A study of natural robustness of deep reinforcement learning algorithms towards adversarial perturbations

Qisai Liu , Xian Yeow Lee , Soumik Sarkar
{"title":"A study of natural robustness of deep reinforcement learning algorithms towards adversarial perturbations","authors":"Qisai Liu ,&nbsp;Xian Yeow Lee ,&nbsp;Soumik Sarkar","doi":"10.1016/j.aiopen.2024.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been shown to have numerous potential applications in the real world. However, DRL algorithms are still extremely sensitive to noise and adversarial perturbations, hence inhibiting the deployment of RL in many real-life applications. Analyzing the robustness of DRL algorithms to adversarial attacks is an important prerequisite to enabling the widespread adoption of DRL algorithms. Common perturbations on DRL frameworks during test time include perturbations to the observation and the action channel. Compared with observation channel attacks, action channel attacks are less studied; hence, few comparisons exist that compare the effectiveness of these attacks in DRL literature. In this work, we examined the effectiveness of these two paradigms of attacks on common DRL algorithms and studied the natural robustness of DRL algorithms towards various adversarial attacks in hopes of gaining insights into the individual response of each type of algorithm under different attack conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100068,"journal":{"name":"AI Open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 126-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651024000159/pdfft?md5=a50110d80c809055a00e87466dc649b1&pid=1-s2.0-S2666651024000159-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666651024000159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has been shown to have numerous potential applications in the real world. However, DRL algorithms are still extremely sensitive to noise and adversarial perturbations, hence inhibiting the deployment of RL in many real-life applications. Analyzing the robustness of DRL algorithms to adversarial attacks is an important prerequisite to enabling the widespread adoption of DRL algorithms. Common perturbations on DRL frameworks during test time include perturbations to the observation and the action channel. Compared with observation channel attacks, action channel attacks are less studied; hence, few comparisons exist that compare the effectiveness of these attacks in DRL literature. In this work, we examined the effectiveness of these two paradigms of attacks on common DRL algorithms and studied the natural robustness of DRL algorithms towards various adversarial attacks in hopes of gaining insights into the individual response of each type of algorithm under different attack conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度强化学习算法对对抗性扰动的自然鲁棒性研究
深度强化学习(DRL)已被证明在现实世界中有许多潜在应用。然而,DRL 算法对噪声和对抗性扰动仍然极为敏感,因此阻碍了 RL 在许多现实应用中的部署。分析 DRL 算法对对抗性攻击的鲁棒性是 DRL 算法得以广泛应用的重要前提。测试期间对 DRL 框架的常见扰动包括对观察和行动通道的扰动。与观测信道攻击相比,行动信道攻击的研究较少,因此 DRL 文献中很少有比较这些攻击有效性的文章。在这项工作中,我们检验了这两种攻击范式对常见 DRL 算法的有效性,并研究了 DRL 算法对各种对抗性攻击的天然鲁棒性,希望能深入了解每种算法在不同攻击条件下的个体响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GPT understands, too Adaptive negative representations for graph contrastive learning PM2.5 forecasting under distribution shift: A graph learning approach Enhancing neural network classification using fractional-order activation functions CPT: Colorful Prompt Tuning for pre-trained vision-language models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1