Sex differences in the outcome of critically Ill patients with COVID-19 - An international multicenter critical care consortium study

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart & Lung Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.09.001
{"title":"Sex differences in the outcome of critically Ill patients with COVID-19 - An international multicenter critical care consortium study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sex differences in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) susceptibility, illness severity, and hospital course are widely acknowledged. The effects of sex on outcomes experienced by patients with severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine the effects of sex on ICU mortality in patients with COVID-19</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective analysis of an international multi-center prospective observational database included adults admitted to ICU for treatment of acute COVID-19 between 1st January 2020 and 30th June 2022. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Multivariable Cox regression was used to ascertain the hazard of death (Hazard Ratio=HR) adjusted for pre-selected covariates. The secondary outcome was sex differences in complications of COVID-19 during hospital stay.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 10,259 patients (3,314 females, 6,945 males) were included with a median age of 60 (interquartile range [IQR]=49–68) and 59 (IQR=49–67) years, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between sexes. More females were non-smokers (65% vs. 44 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and obese (39% vs. 30 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), compared to males. Also, males received greater ICU intervention (mechanical ventilation, prone ventilation, vasopressors, and tracheostomy) than females. Males had a greater hazard of death (compared to females, HR=1.14; 95 % CI=1.02–1.26). Adjustment for complications during hospital stay did not alter the hazard of death (HR=1.16; 95 % CI=1.05–1.28). Males had a significantly elevated hazard of death among patients who received ECMO (HR=1.24; 95 % CI=1.01–1.53). Male sex was associated with cardiac arrest (adjusted OR [aOR]=1.37; 95 % CI=1.16–1.62) and PE (aOR=1.28; 95 % CI=1.06–1.55).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among patients admitted to ICU for severe COVID-19, males experienced higher severity of illness and more frequent intervention than females. Ultimately, the hazard of death was moderately elevated in males compared to females despite greater PE and cardiac arrest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324001602/pdfft?md5=2bb3d4feb84a5337323b3a081a70f8ef&pid=1-s2.0-S0147956324001602-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324001602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sex differences in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) susceptibility, illness severity, and hospital course are widely acknowledged. The effects of sex on outcomes experienced by patients with severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unknown.

Objectives

To determine the effects of sex on ICU mortality in patients with COVID-19

Methods

This retrospective analysis of an international multi-center prospective observational database included adults admitted to ICU for treatment of acute COVID-19 between 1st January 2020 and 30th June 2022. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Multivariable Cox regression was used to ascertain the hazard of death (Hazard Ratio=HR) adjusted for pre-selected covariates. The secondary outcome was sex differences in complications of COVID-19 during hospital stay.

Results

Overall, 10,259 patients (3,314 females, 6,945 males) were included with a median age of 60 (interquartile range [IQR]=49–68) and 59 (IQR=49–67) years, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between sexes. More females were non-smokers (65% vs. 44 %, p < 0.01) and obese (39% vs. 30 %, p < 0.01), compared to males. Also, males received greater ICU intervention (mechanical ventilation, prone ventilation, vasopressors, and tracheostomy) than females. Males had a greater hazard of death (compared to females, HR=1.14; 95 % CI=1.02–1.26). Adjustment for complications during hospital stay did not alter the hazard of death (HR=1.16; 95 % CI=1.05–1.28). Males had a significantly elevated hazard of death among patients who received ECMO (HR=1.24; 95 % CI=1.01–1.53). Male sex was associated with cardiac arrest (adjusted OR [aOR]=1.37; 95 % CI=1.16–1.62) and PE (aOR=1.28; 95 % CI=1.06–1.55).

Conclusion

Among patients admitted to ICU for severe COVID-19, males experienced higher severity of illness and more frequent intervention than females. Ultimately, the hazard of death was moderately elevated in males compared to females despite greater PE and cardiac arrest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 重症患者预后的性别差异 - 一项国际多中心重症监护联盟研究
背景严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)易感性、疾病严重程度和住院过程中的性别差异已得到广泛认可。目标确定性别对 COVID-19 患者 ICU 死亡率的影响方法对国际多中心前瞻性观察数据库进行回顾性分析,纳入 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间因急性 COVID-19 而入住 ICU 治疗的成人。主要结果是ICU死亡率。采用多变量 Cox 回归确定死亡风险(危险比=HR),并对预选协变量进行调整。次要结果是住院期间COVID-19并发症的性别差异。结果总计纳入了10259名患者(女性3314人,男性6945人),中位年龄分别为60岁(四分位距[IQR]=49-68)和59岁(IQR=49-67)。男女的基线特征相似。与男性相比,更多的女性不吸烟(65% 对 44%,p < 0.01)和肥胖(39% 对 30%,p < 0.01)。此外,与女性相比,男性接受的重症监护干预(机械通气、俯卧位通气、血管加压和气管切开术)更多。男性的死亡风险更高(与女性相比,HR=1.14;95 % CI=1.02-1.26)。住院期间并发症的调整并未改变死亡风险(HR=1.16;95 % CI=1.05-1.28)。在接受 ECMO 的患者中,男性的死亡风险明显升高(HR=1.24;95 % CI=1.01-1.53)。男性性别与心脏骤停(调整后 OR [aOR]=1.37; 95 % CI=1.16-1.62 )和 PE(aOR=1.28; 95 % CI=1.06-1.55)相关。最终,尽管PE和心脏骤停的发生率较高,但男性的死亡风险略高于女性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart & Lung
Heart & Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
184
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders. The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes following aortic valve replacement in bioprosthetic vs mechanical valves. Effects of intubation and hypoxemia on intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants during the first week: An observational study. Association between diet-derived antioxidants and asthma: Insights from the NHANES survey 2003-2018 and Mendelian randomization analysis. Effectiveness and safety of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis The effects of exercise-based prehabilitation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1