Second primary malignancies after CAR T-cell therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,517 lymphoma and myeloma patients.

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Clinical Cancer Research Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1798
Tobias Tix,Mohammad Alhomoud,Roni Shouval,Edward R Scheffer Cliff,Miguel-Angel Perales,David M Cordas Dos Santos,Kai Rejeski
{"title":"Second primary malignancies after CAR T-cell therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,517 lymphoma and myeloma patients.","authors":"Tobias Tix,Mohammad Alhomoud,Roni Shouval,Edward R Scheffer Cliff,Miguel-Angel Perales,David M Cordas Dos Santos,Kai Rejeski","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nCAR T-cell therapy is a potent immunotherapy for hematologic malignancies, but patients can develop long-term adverse events including second primary malignancies (SPMs) that impact morbidity and mortality. To delineate the frequency and subtypes of SPMs following CAR-T in lymphoma and myeloma, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane) databases. Following extraction of SPM cases and assignment of malignant origin, we analyzed SPM point estimates using random effect models.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe identified 326 SPMs across 5,517 patients from 18 clinical trials (CT) and 7 real-world studies (RWS). With a median follow-up of 21.7 months, the overall SPM point estimate was 5.8% (95%CI 4.7-7.2). SPM estimates were associated with treatment setting (CT>RWS), duration of follow-up, and number of prior treatment lines, which were each confirmed as independent study-level risk factors of SPM in a meta-regression model. A subgroup meta-analysis of the four trials that randomized CAR-T versus standard-of-care revealed a similar risk of SPM with either treatment strategy (p=0.92). In a distribution analysis of SPM subtypes, hematologic malignancies were the most common (37%), followed by solid tumors (27%) and non-melanoma skin cancers (16%). T-cell malignancies represented a small minority of events (1.5%). We noted disease- and product-specific variations in SPM distribution.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThese data raise awareness of SPM as a clinically relevant long-term adverse event in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. However, our findings do not indicate that SPM frequency is higher with CAR-T versus previous standard-of-care strategies.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1798","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE CAR T-cell therapy is a potent immunotherapy for hematologic malignancies, but patients can develop long-term adverse events including second primary malignancies (SPMs) that impact morbidity and mortality. To delineate the frequency and subtypes of SPMs following CAR-T in lymphoma and myeloma, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. DESIGN A literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL (Cochrane) databases. Following extraction of SPM cases and assignment of malignant origin, we analyzed SPM point estimates using random effect models. RESULTS We identified 326 SPMs across 5,517 patients from 18 clinical trials (CT) and 7 real-world studies (RWS). With a median follow-up of 21.7 months, the overall SPM point estimate was 5.8% (95%CI 4.7-7.2). SPM estimates were associated with treatment setting (CT>RWS), duration of follow-up, and number of prior treatment lines, which were each confirmed as independent study-level risk factors of SPM in a meta-regression model. A subgroup meta-analysis of the four trials that randomized CAR-T versus standard-of-care revealed a similar risk of SPM with either treatment strategy (p=0.92). In a distribution analysis of SPM subtypes, hematologic malignancies were the most common (37%), followed by solid tumors (27%) and non-melanoma skin cancers (16%). T-cell malignancies represented a small minority of events (1.5%). We noted disease- and product-specific variations in SPM distribution. CONCLUSIONS These data raise awareness of SPM as a clinically relevant long-term adverse event in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. However, our findings do not indicate that SPM frequency is higher with CAR-T versus previous standard-of-care strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CAR T 细胞疗法后的第二原发性恶性肿瘤:对 5517 名淋巴瘤和骨髓瘤患者的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的CAR T 细胞疗法是一种治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤的强效免疫疗法,但患者可能出现长期不良反应,包括影响发病率和死亡率的第二原发性恶性肿瘤 (SPM)。为了明确淋巴瘤和骨髓瘤 CAR-T 治疗后 SPM 的发生频率和亚型,我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析。DESIGNA 在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL(Cochrane)数据库中进行了文献检索。结果我们从18项临床试验(CT)和7项真实世界研究(RWS)的5517名患者中发现了326例SPM。中位随访时间为 21.7 个月,总体 SPM 点估计值为 5.8% (95%CI 4.7-7.2)。SPM估计值与治疗环境(CT>RWS)、随访时间和既往治疗次数有关,这些因素在荟萃回归模型中均被确认为SPM的独立研究级风险因素。四项随机CAR-T与标准治疗试验的亚组荟萃分析显示,两种治疗策略的SPM风险相似(P=0.92)。在 SPM 亚型分布分析中,血液系统恶性肿瘤最常见(37%),其次是实体瘤(27%)和非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(16%)。T细胞恶性肿瘤仅占少数(1.5%)。结论:这些数据提高了人们对SPM作为接受CAR T细胞疗法患者的一种临床相关长期不良事件的认识。然而,我们的研究结果并未表明,CAR-T疗法的SPM发生率高于以往的标准疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
期刊最新文献
AACR Cancer Progress Report 2024: Inspiring Science-Fueling Progress-Revolutionizing Care. Cancer in multi-lineage mosaic RASopathies due to pathogenic variants in HRAS or KRAS: a systematic review and meta-analysis A Phase I First-in-Human Study of ABBV-011, a Seizure-Related Homolog Protein 6-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer Clonal Hematopoiesis and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Given Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (Alliance A031201) Update on Whole-body MRI Surveillance for Pediatric Cancer Predisposition Syndromes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1