Low pneumoperitoneum pressure on venous thromboembolism in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: A randomized controlled study

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108672
{"title":"Low pneumoperitoneum pressure on venous thromboembolism in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: A randomized controlled study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant risk in colorectal cancer surgeries due to hypercoagulability and the anatomical challenges of the pelvic cavity. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, intraoperative strategies for preventing VTE may prove to be effective. This study explores the effects of intraoperative pneumoperitoneum pressures on VTE incidence following colorectal cancer surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single center parallel randomized controlled double-blind, trial involved 302 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgery. Patients were randomized to either a standard pneumoperitoneum pressure group (SP: 15 mmHg) or a low-pressure group (LP: 10 mmHg). Primary outcomes measured were the incidence of VTE, including symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT and PE. Secondary outcomes included postoperative D-dimer levels, surgery duration, blood loss, surgeon satisfaction, and oncological quality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 302 randomized patients, 275 were evaluable post exclusions, with 138 in the SP group and 137 in the LP group. The incidence of VTE was 10.9 % in the SP and 13.9 % in the LP group, with no significant difference between the two (<em>P</em> = 0.450). Secondary outcomes such as D-dimer levels, surgery duration, and blood loss showed no significant differences between two groups. Surgeon satisfaction and oncological outcomes were similarly comparable.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The trial demonstrated no significant difference in the incidence of VTE between standard and low pneumoperitoneum pressures. This suggests that lower pressures may not necessarily provide a benefit in reducing postoperative VTE in colorectal cancer surgeries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798324007248","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant risk in colorectal cancer surgeries due to hypercoagulability and the anatomical challenges of the pelvic cavity. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, intraoperative strategies for preventing VTE may prove to be effective. This study explores the effects of intraoperative pneumoperitoneum pressures on VTE incidence following colorectal cancer surgeries.

Methods

This single center parallel randomized controlled double-blind, trial involved 302 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgery. Patients were randomized to either a standard pneumoperitoneum pressure group (SP: 15 mmHg) or a low-pressure group (LP: 10 mmHg). Primary outcomes measured were the incidence of VTE, including symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT and PE. Secondary outcomes included postoperative D-dimer levels, surgery duration, blood loss, surgeon satisfaction, and oncological quality.

Results

Out of 302 randomized patients, 275 were evaluable post exclusions, with 138 in the SP group and 137 in the LP group. The incidence of VTE was 10.9 % in the SP and 13.9 % in the LP group, with no significant difference between the two (P = 0.450). Secondary outcomes such as D-dimer levels, surgery duration, and blood loss showed no significant differences between two groups. Surgeon satisfaction and oncological outcomes were similarly comparable.

Conclusions

The trial demonstrated no significant difference in the incidence of VTE between standard and low pneumoperitoneum pressures. This suggests that lower pressures may not necessarily provide a benefit in reducing postoperative VTE in colorectal cancer surgeries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低腹腔积气压力对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中静脉血栓栓塞的影响:随机对照研究
导言:由于高凝状态和盆腔解剖上的挑战,静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)在结直肠癌手术中构成了重大风险。随着微创技术的发展,术中预防 VTE 的策略可能会被证明是有效的。这项研究探讨了术中腹腔积气压力对结直肠癌手术后 VTE 发生率的影响。方法这项单中心平行随机对照双盲试验涉及 302 名接受择期腹腔镜或机器人结直肠手术的患者。患者被随机分配到标准腹腔积气压力组(SP:15 mmHg)或低压组(LP:10 mmHg)。测量的主要结果是 VTE 的发生率,包括有症状和无症状的深静脉血栓和 PE。次要结果包括术后D-二聚体水平、手术时间、失血量、外科医生满意度和肿瘤学质量。结果在302名随机患者中,有275人在排除后可进行评估,其中SP组138人,LP组137人。SP组和LP组的VTE发生率分别为10.9%和13.9%,两者之间无显著差异(P = 0.450)。D-二聚体水平、手术时间和失血量等次要结果显示,两组间无明显差异。结论该试验表明,标准腹腔积气压力和低腹腔积气压力在 VTE 发生率方面没有明显差异。这表明,较低的气腹压力并不一定能降低结直肠癌手术术后 VTE 的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Calendar of events IFC: Filler advert_sciencedirect_210x280.pdf Filler advert_pharmapendium_2021_210x280.pdf Filler advert_scopus_2021_210x280.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1