Credit card default prediction using ML and DL techniques

Fazal Wahab , Imran Khan , Sneha Sabada
{"title":"Credit card default prediction using ML and DL techniques","authors":"Fazal Wahab ,&nbsp;Imran Khan ,&nbsp;Sneha Sabada","doi":"10.1016/j.iotcps.2024.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The banking sector is widely acknowledged for its intrinsic unpredictability and susceptibility to risk. Bank loans have emerged as one of the most recent services offered over the past several decades. Banks typically serve as intermediaries for loans, investments, short-term loans, and other types of credit. The usage of credit cards is experiencing a steady increase, thereby leading to a rise in the default rate that banks encounter. Although there has been much research investigating the efficacy of conventional Machine Learning (ML) models, there has been relatively less emphasis on Deep Learning (DL) techniques. The application of DL approaches to credit card default prediction has not been extensively researched despite their considerable potential in numerous fields. Moreover, the current literature frequently lacks particular information regarding the DL structures, hyperparameters, and optimization techniques employed. To predict credit card default, this study evaluates the efficacy of a DL model and compares it to other ML models, such as Decision Tree (DT) and Adaboost. The objective of this research is to identify the specific DL parameters that contribute to the observed enhancements in the accuracy of credit card default prediction. This research makes use of the UCI ML repository to access the credit card defaulted customer dataset. Subsequently, various techniques are employed to preprocess the unprocessed data and visually present the outcomes through the use of exploratory data analysis (EDA). Furthermore, the algorithms are hypertuned to evaluate the enhancement in prediction. We used standard evaluation metrics to evaluate all the models. The evaluation indicates that the AdaBoost and DT exhibit the highest accuracy rate of 82 ​% in predicting credit card default, surpassing the accuracy of the ANN model, which is 78 ​%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100724,"journal":{"name":"Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 293-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667345224000087/pdfft?md5=f77f275cf416221418432e3c1d730036&pid=1-s2.0-S2667345224000087-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667345224000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The banking sector is widely acknowledged for its intrinsic unpredictability and susceptibility to risk. Bank loans have emerged as one of the most recent services offered over the past several decades. Banks typically serve as intermediaries for loans, investments, short-term loans, and other types of credit. The usage of credit cards is experiencing a steady increase, thereby leading to a rise in the default rate that banks encounter. Although there has been much research investigating the efficacy of conventional Machine Learning (ML) models, there has been relatively less emphasis on Deep Learning (DL) techniques. The application of DL approaches to credit card default prediction has not been extensively researched despite their considerable potential in numerous fields. Moreover, the current literature frequently lacks particular information regarding the DL structures, hyperparameters, and optimization techniques employed. To predict credit card default, this study evaluates the efficacy of a DL model and compares it to other ML models, such as Decision Tree (DT) and Adaboost. The objective of this research is to identify the specific DL parameters that contribute to the observed enhancements in the accuracy of credit card default prediction. This research makes use of the UCI ML repository to access the credit card defaulted customer dataset. Subsequently, various techniques are employed to preprocess the unprocessed data and visually present the outcomes through the use of exploratory data analysis (EDA). Furthermore, the algorithms are hypertuned to evaluate the enhancement in prediction. We used standard evaluation metrics to evaluate all the models. The evaluation indicates that the AdaBoost and DT exhibit the highest accuracy rate of 82 ​% in predicting credit card default, surpassing the accuracy of the ANN model, which is 78 ​%.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 ML 和 DL 技术预测信用卡违约情况
银行业因其固有的不可预测性和易受风险影响而广为人知。在过去几十年中,银行贷款已成为最新提供的服务之一。银行通常是贷款、投资、短期贷款和其他类型信贷的中介。信用卡的使用率正在稳步上升,从而导致银行遇到的违约率上升。尽管对传统机器学习(ML)模型的功效进行了大量研究,但对深度学习(DL)技术的重视程度相对较低。尽管深度学习方法在许多领域都具有相当大的潜力,但将其应用于信用卡违约预测的研究却并不广泛。此外,目前的文献经常缺乏有关深度学习结构、超参数和优化技术的具体信息。为了预测信用卡违约,本研究评估了 DL 模型的功效,并将其与决策树 (DT) 和 Adaboost 等其他 ML 模型进行了比较。本研究的目的是找出有助于提高信用卡违约预测准确性的特定 DL 参数。本研究利用 UCI ML 资源库访问信用卡违约客户数据集。随后,采用各种技术对未经处理的数据进行预处理,并通过探索性数据分析(EDA)直观地展示结果。此外,还对算法进行了超调,以评估预测的增强效果。我们使用标准评估指标对所有模型进行评估。评估结果表明,AdaBoost 和 DT 预测信用卡违约的准确率最高,达到 82%,超过 ANN 模型的 78%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-work conserving dynamic scheduling of moldable gang tasks on multicore systems Multi-objective optimization algorithms for intrusion detection in IoT networks: A systematic review Constructing immersive toy trial experience in mobile augmented reality Machine learning techniques for IoT security: Current research and future vision with generative AI and large language models Ransomware on cyber-physical systems: Taxonomies, case studies, security gaps, and open challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1