Equivalent conversion of different multiaxial stress rupture criteria for creep materials based on skeletal point stresses

IF 4.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS Engineering Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110439
{"title":"Equivalent conversion of different multiaxial stress rupture criteria for creep materials based on skeletal point stresses","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Multiaxial creep life prediction of components has been challenging. To cope with the challenge, efforts have been made to develop suitable multiaxial stress rupture criteria (MSRC) based on representative stress concept. Of all MSRCs, the ones due to Sdobyrev and Hayhurst-Leckie (denoted as SHL MSRC), and to Cane (denoted as Cane MSRC) are commonly-used. In this work, the equivalent conversion between the SHL MSRC and the Cane MSRC is investigated based on skeletal point stresses. Equivalent conversion formulae are proposed based on the skeletal point stresses of circumferentially-notched tension (CNT) specimen, and then validated by comparison with the experimental data available in the literature. The equivalent conversion formula between the two MSRCs is found to be dependent on the signs of principal stresses. Therefore, different conversion formulae should be chosen depending on the signs of principal stresses. Afterwards, the applicability of different equivalent conversion formulae is demonstrated for the CNT specimen when skeletal point stresses are available, and for creep crack growth specimen when skeletal point stresses are not available. Finally, the equivalence of the two MSRCs is discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424006027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiaxial creep life prediction of components has been challenging. To cope with the challenge, efforts have been made to develop suitable multiaxial stress rupture criteria (MSRC) based on representative stress concept. Of all MSRCs, the ones due to Sdobyrev and Hayhurst-Leckie (denoted as SHL MSRC), and to Cane (denoted as Cane MSRC) are commonly-used. In this work, the equivalent conversion between the SHL MSRC and the Cane MSRC is investigated based on skeletal point stresses. Equivalent conversion formulae are proposed based on the skeletal point stresses of circumferentially-notched tension (CNT) specimen, and then validated by comparison with the experimental data available in the literature. The equivalent conversion formula between the two MSRCs is found to be dependent on the signs of principal stresses. Therefore, different conversion formulae should be chosen depending on the signs of principal stresses. Afterwards, the applicability of different equivalent conversion formulae is demonstrated for the CNT specimen when skeletal point stresses are available, and for creep crack growth specimen when skeletal point stresses are not available. Finally, the equivalence of the two MSRCs is discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于骨架点应力的蠕变材料不同多轴应力断裂标准的等效转换
部件的多轴蠕变寿命预测一直是一项挑战。为了应对这一挑战,人们一直在努力开发基于代表性应力概念的合适的多轴应力断裂准则(MSRC)。在所有 MSRC 中,Sdobyrev 和 Hayhurst-Leckie 提出的 MSRC(简称为 SHL MSRC)以及 Cane 提出的 MSRC(简称为 Cane MSRC)最为常用。在这项工作中,研究了基于骨骼点应力的 SHL MSRC 和 Cane MSRC 之间的等效转换。根据圆周缺口拉伸(CNT)试样的骨架点应力提出了等效换算公式,并通过与文献中的实验数据进行对比进行了验证。结果发现,两种 MSRC 之间的等效转换公式取决于主应力的符号。因此,应根据主应力的符号选择不同的转换公式。随后,针对有骨架点应力的 CNT 试样和无骨架点应力的蠕变裂纹生长试样,证明了不同等效换算公式的适用性。最后,讨论了两种 MSRC 的等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A novel experimental method for studying rock collision Crystal plasticity-driven evaluation of notch fatigue behavior in IN718 Research on the microstructure, mechanical and fatigue performance of 7075/6061 dissimilar aluminum alloy fusion welding joint treated by nanoparticle and post-weld heat treatment Strain-gradient and damage failure behavior in particle reinforced heterogeneous matrix composites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1