studies were carefully analyzed by two reviewers, who attributed scores to each study according to the used analysis parameters. First, all studies investigated either pathologists under formaldehyde exposure or anatomical laboratory pathology workers. In addition, the majority of studies were categorized as moderate or strong in the quality assessment. The results revealed a positive association between some polymorphism and genotoxicity in individuals exposed to formaldehyde, since more than half of the studies observed positive relations between genotoxicity and polymorphisms in xenobiotics metabolizing genes. We understand such parameters influence individuals' susceptibility to genomic damage induced by formaldehyde in peripheral blood. In conclusion, individuals with certain genotypes may show higher or lower DNA damage and/or lower or higher DNA repair potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":23171,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology and Industrial Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology and Industrial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07482337241279894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formaldehyde is a chemical compound capable of preserving cells and tissue morphology, being extensively used worldwide in industrial and medical processes. However, due to the many biological effects that take place after an individual is chronically exposed to formaldehyde, this compound poses a greater cancer risk for workers under its occupational exposure, even at lower concentrations. Thus, the present systematic review aimed to understand whether there may be a positive relation between polymorphism (in terms of individual susceptibility) and genotoxicity in individuals occupationally exposed to formaldehyde. For this purpose, a total of eight selected studies were carefully analyzed by two reviewers, who attributed scores to each study according to the used analysis parameters. First, all studies investigated either pathologists under formaldehyde exposure or anatomical laboratory pathology workers. In addition, the majority of studies were categorized as moderate or strong in the quality assessment. The results revealed a positive association between some polymorphism and genotoxicity in individuals exposed to formaldehyde, since more than half of the studies observed positive relations between genotoxicity and polymorphisms in xenobiotics metabolizing genes. We understand such parameters influence individuals' susceptibility to genomic damage induced by formaldehyde in peripheral blood. In conclusion, individuals with certain genotypes may show higher or lower DNA damage and/or lower or higher DNA repair potential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因多态性对检测职业接触甲醛工人的遗传毒性的影响:系统综述。
甲醛是一种能够保存细胞和组织形态的化合物,在全世界的工业和医疗过程中被广泛使用。然而,由于长期接触甲醛会对生物产生多种影响,因此,即使甲醛浓度较低,工人在职业接触甲醛的情况下也会面临较大的癌症风险。因此,本系统综述旨在了解职业暴露于甲醛的个体的多态性(个体易感性)与遗传毒性之间是否存在正相关关系。为此,两名审稿人对所选的八项研究进行了仔细分析,并根据所使用的分析参数为每项研究打分。首先,所有研究都调查了接触甲醛的病理学家或解剖实验室病理工作人员。此外,大多数研究在质量评估中被归类为中等或较高。研究结果表明,暴露于甲醛的个体的某些多态性与基因毒性之间存在正相关,因为半数以上的研究观察到基因毒性与异种生物代谢基因的多态性之间存在正相关。我们了解到,这些参数会影响个体对外周血中甲醛诱导的基因组损伤的易感性。总之,具有特定基因型的个体可能会表现出较高或较低的 DNA 损伤和/或较低或较高的 DNA 修复潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Toxicology & Industrial Health is a journal dedicated to reporting results of basic and applied toxicological research with direct application to industrial/occupational health. Such research includes the fields of genetic and cellular toxicology and risk assessment associated with hazardous wastes and groundwater.
期刊最新文献
Occupational exposure to arsenic and leukopenia risk: Toxicological alert. Perfluorooctane sulfonate causes damage to L-02 cells via Wnt/β-catenin signal path and endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway. The impact of genetic polymorphism for detecting genotoxicity in workers occupationally exposed to formaldehyde: A systematic review. Impact of xylene exposure during organogenesis on foeto-placental efficiency and foetal viability: Exploring its association with oxidative stress-induced inflammation and apoptosis in utero. Environmental exposure to lead and cadmium only minimally affects the redox system of the follicular fluid and the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1