Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation for single HCC ≤5.0 cm

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY JHEP Reports Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101151
Zhoutian Yang , Shiliang Liu , Li Hu , Jinbin Chen , Juncheng Wang , Yangxun Pan , Li Xu , Mengzhong Liu , Minshan Chen , Mian Xi , Yaojun Zhang
{"title":"Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation for single HCC ≤5.0 cm","authors":"Zhoutian Yang ,&nbsp;Shiliang Liu ,&nbsp;Li Hu ,&nbsp;Jinbin Chen ,&nbsp;Juncheng Wang ,&nbsp;Yangxun Pan ,&nbsp;Li Xu ,&nbsp;Mengzhong Liu ,&nbsp;Minshan Chen ,&nbsp;Mian Xi ,&nbsp;Yaojun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><p>Radiation therapy has been refined with increasing evidence of the benefits of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether SBRT could serve as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with a single HCC lesion ≤5.0 cm who received RFA or SBRT were included. Cumulative local/distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events and subsequent treatments after recurrence were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 288 patients receiving RFA (n = 166) or SBRT (n = 122) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The cumulative local recurrence rate in the SBRT group was significantly lower than that in the RFA group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.16–0.57, <em>p &lt;</em>0.001), especially for patients with tumours &gt;2.0 cm (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08–0.50, <em>p &lt;</em>0.001) or adjacent to major vessels (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13–0.66, <em>p &lt;</em>0.001). Cumulative distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups (all <em>p</em> &gt;0.050). Adverse events were mild and easily reversible. However, more patients in the SBRT group suffered from Child-Pugh score and total bilirubin increases. More treatment options after recurrence or progression might be available for patients in the RFA group compared to those in the SBRT group (<em>p &lt;</em>0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both RFA and SBRT were effective and safe for HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm. SBRT could be an alternative treatment to RFA, especially for tumours &gt;2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels.</p></div><div><h3>Impact and implications:</h3><p>Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may be used as an alternative treatment to thermal ablation for patients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not candidates for surgical resection, including those with tumours &gt;3 cm and those with 1 to 3 tumours. This study focused on HCC patients with a specific tumour burden, namely a single lesion ≤5.0 cm, demonstrating that SBRT could be an effective and safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), especially for those with tumours &gt;2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels. The findings of this study provided robust empirical evidence supporting the utilization of SBRT in treating small HCC, while also establishing a solid foundation for future prospective clinical investigations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14764,"journal":{"name":"JHEP Reports","volume":"6 10","pages":"Article 101151"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924001551/pdfft?md5=f7052f897454239016cd976cb714b577&pid=1-s2.0-S2589555924001551-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHEP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555924001551","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

Radiation therapy has been refined with increasing evidence of the benefits of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether SBRT could serve as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm.

Methods

Patients with a single HCC lesion ≤5.0 cm who received RFA or SBRT were included. Cumulative local/distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events and subsequent treatments after recurrence were analyzed.

Results

A total of 288 patients receiving RFA (n = 166) or SBRT (n = 122) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The cumulative local recurrence rate in the SBRT group was significantly lower than that in the RFA group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.16–0.57, p <0.001), especially for patients with tumours >2.0 cm (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08–0.50, p <0.001) or adjacent to major vessels (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13–0.66, p <0.001). Cumulative distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups (all p >0.050). Adverse events were mild and easily reversible. However, more patients in the SBRT group suffered from Child-Pugh score and total bilirubin increases. More treatment options after recurrence or progression might be available for patients in the RFA group compared to those in the SBRT group (p <0.001).

Conclusions

Both RFA and SBRT were effective and safe for HCC with a single lesion ≤5.0 cm. SBRT could be an alternative treatment to RFA, especially for tumours >2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels.

Impact and implications:

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may be used as an alternative treatment to thermal ablation for patients with BCLC stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not candidates for surgical resection, including those with tumours >3 cm and those with 1 to 3 tumours. This study focused on HCC patients with a specific tumour burden, namely a single lesion ≤5.0 cm, demonstrating that SBRT could be an effective and safe alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), especially for those with tumours >2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels. The findings of this study provided robust empirical evidence supporting the utilization of SBRT in treating small HCC, while also establishing a solid foundation for future prospective clinical investigations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对于≤5.0 厘米的单发 HCC,立体定向体放射治疗是射频消融的替代方案
背景& 目的随着越来越多的证据表明立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)在治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)中的益处,放射治疗已日趋完善。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估对于单个病灶≤5.0 cm的小HCC,SBRT是否可以作为射频消融(RFA)的替代治疗方法。结果共纳入288例接受RFA(166例)或SBRT(122例)治疗的患者。两组患者的基线特征相当。SBRT组的累积局部复发率明显低于RFA组(危险比[HR] 0.30,95% CI 0.16-0.57,p <0.001),尤其是肿瘤>2.0厘米(HR 0.20,95% CI 0.08-0.50,p <0.001)或邻近主要血管(HR 0.29,95% CI 0.13-0.66,p <0.001)的患者。两组患者的累积远处复发率、无进展生存期和总生存期无明显差异(均为 p >0.050)。不良反应轻微且易逆转。不过,SBRT 组中出现 Child-Pugh 评分和总胆红素升高的患者较多。与 SBRT 组相比,RFA 组患者在复发或病情进展后可能有更多的治疗选择(p <0.001)。结论对于单发病灶≤5.0 厘米的 HCC,RFA 和 SBRT 均有效且安全。影响和意义:对于不适合手术切除的BCLC A期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者,包括肿瘤长达3厘米和1至3个肿瘤的患者,立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)可作为热消融的替代治疗方法。这项研究的重点是具有特定肿瘤负荷(即单个病灶≤5.0厘米)的肝细胞癌患者,结果表明,SBRT可以有效、安全地替代射频消融术(RFA),尤其是对于肿瘤≥2.0厘米或邻近主要血管的患者。这项研究结果为利用SBRT治疗小型HCC提供了有力的实证支持,同时也为未来的前瞻性临床研究奠定了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JHEP Reports
JHEP Reports GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
161
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: JHEP Reports is an open access journal that is affiliated with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It serves as a companion journal to the highly respected Journal of Hepatology. The primary objective of JHEP Reports is to publish original papers and reviews that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of liver diseases. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including basic, translational, and clinical research. It also focuses on global issues in hepatology, with particular emphasis on areas such as clinical trials, novel diagnostics, precision medicine and therapeutics, cancer research, cellular and molecular studies, artificial intelligence, microbiome research, epidemiology, and cutting-edge technologies. In summary, JHEP Reports is dedicated to promoting scientific discoveries and innovations in liver diseases through the publication of high-quality research papers and reviews covering various aspects of hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board page Copyright and information Mechanisms and implications of recompensation in cirrhosis Hepatocellular carcinoma risk scores for non-viral liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1