Differential utilization of thyroid lobectomy after the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline update.

Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) Pub Date : 2024-09-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1530/EO-24-0010
Patricia Gina Lu, Zhi Ven Fong, Patrick T Hangge, Yu-Hui Chang, Elisabeth S Lim, Nabil Wasif, Patricia A Cronin, Chee-Chee Stucky
{"title":"Differential utilization of thyroid lobectomy after the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline update.","authors":"Patricia Gina Lu, Zhi Ven Fong, Patrick T Hangge, Yu-Hui Chang, Elisabeth S Lim, Nabil Wasif, Patricia A Cronin, Chee-Chee Stucky","doi":"10.1530/EO-24-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines added thyroid lobectomy (TL) as the appropriate treatment for low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). We aimed to investigate the population-level factors that influence the utilization of TL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried for all DTC patients fitting low-risk criteria as defined by the ATA. Trends in total thyroidectomy (TT) and TL were identified using a Cochrane-Armitage test. Multivariable logistic regression identified patient and socioeconomic characteristics associated with TL, and difference-in-difference analysis was used to control for secular trends over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43,526 patients with low-risk DTC were identified in the SEER database; 39,411 pre-2015 and 4115 post-2015. After 2015, TT continued to outnumber TL (76.2% vs 23.8%), although the rate of TL increased significantly (11.6% to 23.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). However, difference-in-difference analysis found that age > 55 (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.19, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and rurality (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were independently associated with TT. TL was associated with T1 disease (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.19, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the 2015 ATA guideline update led to an increase in TL for low-risk DTC, most patients still underwent TT. Age and neighborhood significantly impact the odds of receiving guideline-appropriate TL for low-risk DTC, especially for T2 disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":72907,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","volume":"4 1","pages":"e240010"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EO-24-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines added thyroid lobectomy (TL) as the appropriate treatment for low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). We aimed to investigate the population-level factors that influence the utilization of TL.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried for all DTC patients fitting low-risk criteria as defined by the ATA. Trends in total thyroidectomy (TT) and TL were identified using a Cochrane-Armitage test. Multivariable logistic regression identified patient and socioeconomic characteristics associated with TL, and difference-in-difference analysis was used to control for secular trends over time.

Results: A total of 43,526 patients with low-risk DTC were identified in the SEER database; 39,411 pre-2015 and 4115 post-2015. After 2015, TT continued to outnumber TL (76.2% vs 23.8%), although the rate of TL increased significantly (11.6% to 23.8%, P < 0.001). However, difference-in-difference analysis found that age > 55 (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.19, P < 0.001) and rurality (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05-1.28, P < 0.001) were independently associated with TT. TL was associated with T1 disease (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.19, P = 0.001).

Conclusion: Although the 2015 ATA guideline update led to an increase in TL for low-risk DTC, most patients still underwent TT. Age and neighborhood significantly impact the odds of receiving guideline-appropriate TL for low-risk DTC, especially for T2 disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015年美国甲状腺协会指南更新后甲状腺叶切除术的使用差异。
背景:2015年美国甲状腺协会(ATA)指南增加了甲状腺叶切除术(TL)作为低风险分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)的适当治疗方法。我们旨在调查影响TL使用率的人群水平因素:我们在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中查询了所有符合 ATA 定义的低风险标准的 DTC 患者。采用Cochrane-Armitage检验确定了甲状腺全切除术(TT)和TL的趋势。多变量逻辑回归确定了与TL相关的患者和社会经济特征,并使用差异分析控制了随时间变化的世俗趋势:SEER数据库共识别出43526名低风险DTC患者;2015年前为39411人,2015年后为4115人。2015 年后,TT 患者的数量继续超过 TL 患者(76.2% 对 23.8%),但 TL 的比例显著增加(11.6% 升至 23.8%,P < 0.001)。然而,差异分析发现,年龄大于 55 岁(OR 1.11,95% CI 1.01-1.19,P<0.001)和农村地区(OR 1.16,95% CI 1.05-1.28,P<0.001)与 TT 独立相关。TL与T1疾病相关(OR 1.11,95% CI 1.04-1.19,P = 0.001):尽管2015年ATA指南更新导致低风险DTC的TL增加,但大多数患者仍接受了TT。年龄和邻里关系对低风险 DTC(尤其是 T2 疾病)接受指南适当的 TL 的几率有很大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Aripiprazole use as a cause of dopamine agonist failure in the treatment of prolactinomas. A rare case of bladder paraganglioma treated successfully with robotic partial cystectomy. Expression of MMP-2, MMP-9 and TIMP-2 in pituitary tumors and their relationship with cavernous sinus invasion. Everything you ever wanted to know about cancer stem cells in neuroendocrine neoplasms but were afraid to ask. NET Models Meeting 2024 white paper: the current state of neuroendocrine tumour research models and our future aspirations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1