{"title":"A Theory of Inaccessible Information","authors":"Jacopo Surace","doi":"10.22331/q-2024-09-09-1464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What would be the consequences if there were fundamental limits to our ability to experimentally explore the world? In this work we seriously consider this question. We assume the existence of statements whose truth value is not experimentally accessible. That is, there is no way, not even in theory, to directly test if these statements are true or false. We further develop a theory in which experimentally accessible statements are a union of a fixed minimum number of inaccessible statements. For example, the value of truth of the statements \"a\" and \"b\" is not accessible, but the value of truth of the statement \"a or b\" is accessible. We do not directly assume probability theory, we exclusively define experimentally accessible and inaccessible statements and build on these notions using the rules of classical logic. We find that an interesting structure emerges. Developing this theory, we relax the logical structure to a probabilistic one, obtaining a theory rich in structure that we call \"theory of inaccessible information\". Surprisingly, the simplest model of theory of inaccessible information is the qubit in quantum mechanics. Along the path for the construction of this theory, we characterise and study a family of multiplicative information measures that we call \"inaccessibility measures\".","PeriodicalId":20807,"journal":{"name":"Quantum","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantum","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-09-09-1464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
What would be the consequences if there were fundamental limits to our ability to experimentally explore the world? In this work we seriously consider this question. We assume the existence of statements whose truth value is not experimentally accessible. That is, there is no way, not even in theory, to directly test if these statements are true or false. We further develop a theory in which experimentally accessible statements are a union of a fixed minimum number of inaccessible statements. For example, the value of truth of the statements "a" and "b" is not accessible, but the value of truth of the statement "a or b" is accessible. We do not directly assume probability theory, we exclusively define experimentally accessible and inaccessible statements and build on these notions using the rules of classical logic. We find that an interesting structure emerges. Developing this theory, we relax the logical structure to a probabilistic one, obtaining a theory rich in structure that we call "theory of inaccessible information". Surprisingly, the simplest model of theory of inaccessible information is the qubit in quantum mechanics. Along the path for the construction of this theory, we characterise and study a family of multiplicative information measures that we call "inaccessibility measures".
如果我们在实验中探索世界的能力受到根本限制,会产生什么后果?在这项工作中,我们认真考虑了这个问题。我们假设存在一些无法通过实验获得其真值的语句。也就是说,我们甚至在理论上都无法直接检验这些语句的真假。我们进一步发展了一种理论,在这种理论中,实验上可获取的语句是固定的最少数量的不可获取语句的结合。例如,"a "和 "b "语句的真值是不可获取的,但 "a 或 b "语句的真值是可获取的。我们并不直接假设概率论,我们只定义了实验中可访问和不可访问的语句,并使用经典逻辑规则在这些概念的基础上进行构建。我们发现出现了一个有趣的结构。在发展这一理论的过程中,我们将逻辑结构放宽为概率结构,从而获得了一种结构丰富的理论,我们称之为 "不可获取信息理论"。令人惊讶的是,不可获取信息理论的最简单模型就是量子力学中的量子比特。在构建这一理论的过程中,我们描述并研究了一系列乘法信息度量,我们称之为 "不可获取度量"。
QuantumPhysics and Astronomy-Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍:
Quantum is an open-access peer-reviewed journal for quantum science and related fields. Quantum is non-profit and community-run: an effort by researchers and for researchers to make science more open and publishing more transparent and efficient.