Profiles of nonverbal skills used by young pre-verbal children with autism on the ADOS-2: Relation to screening disposition and outcomes

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Autism Research Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1002/aur.3229
Lisa R. Hamrick, Rosmary Ros-Demarize, Stephen Kanne, Laura Arnstein Carpenter
{"title":"Profiles of nonverbal skills used by young pre-verbal children with autism on the ADOS-2: Relation to screening disposition and outcomes","authors":"Lisa R. Hamrick,&nbsp;Rosmary Ros-Demarize,&nbsp;Stephen Kanne,&nbsp;Laura Arnstein Carpenter","doi":"10.1002/aur.3229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Autistic individuals exhibit differences in their use and understanding of nonverbal communication; however, individual patterns of nonverbal strengths and challenges vary significantly. This heterogeneity can complicate the diagnostic and screening processes and can result in delayed or missed diagnoses. In this study, we characterize various profiles of nonverbal communication skills among 215 pre-verbal children with autism (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 36.27 months, range = 18–70) and explore how these profiles are related to screening outcomes, diagnostic certainty, and developmental and behavioral features. We conducted a latent class analysis of nine items assessing nonverbal communication skills from the Toddler Module and Module 1 of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd Edition. Five nonverbal profiles were identified that differentiated children based on the form, function, and frequency of their nonverbal communication skills. Furthermore, screening outcomes and clinician certainty in autism diagnosis varied by nonverbal profile. False negative screening outcomes based on parent report were highest for children who used a range of nonverbal skills but with limited frequency or consistency. Clinicians, on the other hand, tended to have high certainty in an autism diagnosis for children with this profile, and instead rated their lowest certainty in diagnosing children who demonstrated consistent integration of eye contact with their nonverbal communication. The profiles identified in this study could be clinically useful in helping to identify children at highest likelihood of being overlooked during the screening or diagnostic processes, providing an opportunity to improve early identification and intervention for autism.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"17 11","pages":"2370-2385"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.3229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autistic individuals exhibit differences in their use and understanding of nonverbal communication; however, individual patterns of nonverbal strengths and challenges vary significantly. This heterogeneity can complicate the diagnostic and screening processes and can result in delayed or missed diagnoses. In this study, we characterize various profiles of nonverbal communication skills among 215 pre-verbal children with autism (Mage = 36.27 months, range = 18–70) and explore how these profiles are related to screening outcomes, diagnostic certainty, and developmental and behavioral features. We conducted a latent class analysis of nine items assessing nonverbal communication skills from the Toddler Module and Module 1 of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, 2nd Edition. Five nonverbal profiles were identified that differentiated children based on the form, function, and frequency of their nonverbal communication skills. Furthermore, screening outcomes and clinician certainty in autism diagnosis varied by nonverbal profile. False negative screening outcomes based on parent report were highest for children who used a range of nonverbal skills but with limited frequency or consistency. Clinicians, on the other hand, tended to have high certainty in an autism diagnosis for children with this profile, and instead rated their lowest certainty in diagnosing children who demonstrated consistent integration of eye contact with their nonverbal communication. The profiles identified in this study could be clinically useful in helping to identify children at highest likelihood of being overlooked during the screening or diagnostic processes, providing an opportunity to improve early identification and intervention for autism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症儿童在 ADOS-2 中使用的非语言技能概况:与筛查倾向和结果的关系。
自闭症患者在使用和理解非语言交流方面表现出差异;然而,个体在非语言交流方面的优势和挑战也大相径庭。这种异质性会使诊断和筛查过程复杂化,并可能导致诊断延迟或漏诊。在本研究中,我们描述了 215 名患有自闭症的前语言沟通能力儿童(年龄 = 36.27 个月,范围 = 18-70)的各种非语言沟通能力特征,并探讨了这些特征与筛查结果、诊断确定性以及发育和行为特征之间的关系。我们对自闭症诊断观察表(第二版)幼儿模块和模块 1 中评估非语言沟通技能的九个项目进行了潜类分析。根据儿童非语言沟通技能的形式、功能和频率,确定了五种非语言特征。此外,筛查结果和临床医生对自闭症诊断的确定性也因非语言特征而异。根据家长报告,使用一系列非语言技能但频率或一致性有限的儿童的假阴性筛查结果最高。另一方面,临床医生往往对具有这种特征的儿童的自闭症诊断具有较高的确定性,而对那些在非言语交流中持续融入眼神交流的儿童的诊断确定性最低。本研究发现的特征可能对临床有用,有助于识别在筛查或诊断过程中最有可能被忽视的儿童,为改善自闭症的早期识别和干预提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Parental age at birth, telomere length, and autism spectrum disorders in the UK Biobank cohort Regional differences in autism and intellectual disability risk associated with cesarean section delivery Issue Information Expanding perspectives on figurative language processing in autism spectrum disorder: A commentary on Lampri et al.'s review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1