Validation of different automated segmentation models for target volume contouring in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer and regional nodal irradiation
Eva Meixner , Benjamin Glogauer , Sebastian Klüter , Friedrich Wagner , David Neugebauer , Line Hoeltgen , Lisa A. Dinges , Semi Harrabi , Jakob Liermann , Maria Vinsensia , Fabian Weykamp , Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen , Jürgen Debus , Juliane Hörner-Rieber
{"title":"Validation of different automated segmentation models for target volume contouring in postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer and regional nodal irradiation","authors":"Eva Meixner , Benjamin Glogauer , Sebastian Klüter , Friedrich Wagner , David Neugebauer , Line Hoeltgen , Lisa A. Dinges , Semi Harrabi , Jakob Liermann , Maria Vinsensia , Fabian Weykamp , Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen , Jürgen Debus , Juliane Hörner-Rieber","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Target volume delineation is routinely performed in postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer patients, but it is a time-consuming process. The aim of the present study was to validate the quality, clinical usability and institutional-specific implementation of different auto-segmentation tools into clinical routine.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three different commercially available, artificial intelligence-, ESTRO-guideline-based segmentation models (M1-3) were applied to fifty consecutive reference patients who received postoperative local RT including regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer for the delineation of clinical target volumes: the residual breast, implant or chestwall, axilla levels 1 and 2, the infra- and supraclavicular regions, the interpectoral and internal mammary nodes. Objective evaluation metrics of the created structures were conducted with the Dice similarity index (DICE) and the Hausdorff distance, and a manual evaluation of usability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The resulting geometries of the segmentation models were compared to the reference volumes for each patient and required no or only minor corrections in 72 % (M1), 64 % (M2) and 78 % (M3) of the cases. The median DICE and Hausdorff values for the resulting planning target volumes were 0.87–0.88 and 2.96–3.55, respectively. Clinical usability was significantly correlated with the DICE index, with calculated cut-off values used to define no or minor adjustments of 0.82–0.86. Right or left sided target and breathing method (deep inspiration breath hold vs. free breathing) did not impact the quality of the resulting structures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Artificial intelligence-based auto-segmentation programs showed high-quality accuracy and provided standardization and efficient support for guideline-based target volume contouring as a precondition for fully automated workflows in radiotherapy treatment planning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100855"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001320/pdfft?md5=e38267f10cb1b9c6eb12938744ad4ed6&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824001320-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Target volume delineation is routinely performed in postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer patients, but it is a time-consuming process. The aim of the present study was to validate the quality, clinical usability and institutional-specific implementation of different auto-segmentation tools into clinical routine.
Methods
Three different commercially available, artificial intelligence-, ESTRO-guideline-based segmentation models (M1-3) were applied to fifty consecutive reference patients who received postoperative local RT including regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer for the delineation of clinical target volumes: the residual breast, implant or chestwall, axilla levels 1 and 2, the infra- and supraclavicular regions, the interpectoral and internal mammary nodes. Objective evaluation metrics of the created structures were conducted with the Dice similarity index (DICE) and the Hausdorff distance, and a manual evaluation of usability.
Results
The resulting geometries of the segmentation models were compared to the reference volumes for each patient and required no or only minor corrections in 72 % (M1), 64 % (M2) and 78 % (M3) of the cases. The median DICE and Hausdorff values for the resulting planning target volumes were 0.87–0.88 and 2.96–3.55, respectively. Clinical usability was significantly correlated with the DICE index, with calculated cut-off values used to define no or minor adjustments of 0.82–0.86. Right or left sided target and breathing method (deep inspiration breath hold vs. free breathing) did not impact the quality of the resulting structures.
Conclusion
Artificial intelligence-based auto-segmentation programs showed high-quality accuracy and provided standardization and efficient support for guideline-based target volume contouring as a precondition for fully automated workflows in radiotherapy treatment planning.