11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases chronic primary pain diagnoses in children and adolescents: representation of pediatric patients in the new classification system.

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY PAIN® Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003386
Lisa-Marie Rau,Beatrice Korwisi,Antonia Barke,Michael Frosch,Boris Zernikow,Julia Wager
{"title":"11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases chronic primary pain diagnoses in children and adolescents: representation of pediatric patients in the new classification system.","authors":"Lisa-Marie Rau,Beatrice Korwisi,Antonia Barke,Michael Frosch,Boris Zernikow,Julia Wager","doi":"10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic pain is common among children and adolescents; however, the diagnoses in the newly developed 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) chronic pain chapter are based on adult criteria, overlooking pediatric neurodevelopmental differences. The chronic pain diagnoses have demonstrated good clinical applicability in adults, but to date, no field study has examined these diagnoses to the most specific diagnostic level in a pediatric sample. The current study aimed to explore pediatric representation within the ICD-11, with focus on chronic primary pain. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) at a specialized pediatric pain center documented the symptoms of and assigned both ICD-10 and ICD-11 diagnoses to N = 402 patients. Using criteria-based computer algorithms, specific ICD-11 pain diagnoses were allocated for each documented pain location, with residual diagnoses (ie, \"unspecified\") assigned if criteria were not (fully) met. Within the ICD-11, the algorithms assigned specific pain diagnoses to most patients (73.6%). In ICD-10, HCPs could not specify a diagnosis for 5.2% of patients; the ICD-11 algorithm allocated a residual chronic primary pain diagnosis in 51.2%. Residual categories were especially prevalent among younger children, boys, patients with headaches, and those with lower pain severity. Overall, clinical utility of the ICD-11 was high, although less effective for chronic back pain and headache diagnoses. The latter also exhibited the lowest agreement between HCPs and algorithm. The current study underscores the need for evidence-based improvements to the ICD-11 diagnostic criteria in pediatrics. Developing pediatric coding notes could improve the visibility of patients internationally and improve the likelihood of receiving reimbursement for necessary treatments through accurate coding.","PeriodicalId":19921,"journal":{"name":"PAIN®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PAIN®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic pain is common among children and adolescents; however, the diagnoses in the newly developed 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) chronic pain chapter are based on adult criteria, overlooking pediatric neurodevelopmental differences. The chronic pain diagnoses have demonstrated good clinical applicability in adults, but to date, no field study has examined these diagnoses to the most specific diagnostic level in a pediatric sample. The current study aimed to explore pediatric representation within the ICD-11, with focus on chronic primary pain. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) at a specialized pediatric pain center documented the symptoms of and assigned both ICD-10 and ICD-11 diagnoses to N = 402 patients. Using criteria-based computer algorithms, specific ICD-11 pain diagnoses were allocated for each documented pain location, with residual diagnoses (ie, "unspecified") assigned if criteria were not (fully) met. Within the ICD-11, the algorithms assigned specific pain diagnoses to most patients (73.6%). In ICD-10, HCPs could not specify a diagnosis for 5.2% of patients; the ICD-11 algorithm allocated a residual chronic primary pain diagnosis in 51.2%. Residual categories were especially prevalent among younger children, boys, patients with headaches, and those with lower pain severity. Overall, clinical utility of the ICD-11 was high, although less effective for chronic back pain and headache diagnoses. The latter also exhibited the lowest agreement between HCPs and algorithm. The current study underscores the need for evidence-based improvements to the ICD-11 diagnostic criteria in pediatrics. Developing pediatric coding notes could improve the visibility of patients internationally and improve the likelihood of receiving reimbursement for necessary treatments through accurate coding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际疾病分类》第 11 次修订版:儿童和青少年慢性原发性疼痛诊断:儿科患者在新分类系统中的代表性。
慢性疼痛在儿童和青少年中很常见;然而,新制定的《国际疾病分类》第 11 次修订版(ICD-11)慢性疼痛章节中的诊断是以成人标准为基础的,忽略了儿科神经发育的差异。慢性疼痛诊断在成人中显示出良好的临床适用性,但迄今为止,还没有一项实地研究对这些诊断在儿科样本中进行最具体的诊断。本研究旨在探索 ICD-11 中的儿科代表性,重点是慢性原发性疼痛。一家专业儿科疼痛中心的医护人员(HCPs)记录了 N = 402 名患者的症状,并为他们指定了 ICD-10 和 ICD-11 诊断。利用基于标准的计算机算法,为每个记录的疼痛部位分配特定的 ICD-11 疼痛诊断,如果未(完全)符合标准,则分配剩余诊断(即 "未指定")。在 ICD-11 中,算法为大多数患者(73.6%)分配了具体的疼痛诊断。在 ICD-10 中,有 5.2% 的患者无法明确诊断;而 ICD-11 算法则为 51.2% 的患者分配了残留的慢性原发性疼痛诊断。残留类别在年龄较小的儿童、男孩、头痛患者和疼痛严重程度较低的患者中尤为普遍。总体而言,ICD-11 的临床实用性很高,但对慢性背痛和头痛诊断的效果较差。后者也显示出主治医生与算法之间的一致性最低。目前的研究强调了以证据为基础改进儿科 ICD-11 诊断标准的必要性。制定儿科编码说明可提高患者在国际上的可见度,并通过准确编码提高必要治疗获得报销的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PAIN®
PAIN® 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
8.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: PAIN® is the official publication of the International Association for the Study of Pain and publishes original research on the nature,mechanisms and treatment of pain.PAIN® provides a forum for the dissemination of research in the basic and clinical sciences of multidisciplinary interest.
期刊最新文献
Reply to Roman-Juan et al. Reply to Wideman et al. The dynamics of pain avoidance: the exploration-exploitation dilemma. Patterns of physiotherapy attendance in compensated Australian workers with low back pain: a retrospective cohort study. The downside to choice: instrumental control increases conditioned nocebo hyperalgesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1