The epilepsy of Dostoevsky.

Psychiatric developments Pub Date : 1986-01-01
L G Kiloh
{"title":"The epilepsy of Dostoevsky.","authors":"L G Kiloh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evidence in favour of a diagnosis of limbic epilepsy in the case of Dostoevsky is reviewed. Independent records from numerous biographical sources support the widely held view that Dostoevsky had frequent convulsive episodes, that the episodes began in childhood and continued throughout his life and that Dostoevsky himself was able accurately to record the premonitory aura and sequelae of such episodes. In addition the increasing memory impairment he suffered both for recent and remote events from the age of 40 supports the presence of progressive brain damage. This information renders implausible the analytic interpretations of Freud and his followers, that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was hysterical in origin, where epileptiform somatization was presumed to dispose of excessive psychic excitation, and that this process had its roots in Dostoevsky's unconscious hatred of his father and latent homosexuality. Nevertheless, Dostoevsky's neuroticism is clearly supported by his life-long hypochondriasis, obsessionality, paranoid traits, tendency to reactive depressions, and experience of quasi-hallucinatory episodes which were probably not epileptic in origin. Neither his epilepsy nor his neuroticism can explain or detract from the profundity and wisdom of the literary monuments which clearly attest Dostoevsky's ample genius.</p>","PeriodicalId":77773,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric developments","volume":"4 1","pages":"31-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evidence in favour of a diagnosis of limbic epilepsy in the case of Dostoevsky is reviewed. Independent records from numerous biographical sources support the widely held view that Dostoevsky had frequent convulsive episodes, that the episodes began in childhood and continued throughout his life and that Dostoevsky himself was able accurately to record the premonitory aura and sequelae of such episodes. In addition the increasing memory impairment he suffered both for recent and remote events from the age of 40 supports the presence of progressive brain damage. This information renders implausible the analytic interpretations of Freud and his followers, that Dostoevsky's epilepsy was hysterical in origin, where epileptiform somatization was presumed to dispose of excessive psychic excitation, and that this process had its roots in Dostoevsky's unconscious hatred of his father and latent homosexuality. Nevertheless, Dostoevsky's neuroticism is clearly supported by his life-long hypochondriasis, obsessionality, paranoid traits, tendency to reactive depressions, and experience of quasi-hallucinatory episodes which were probably not epileptic in origin. Neither his epilepsy nor his neuroticism can explain or detract from the profundity and wisdom of the literary monuments which clearly attest Dostoevsky's ample genius.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陀思妥耶夫斯基的癫痫症。
证据有利于边缘癫痫的诊断在陀思妥耶夫斯基的情况下进行审查。来自众多传记资料的独立记录支持了一种广泛接受的观点,即陀思妥耶夫斯基经常抽搐,这种发作始于童年,并持续一生,陀思妥耶夫斯基本人能够准确地记录这种发作的先兆和后遗症。此外,从40岁开始,他对近期和远期事件的记忆损伤日益严重,这也证明了他存在进行性脑损伤。这些信息使得弗洛伊德和他的追随者的分析解释难以置信,陀思妥耶夫斯基的癫痫是歇斯底里的起源,癫痫状躯体化被认为是处理过度的精神兴奋,这一过程的根源是陀思妥耶夫斯基对他父亲的无意识的仇恨和潜在的同性恋。然而,陀思妥耶夫斯基的神经质显然是由他一生的疑病症、强迫症、偏执特征、反应性抑郁症的倾向以及可能不是癫痫发作的准幻觉发作的经历所支持的。他的癫痫病和神经质都不能解释或减损陀思妥耶夫斯基文学作品的深刻和智慧,这些作品清楚地证明了陀思妥耶夫斯基丰富的天才。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Avoidance behaviour and major depression in panic disorder: a report from the Cross-National Collaborative Panic Study. Rationale for the planned clinical trials with nerve growth factor in Alzheimer's disease. The Parental Bonding Instrument: psychometric properties reviewed. Two kinds of borderline concepts. Conceptual and empirical agreement between DSM-III, DIB, and Kernberg. Dreaming: the impact of life stress events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1