Effectiveness of dry needling to treat lateral epicondylosis: A case report.

IF 0.6 Q4 REHABILITATION Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1177/17589983241268218
Nathan Short, Jill Linder, Ethan Stump
{"title":"Effectiveness of dry needling to treat lateral epicondylosis: A case report.","authors":"Nathan Short, Jill Linder, Ethan Stump","doi":"10.1177/17589983241268218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study presents the use of dry needling (DN) as an intervention to support functional rehabilitation for an adult diagnosed with lateral epicondylosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, single subject, AB design was implemented. A 50-year-old male with a six-month history of dominant left lateral epicondylosis received traditional interventions for 4 weeks (baseline phase; A) followed by the same interventions with the addition of DN (intervention phase; B). The QuickDASH assessment, numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, grip strength (elbow flexed and neutral), and Maudsley's test were used as measures of effectiveness along with patient self-report of ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLS), instrumental ADLs, work, and leisure occupations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient made minimal progress for the initial 4 weeks of traditional treatment. There were no changes to his initial pain rating of 7/10 on the NRS, left hand grip strength (67 lbs.), or initial QuickDASH score. DN was initiated at week five with a reduction in pain from 7/10 to 2/10 from weeks six to eight. He was discharged at week 12 with no pain, a score of 0/100 on the QuickDASH, non-painful grip of 83 lbs., and a self-report of the ability to perform all ADLs, instrumental ADLs, work, and leisure occupations independently.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dry needling appears to have been an effective intervention when integrated with a holistic approach for an individual with chronic lateral epicondylosis. More research is needed to evaluate dry needling as an intervention to support functional rehabilitation with a larger sample size and randomization.</p>","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"29 3","pages":"135-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983241268218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study presents the use of dry needling (DN) as an intervention to support functional rehabilitation for an adult diagnosed with lateral epicondylosis.

Methods: A retrospective, single subject, AB design was implemented. A 50-year-old male with a six-month history of dominant left lateral epicondylosis received traditional interventions for 4 weeks (baseline phase; A) followed by the same interventions with the addition of DN (intervention phase; B). The QuickDASH assessment, numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, grip strength (elbow flexed and neutral), and Maudsley's test were used as measures of effectiveness along with patient self-report of ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLS), instrumental ADLs, work, and leisure occupations.

Results: The patient made minimal progress for the initial 4 weeks of traditional treatment. There were no changes to his initial pain rating of 7/10 on the NRS, left hand grip strength (67 lbs.), or initial QuickDASH score. DN was initiated at week five with a reduction in pain from 7/10 to 2/10 from weeks six to eight. He was discharged at week 12 with no pain, a score of 0/100 on the QuickDASH, non-painful grip of 83 lbs., and a self-report of the ability to perform all ADLs, instrumental ADLs, work, and leisure occupations independently.

Conclusions: Dry needling appears to have been an effective intervention when integrated with a holistic approach for an individual with chronic lateral epicondylosis. More research is needed to evaluate dry needling as an intervention to support functional rehabilitation with a larger sample size and randomization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干针治疗外侧上髁病的疗效:病例报告。
目的:本研究介绍了干针疗法(DN)作为一种干预手段,对一名被诊断患有外侧上髁病的成人进行功能康复支持:方法:采用回顾性、单个受试者、AB 设计。一名 50 岁的男性患者有 6 个月的显性左侧外上髁病史,他接受了为期 4 周的传统干预(基线阶段;A),随后接受了同样的干预,并增加了干针疗法(干预阶段;B)。采用 QuickDASH 评估、疼痛数字评分量表 (NRS)、握力(肘部屈曲和中立)和莫兹利测试以及患者自我报告的日常生活能力 (ADLS)、工具性日常生活能力、工作和休闲职业能力来衡量疗效:患者在接受传统治疗的最初 4 周内进展甚微。最初的 NRS 疼痛评分(7/10)、左手握力(67 磅)或 QuickDASH 初始评分均无变化。第 5 周开始接受 DN 治疗,第 6-8 周疼痛从 7/10 减轻到 2/10。他在第 12 周出院时已无疼痛感,QuickDASH 评分为 0/100,握力为 83 磅,无疼痛感,自我报告称能独立完成所有日常活动、工具性日常活动、工作和休闲活动:干针疗法与整体疗法相结合,对慢性外侧上髁炎患者似乎是一种有效的干预方法。还需要进行更多的研究,以评估干针疗法作为一种支持功能康复的干预措施,并进行更多的样本量和随机化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Retrospective evaluation of allied health-led management of acute upper limb trauma. Cross-cultural adaptation and cognitive interview-based content validation of the English Participation Behaviour Questionnaire (PBQ), to measure participation in individuals with hand injuries. Investigation of the relationship between dominant hand abilities and hemispheric dominance. Wrist immobilisation of radial artery forearm flap (RAFF) donor site following split-thickness skin graft: A scoping review. Effects of home exercise-based mobile games on thumb rehabilitation outcomes mobile games on thumb rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1