Psychometric Evaluation of the Abdominal Bloating Social Support Scale.

IF 1.5 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.11
Nurzulaikha Abdullah, Yee Cheng Kueh, Garry Kuan, Mung Seong Wong, Yeong Yeh Lee
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Abdominal Bloating Social Support Scale.","authors":"Nurzulaikha Abdullah, Yee Cheng Kueh, Garry Kuan, Mung Seong Wong, Yeong Yeh Lee","doi":"10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal bloating (AB) is a common, bothersome symptom that negatively affects most adults. Although social support may help people suffering from AB, limited validated questionnaire is available. This study aimed to validate the newly developed Abdominal Bloating Social Support (SS-Bloat) scale for the Malaysian context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study in which we used purposive sampling and a self-administered questionnaire. Based on the literature review, experts' input and in-depth interviews, new items were generated for SS-Bloat scale. Content validity was assessed by experts and pre-tested with 30 individuals with AB. Construct validity was determined based on exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was determined based on Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability (CR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the development stage, eight items were generated for SS-Bloat scale and remained the same after content validity and pre-testing. A total of 152 participants with a mean age of 31.27 years old (68.3% female, 32.7% male) completed the questionnaire. Based on the EFA, three problematic items were removed. The total variance explained was 35.6% with acceptable reliability (α = 0.66). The model was then tested using CFA. The initial model did not fit the data well. After several model re-specifications, the final measurement model of SS-Bloat scale fit the data well with acceptable fit indices (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.994 and Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.984). The CR was satisfactory with value of 0.84.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SS-Bloat scale was deemed valid and reliable for assessing the level of social support among AB patients. The questionnaire can be useful for both research studies and clinical purposes, as it is easy to use.</p>","PeriodicalId":47388,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"31 4","pages":"138-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2024.31.4.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Abdominal bloating (AB) is a common, bothersome symptom that negatively affects most adults. Although social support may help people suffering from AB, limited validated questionnaire is available. This study aimed to validate the newly developed Abdominal Bloating Social Support (SS-Bloat) scale for the Malaysian context.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study in which we used purposive sampling and a self-administered questionnaire. Based on the literature review, experts' input and in-depth interviews, new items were generated for SS-Bloat scale. Content validity was assessed by experts and pre-tested with 30 individuals with AB. Construct validity was determined based on exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was determined based on Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability (CR).

Results: During the development stage, eight items were generated for SS-Bloat scale and remained the same after content validity and pre-testing. A total of 152 participants with a mean age of 31.27 years old (68.3% female, 32.7% male) completed the questionnaire. Based on the EFA, three problematic items were removed. The total variance explained was 35.6% with acceptable reliability (α = 0.66). The model was then tested using CFA. The initial model did not fit the data well. After several model re-specifications, the final measurement model of SS-Bloat scale fit the data well with acceptable fit indices (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.994 and Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.984). The CR was satisfactory with value of 0.84.

Conclusion: SS-Bloat scale was deemed valid and reliable for assessing the level of social support among AB patients. The questionnaire can be useful for both research studies and clinical purposes, as it is easy to use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹胀社会支持量表的心理计量学评估
背景:腹胀(AB)是一种常见的令人烦恼的症状,对大多数成年人都有负面影响。虽然社会支持可以帮助腹胀患者,但现有的有效问卷却很有限。本研究旨在针对马来西亚的情况验证新开发的腹胀社会支持量表(SS-Bloat):我们进行了一项横断面研究,采用了目的性抽样和自填式问卷。根据文献综述、专家意见和深入访谈,为腹胀量表设计了新的项目。内容效度由专家评估,并在 30 名 AB 患者中进行了预测试。结构效度是根据探索性因子分析(EFA)和确认性因子分析(CFA)确定的。信度根据克朗巴赫α和综合信度(CR)确定:在开发阶段,SS-Bloat 量表产生了 8 个项目,经过内容效度和预测试后,这些项目保持不变。共有 152 名参与者填写了问卷,平均年龄为 31.27 岁(68.3% 为女性,32.7% 为男性)。根据 EFA,删除了三个有问题的项目。解释的总方差为 35.6%,信度可接受(α = 0.66)。然后使用 CFA 对模型进行了检验。最初的模型不能很好地拟合数据。在对模型进行多次重新规范后,SS-Bloat 量表的最终测量模型与数据拟合良好,拟合指数(比较拟合指数[CFI] = 0.994 和塔克-刘易斯指数[TLI] = 0.984)可以接受。CR 值为 0.84,令人满意:SS-Bloat量表在评估AB患者的社会支持水平方面被认为是有效和可靠的。该问卷易于使用,可用于研究和临床目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, fully online journal that is published at least six times a year. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of medical sciences including biomedical, allied health, clinical and social sciences. We accept high quality papers from basic to translational research especially from low & middle income countries, as classified by the United Nations & World Bank (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/ articles/906519), with the aim that published research will benefit back the bottom billion population from these countries. Manuscripts submitted from developed or high income countries to MJMS must contain data and information that will benefit the socio-health and bio-medical sciences of these low and middle income countries. The MJMS editorial board consists of internationally regarded clinicians and scientists from low and middle income countries.
期刊最新文献
A Narrative Review on Mobile Health (mHealth) App for Stroke Care and Rehabilitation Intervention for Malaysia. Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel, as an Ion Channel in Therapeutics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Trends (1984-2023). The Relationship Between Comprehensive OSCE Scores and GPA on the Readiness of Undergraduate Medical Students to Undergo Clinical Rotations. Time to Readmission and Its Prognostic Factors among Hospitalised Heart Failure Patients. A Two-Sample Analysis of the Construct Validity and Temporal Stability of a Process-Oriented Measure of Exercise Habit Strength.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1