Efficacy of superficial femoral artery as a recipient in free flap reconstruction around the knee: Four case reports and a literature review

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY JPRAS Open Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jpra.2024.08.001
Mitsutoshi Ota , Makoto Motomiya , Naoya Watanabe , Kazuya Kitaguchi , Norimasa Iwasaki
{"title":"Efficacy of superficial femoral artery as a recipient in free flap reconstruction around the knee: Four case reports and a literature review","authors":"Mitsutoshi Ota ,&nbsp;Makoto Motomiya ,&nbsp;Naoya Watanabe ,&nbsp;Kazuya Kitaguchi ,&nbsp;Norimasa Iwasaki","doi":"10.1016/j.jpra.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Reconstructing soft tissue defects around the knee with free flaps presents challenges in recipient vessel selection. Although the superficial femoral artery (SFA) offers exposure ease and anatomical stability, concerns arise regarding its distance from the defect site, difficulty in performing anastomosis and potential peripheral ischaemia. This study aimed to reassess the suitability of SFA as a recipient vessel for knee reconstructions by examining our cases and those from previous reports.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed four cases of knee soft tissue defects reconstructed with free flaps using the SFA, detailing surgical techniques and outcomes. Additionally, a comprehensive literature search was conducted for articles on using SFA as a recipient vessel for knee free flaps, using PubMed, Web of Science and EBSCOhost databases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all four cases, latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps were used, with end-to-side anastomosis performed using a large slit-shaped arteriotomy. All flaps demonstrated successful survival without complications. Our analysis included 85 cases, comprising four of our cases and 81 cases from 16 articles. Sarcoma resection was the most common aetiology, followed by total knee prosthesis-related defects, trauma and osteomyelitis. Complete flap necrosis occurred in 5% of cases. The LD flap was the predominant choice, alongside other long-pedicle flaps. The SFA provided coverage for all knee areas except the distal lateral patellar region.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite the limited evidence, the SFA appears to be a reliable recipient vessel for knee soft tissue reconstruction. Comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of the SFA and flaps used enhances the safety and efficacy of soft tissue defect reconstruction around the knee.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37996,"journal":{"name":"JPRAS Open","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 81-96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001232/pdfft?md5=84a0c459084f3b6a18eff074bda745ae&pid=1-s2.0-S2352587824001232-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPRAS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587824001232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Reconstructing soft tissue defects around the knee with free flaps presents challenges in recipient vessel selection. Although the superficial femoral artery (SFA) offers exposure ease and anatomical stability, concerns arise regarding its distance from the defect site, difficulty in performing anastomosis and potential peripheral ischaemia. This study aimed to reassess the suitability of SFA as a recipient vessel for knee reconstructions by examining our cases and those from previous reports.

Methods

We reviewed four cases of knee soft tissue defects reconstructed with free flaps using the SFA, detailing surgical techniques and outcomes. Additionally, a comprehensive literature search was conducted for articles on using SFA as a recipient vessel for knee free flaps, using PubMed, Web of Science and EBSCOhost databases.

Results

In all four cases, latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps were used, with end-to-side anastomosis performed using a large slit-shaped arteriotomy. All flaps demonstrated successful survival without complications. Our analysis included 85 cases, comprising four of our cases and 81 cases from 16 articles. Sarcoma resection was the most common aetiology, followed by total knee prosthesis-related defects, trauma and osteomyelitis. Complete flap necrosis occurred in 5% of cases. The LD flap was the predominant choice, alongside other long-pedicle flaps. The SFA provided coverage for all knee areas except the distal lateral patellar region.

Conclusion

Despite the limited evidence, the SFA appears to be a reliable recipient vessel for knee soft tissue reconstruction. Comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of the SFA and flaps used enhances the safety and efficacy of soft tissue defect reconstruction around the knee.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股浅动脉作为膝关节周围游离皮瓣重建的受体的有效性:四份病例报告和文献综述
目的用游离皮瓣重建膝关节周围的软组织缺损给受体血管的选择带来了挑战。虽然股浅动脉(SFA)具有易于暴露和解剖稳定的特点,但其与缺损部位的距离、吻合的难度和潜在的外周缺血问题也令人担忧。本研究旨在通过研究我们的病例和之前报道的病例,重新评估 SFA 作为膝关节重建受体血管的适用性。方法我们回顾了四例使用 SFA 游离皮瓣重建膝关节软组织缺损的病例,详细介绍了手术技巧和结果。此外,我们还利用PubMed、Web of Science和EBSCOhost数据库对有关使用SFA作为膝关节游离皮瓣受体血管的文章进行了全面的文献检索。结果在所有四例病例中,我们都使用了背阔肌(LD)皮瓣,并利用大裂缝形动脉切口进行了端侧吻合。所有皮瓣均成功存活,无并发症。我们的分析包括 85 个病例,其中包括我们的 4 个病例和 16 篇文章中的 81 个病例。肉瘤切除是最常见的病因,其次是全膝关节假体相关缺陷、创伤和骨髓炎。5%的病例皮瓣完全坏死。LD皮瓣和其他长韧带皮瓣是最主要的选择。结论尽管证据有限,但SFA似乎是膝关节软组织重建的可靠受体血管。全面了解 SFA 和所用皮瓣的特性可提高膝关节周围软组织缺损重建的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JPRAS Open
JPRAS Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: JPRAS Open is an international, open access journal dedicated to publishing case reports, short communications, and full-length articles. JPRAS Open will provide the most current source of information and references in plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. The Journal is based on the continued need to improve surgical care by providing highlights in general reconstructive surgery; cleft lip, palate and craniofacial surgery; head and neck surgery; skin cancer; breast surgery; hand surgery; lower limb trauma; burns; and aesthetic surgery. The Journal will provide authors with fast publication times.
期刊最新文献
Anatomy and biomechanics of the scapholunate ligament in Vietnamese cadavers Rare presentation and resection of giant cell tumor invading the middle ear and skull base: A case report Orthoplastic surgery research: Three decades of growth and future directions Prevalence of Silicone Lymphadenopathy in Women with Breast Implants: A single-center retrospective study Microsurgery influences breast reconstruction and its timing in patients with breast cancer: A population-based multilevel analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1