Towards Establishing Quality Standards on Human Rights for Services in Dementia Care

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Older People Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1111/opn.12643
Nena Panagiotidou, Jesmine Dhooper, Michelle Funk, Nathalie Drew, Katrin Seeher, Tarun Dua, Martin Orrell
{"title":"Towards Establishing Quality Standards on Human Rights for Services in Dementia Care","authors":"Nena Panagiotidou,&nbsp;Jesmine Dhooper,&nbsp;Michelle Funk,&nbsp;Nathalie Drew,&nbsp;Katrin Seeher,&nbsp;Tarun Dua,&nbsp;Martin Orrell","doi":"10.1111/opn.12643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People with dementia often experience violations of fundamental human rights and impeded access to healthcare. This study aims to investigate the views of experts regarding the use of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD) principles as quality standards for human rights–based care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A single-round Delphi e-consultation with 15 dementia experts was designed to evaluate each CRPD principle and collect feedback on their views about the application of the CRPD principles in dementia care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The CRPD principles were fully endorsed as quality standards; however, several experts commented on the complexities of the use of CRPD principles in relation to information disclosure, capacity assessment, stakeholders' involvement in decision-making, respecting needs and preferences, holistic approaches in care practice, and protection against abuse, neglect and discrimination.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings indicate the CRPD quality standards were fully applicable for people with dementia although some clarification around interpretation could assist in their use. Future research should elaborate on further points of support and guidance for dementia care providing examples of good practice from across the globe, and develop a concordant, human rights–based scheme for the implementation and evaluation of dementia services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Practice</h3>\n \n <p>This study suggests that the CRPD can serve as a benchmark for human rights-based practices in dementia services globally that could enhance nursing care practice. Nursing staff are encouraged to consider human rights in relation to the complexities associated with people with dementia, their caregivers, and other services involved in their care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/opn.12643","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.12643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

People with dementia often experience violations of fundamental human rights and impeded access to healthcare. This study aims to investigate the views of experts regarding the use of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD) principles as quality standards for human rights–based care.

Methods

A single-round Delphi e-consultation with 15 dementia experts was designed to evaluate each CRPD principle and collect feedback on their views about the application of the CRPD principles in dementia care.

Results

The CRPD principles were fully endorsed as quality standards; however, several experts commented on the complexities of the use of CRPD principles in relation to information disclosure, capacity assessment, stakeholders' involvement in decision-making, respecting needs and preferences, holistic approaches in care practice, and protection against abuse, neglect and discrimination.

Conclusions

These findings indicate the CRPD quality standards were fully applicable for people with dementia although some clarification around interpretation could assist in their use. Future research should elaborate on further points of support and guidance for dementia care providing examples of good practice from across the globe, and develop a concordant, human rights–based scheme for the implementation and evaluation of dementia services.

Implications for Practice

This study suggests that the CRPD can serve as a benchmark for human rights-based practices in dementia services globally that could enhance nursing care practice. Nursing staff are encouraged to consider human rights in relation to the complexities associated with people with dementia, their caregivers, and other services involved in their care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立痴呆症护理服务的人权质量标准
背景 痴呆症患者的基本人权经常受到侵犯,他们获得医疗保健的途径也受到阻碍。本研究旨在调查专家们对使用《联合国残疾人权利公约》(CRPD)原则作为基于人权的医疗质量标准的看法。 方法 对 15 名痴呆症专家进行了单轮德尔菲电子咨询,以评估《残疾人权利公约》的每项原则,并收集他们对《残疾人权利公约》原则在痴呆症护理中的应用的反馈意见。 结果 《残疾人权利公约》的原则作为质量标准得到了充分认可;然而,一些专家评论说,在信息披露、能力评估、利益相关者参与决策、尊重需求和偏好、护理实践中的整体方法以及防止虐待、忽视和歧视等方面,《残疾人权利公约》原则的应用非常复杂。 结论 这些研究结果表明,《残疾人权利公约》的质量标准完全适用于痴呆症患者,尽管对其解释的一些澄清可能有助于其使用。未来的研究应详细阐述痴呆症护理的更多支持和指导要点,提供全球范围内的良好实践范例,并为痴呆症服务的实施和评估制定基于人权的一致计划。 对实践的启示 本研究表明,《残疾人权利公约》可以作为全球痴呆症服务中基于人权的实践基准,从而加强护理实践。我们鼓励护理人员在考虑与痴呆症患者、其护理人员以及参与其护理的其他服务相关的复杂性时考虑人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitudes and Confidence in Providing Dementia Care to Older Adults Among Nurses Practicing in Hanoi, Vietnam: A Cross-Sectional Study A Digital Self-Administered Check-Up Assessment and Evaluation of Risk Communication in Older People Implementation and Impact of a Lifting Cushion for Care Home Residents Who Have Fallen Exploring Older People's Experiences and Factors Associated With 30-Day Hospital Readmission: A Qualitative Study Using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Re)conceptualising Good Care in Hospital Settings From the Perspectives of Older Persons: A Concept Analysis Using Pragmatic Utility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1