Meta-epidemiological study on the publication rate of South American countries' systematic reviews of interventions registered in PROSPERO

Mariana A. Burgos, Diego Ivaldi, Gisela Oltra, Camila M. Escobar Liquitay, Luis Garegnani
{"title":"Meta-epidemiological study on the publication rate of South American countries' systematic reviews of interventions registered in PROSPERO","authors":"Mariana A. Burgos,&nbsp;Diego Ivaldi,&nbsp;Gisela Oltra,&nbsp;Camila M. Escobar Liquitay,&nbsp;Luis Garegnani","doi":"10.1002/cesm.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the publication rate and time from registration to publication of systematic intervention reviews registered in PROSPERO originated from South American countries in 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design and Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional study. We searched PROSPERO for protocols of systematic reviews of interventions with affiliation in South America during 2020. We randomly extracted 10% and searched databases to identify their publication status.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 1361 intervention systematic reviews with South American affiliation registered in PROSPERO during 2020. We assessed a random sample of 10% (<i>n</i> = 135). The publishing rate in indexed journals was 36.9% (<i>n</i> = 41). The median time to publication was 1.6 years (IQR 0.9–2.1).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The publication rate of South American PROSPERO registers is low. These findings emphasize the need for further efforts to improve publication rates and increase the visibility of South American research in the global scientific community.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100286,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","volume":"2 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cesm.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cesm.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the publication rate and time from registration to publication of systematic intervention reviews registered in PROSPERO originated from South American countries in 2020.

Study Design and Setting

Cross-sectional study. We searched PROSPERO for protocols of systematic reviews of interventions with affiliation in South America during 2020. We randomly extracted 10% and searched databases to identify their publication status.

Results

We identified 1361 intervention systematic reviews with South American affiliation registered in PROSPERO during 2020. We assessed a random sample of 10% (n = 135). The publishing rate in indexed journals was 36.9% (n = 41). The median time to publication was 1.6 years (IQR 0.9–2.1).

Conclusion

The publication rate of South American PROSPERO registers is low. These findings emphasize the need for further efforts to improve publication rates and increase the visibility of South American research in the global scientific community.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于南美国家在 PROSPERO 登记的干预措施系统审查发表率的元流行病学研究
目的 评估 2020 年在 PROSPERO 登记的南美国家系统干预综述的发表率和从登记到发表的时间。 研究设计和设置 横断面研究。我们在 PROSPERO 中检索了 2020 年期间隶属于南美洲的干预措施系统性综述协议。我们随机抽取了 10%,并检索数据库以确定其出版状态。 结果 我们确定了 2020 年期间在 PROSPERO 登记的 1361 篇与南美洲有关的干预措施系统综述。我们随机抽取了 10%(n = 135)进行评估。在索引期刊上的发表率为 36.9%(n = 41)。中位发表时间为 1.6 年(IQR 0.9-2.1)。 结论 南美 PROSPERO 登记册的发表率较低。这些发现强调,需要进一步努力提高发表率,提高南美研究在全球科学界的知名度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Methodological and reporting quality of systematic and rapid reviews on human mpox and their utility during a public health emergency Issue Information “Interest-holders”: A new term to replace “stakeholders” in the context of health research and policy Empowering the future of evidence-based healthcare: The Cochrane Early Career Professionals Network Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1