Accessibility of low-code approaches: A systematic literature review

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information and Software Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107570
Hourieh Khalajzadeh , John Grundy
{"title":"Accessibility of low-code approaches: A systematic literature review","authors":"Hourieh Khalajzadeh ,&nbsp;John Grundy","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>Model-driven approaches are increasingly used in different domains, such as education, finance and app development, in order to involve non-developers in the software development process. Such tools are hugely dependent on visual elements and thus might not be accessible for users with specific challenges, <em>e.g.</em>, visual impairments.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives:</h3><p>To locate and analyse existing literature on the accessibility of low-code approaches, their strengths and weaknesses and key directions for future research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>We carried out a systematic literature review and searched through five leading databases for primary studies. We used both quantitative and qualitative methods for data synthesis.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>After reviewing and filtering 918 located studies, and conducting both backward and forward snowballing, we identified 38 primary studies that were included in our analysis. We found most papers focusing on accessibility of visual languages and block-based programming.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Limited work has been done on improving low code programming environment accessibility. The findings of this systematic literature review will assist researchers and developers in understanding the accessibility issues in low-code approaches and what has been done so far to develop accessible approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 107570"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001757/pdfft?md5=0f1075cef5d4359991b8dedfbe12585f&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924001757-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context:

Model-driven approaches are increasingly used in different domains, such as education, finance and app development, in order to involve non-developers in the software development process. Such tools are hugely dependent on visual elements and thus might not be accessible for users with specific challenges, e.g., visual impairments.

Objectives:

To locate and analyse existing literature on the accessibility of low-code approaches, their strengths and weaknesses and key directions for future research.

Methods:

We carried out a systematic literature review and searched through five leading databases for primary studies. We used both quantitative and qualitative methods for data synthesis.

Results:

After reviewing and filtering 918 located studies, and conducting both backward and forward snowballing, we identified 38 primary studies that were included in our analysis. We found most papers focusing on accessibility of visual languages and block-based programming.

Conclusion:

Limited work has been done on improving low code programming environment accessibility. The findings of this systematic literature review will assist researchers and developers in understanding the accessibility issues in low-code approaches and what has been done so far to develop accessible approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低代码方法的可访问性:系统文献综述
背景:为了让非开发人员参与软件开发过程,模型驱动方法越来越多地应用于教育、金融和应用程序开发等不同领域。目标:查找并分析有关低代码方法可访问性、其优缺点以及未来研究主要方向的现有文献。方法:我们进行了系统的文献综述,并在五个主要数据库中搜索了主要研究。结果:在查阅和筛选了 918 篇已定位的研究报告,并进行了前后滚雪球式的搜索后,我们确定了 38 篇主要研究报告,并将其纳入了我们的分析中。结论:在改善低代码编程环境的可访问性方面,我们所做的工作十分有限。本系统性文献综述的结果将有助于研究人员和开发人员了解低代码编程方法中的无障碍问题,以及迄今为止为开发无障碍编程方法所做的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A software product line approach for developing hybrid software systems Systematic mapping study on requirements engineering for regulatory compliance of software systems Evaluating the understandability and user acceptance of Attack-Defense Trees: Original experiment and replication Who uses personas in requirements engineering: The practitioners’ perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1