Endogenous dynamics of denunciation: Evidence from an inquisitorial trial.

IF 2.2 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PNAS nexus Pub Date : 2024-08-21 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae340
José Luis Estévez, Davor Salihović, Stoyan V Sgourev
{"title":"Endogenous dynamics of denunciation: Evidence from an inquisitorial trial.","authors":"José Luis Estévez, Davor Salihović, Stoyan V Sgourev","doi":"10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We develop an endogenous approach to the practice of denunciation, as an alternative to exogenous historical and sociological accounts. It analyzes denunciation as a response to increasing pressure, which in turn increases pressure on social contacts. The research context is the trial of Waldensians in Giaveno, Italy, in 1335, headed by the inquisitor Alberto de Castellario. A dynamic network actor model attests that coercive pressure not only raises the rate of denunciation but also compels denouncers to implicate individuals who are socially closer to them. We find that coercive pressure starts yielding diminishing returns relatively quickly, with the degree of redundancy of information escalating as a result of preferential attachment, increasingly targeting those already denounced by others, publicly announced suspects, and those having absconded from the trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":74468,"journal":{"name":"PNAS nexus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PNAS nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We develop an endogenous approach to the practice of denunciation, as an alternative to exogenous historical and sociological accounts. It analyzes denunciation as a response to increasing pressure, which in turn increases pressure on social contacts. The research context is the trial of Waldensians in Giaveno, Italy, in 1335, headed by the inquisitor Alberto de Castellario. A dynamic network actor model attests that coercive pressure not only raises the rate of denunciation but also compels denouncers to implicate individuals who are socially closer to them. We find that coercive pressure starts yielding diminishing returns relatively quickly, with the degree of redundancy of information escalating as a result of preferential attachment, increasingly targeting those already denounced by others, publicly announced suspects, and those having absconded from the trial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
告发的内生动力:来自审问式审判的证据。
我们对告密行为提出了一种内生方法,以替代外生的历史和社会学描述。它将告发分析为对日益增长的压力的反应,而压力的增加又反过来增加了社会联系的压力。研究背景是 1335 年在意大利吉亚韦诺由宗教裁判官阿尔贝托-德-卡斯特里奥领导的对瓦尔登派教徒的审判。一个动态网络行为者模型证明,胁迫性压力不仅会提高告发率,还会迫使告发者牵连到与其社会关系更密切的人。我们发现,胁迫性压力很快就会导致收益递减,信息冗余的程度会因优先依附关系而升级,越来越多地针对那些已被他人告发的人、公开宣布的嫌疑人以及从审判中潜逃的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pollen foraging mediates exposure to dichotomous stressor syndromes in honey bees. Affective polarization is uniformly distributed across American States. Attraction to politically extreme users on social media. Critical thinking and misinformation vulnerability: experimental evidence from Colombia. Descriptive norms can "backfire" in hyper-polarized contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1