Virtual reality-enhanced interventions on preoperative anxiety symptoms in adults undergoing elective surgery: A meta-analysis and meta-regression

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104886
{"title":"Virtual reality-enhanced interventions on preoperative anxiety symptoms in adults undergoing elective surgery: A meta-analysis and meta-regression","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Virtual reality exposure and distraction are recent novel technologies for reducing preoperative anxiety symptoms. However, the effectiveness of virtual reality-enhanced interventions in adults is still controversial and has yet to be evaluated in a systematic review.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study aimed to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality-enhanced interventions on preoperative anxiety symptoms in adults compared to comparators; and (2) identify the factors affecting the effectiveness of interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a three-step systematic search from inception until May 1, 2024, using (1) eleven databases, (2) two clinical registries, and (3) citation and grey literature searches in either English or Chinese. The package <em>meta</em> of R software version 4.3.1 was used to perform the meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression analyses. We adopted the restricted maximum likelihood estimator for random-effects meta-analysis and univariate random-effects meta-regression analyses. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria were used to examine quality assessment and the certainty of evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We selected 26 randomised controlled trials with 2357 participants from 12 different countries. Random-effects meta-analyses showed that virtual reality-enhanced interventions had a statistically significant reduction in preoperative anxiety symptoms (<em>t</em> = −<!--> <!-->5.58, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) with a moderate to large effect size (Hedges' <em>g</em> = −<!--> <!-->0.76, 95 % confidence interval: −<!--> <!-->1.03 to −<!--> <!-->0.48) compared to usual care. Statistically significant subgroup differences were found for the nature of the intervention, geographical region, country, and type of surgery. The improvement in preoperative anxiety symptom outcomes was greater when the virtual reality-enhanced interventions were chosen by patients (<em>g</em> = −<!--> <!-->2.55, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->3.08 to −<!--> <!-->2.02) when compared to virtual reality exposure interventions with educational content (<em>g</em> = −<!--> <!-->0.72, 95%CI: −<!--> <!-->1.07 to −<!--> <!-->0.38) or virtual reality distraction interventions (<em>g</em> = −<!--> <!-->0.64, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->1.04 to −<!--> <!-->0.23). Trials conducted in Asia had a greater effect on preoperative anxiety symptom outcomes (<em>g</em> = −<!--> <!-->0.98, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->1.33 to −<!--> <!-->0. 62) in comparison with those conducted in non-Asia (<em>g</em> = −<!--> <!-->0.23, 95 % CI: −<!--> <!-->0.54 to 0.07). The random-effects meta-regression identified sample size (<em>β</em> = −<!--> <!-->0.008, <em>p</em> = 0.031) as a statistically significant covariate of preoperative anxiety symptoms. The overall certainty of the evidence was very low.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Virtual reality-enhanced interventions can be considered supplementary interventions for adults undergoing elective surgery. Future trials on a large scale with follow-up assessments are needed.</p></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><p>PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024486343.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748924001998","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Virtual reality exposure and distraction are recent novel technologies for reducing preoperative anxiety symptoms. However, the effectiveness of virtual reality-enhanced interventions in adults is still controversial and has yet to be evaluated in a systematic review.

Objectives

The study aimed to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality-enhanced interventions on preoperative anxiety symptoms in adults compared to comparators; and (2) identify the factors affecting the effectiveness of interventions.

Design

Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Methods

We conducted a three-step systematic search from inception until May 1, 2024, using (1) eleven databases, (2) two clinical registries, and (3) citation and grey literature searches in either English or Chinese. The package meta of R software version 4.3.1 was used to perform the meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression analyses. We adopted the restricted maximum likelihood estimator for random-effects meta-analysis and univariate random-effects meta-regression analyses. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool version 2 and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria were used to examine quality assessment and the certainty of evidence.

Results

We selected 26 randomised controlled trials with 2357 participants from 12 different countries. Random-effects meta-analyses showed that virtual reality-enhanced interventions had a statistically significant reduction in preoperative anxiety symptoms (t = − 5.58, p < 0.001) with a moderate to large effect size (Hedges' g = − 0.76, 95 % confidence interval: − 1.03 to − 0.48) compared to usual care. Statistically significant subgroup differences were found for the nature of the intervention, geographical region, country, and type of surgery. The improvement in preoperative anxiety symptom outcomes was greater when the virtual reality-enhanced interventions were chosen by patients (g = − 2.55, 95 % CI: − 3.08 to − 2.02) when compared to virtual reality exposure interventions with educational content (g = − 0.72, 95%CI: − 1.07 to − 0.38) or virtual reality distraction interventions (g = − 0.64, 95 % CI: − 1.04 to − 0.23). Trials conducted in Asia had a greater effect on preoperative anxiety symptom outcomes (g = − 0.98, 95 % CI: − 1.33 to − 0. 62) in comparison with those conducted in non-Asia (g = − 0.23, 95 % CI: − 0.54 to 0.07). The random-effects meta-regression identified sample size (β = − 0.008, p = 0.031) as a statistically significant covariate of preoperative anxiety symptoms. The overall certainty of the evidence was very low.

Conclusions

Virtual reality-enhanced interventions can be considered supplementary interventions for adults undergoing elective surgery. Future trials on a large scale with follow-up assessments are needed.

Registration

PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42024486343.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟现实增强干预对接受择期手术的成人术前焦虑症状的影响:荟萃分析和荟萃回归
背景虚拟现实暴露和分散注意力是近年来减少术前焦虑症状的新技术。研究目的:(1) 评估虚拟现实增强干预与比较者相比对成人术前焦虑症状的效果;(2) 确定影响干预效果的因素。方法我们从开始到2024年5月1日进行了三步系统检索,使用了(1)11个数据库;(2)2个临床登记;(3)英文或中文引文和灰色文献检索。我们使用 4.3.1 版 R 软件的 meta 软件包进行了荟萃分析、亚组分析和元回归分析。我们采用限制性最大似然估计法进行随机效应荟萃分析和单变量随机效应元回归分析。我们使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具第 2 版和推荐、评估、发展和评价分级标准来检查质量评估和证据的确定性。随机效应荟萃分析表明,与常规护理相比,虚拟现实增强干预能显著减轻术前焦虑症状(t = - 5.58,p <0.001),其效应大小为中度到大型(Hedges' g = - 0.76,95 % 置信区间:- 1.03 到 - 0.48)。在干预性质、地理区域、国家和手术类型方面,发现了具有统计学意义的亚组差异。与带有教育内容的虚拟现实暴露干预(g = - 0.72,95%CI:- 1.07 至 - 0.38)或虚拟现实分散注意力干预(g = - 0.64,95%CI:- 1.04 至 - 0.23)相比,患者选择虚拟现实增强干预(g = - 2.55,95%CI:- 3.08 至 - 2.02)时,术前焦虑症状结果的改善程度更大。与在非亚洲进行的试验(g = - 0.23,95 % CI:- 0.54 至 0.07)相比,在亚洲进行的试验对术前焦虑症状结果的影响更大(g = - 0.98,95 % CI:- 1.33 至 - 0.62)。随机效应元回归发现,样本大小(β = - 0.008,p = 0.031)是术前焦虑症状的一个具有统计学意义的协变量。结论对于接受择期手术的成人来说,虚拟现实增强干预可被视为辅助性干预措施。未来需要进行大规模的试验和随访评估:CRD42024486343。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Effects of a nurse-led staged integral art-based cognitive intervention for older adults on the Alzheimer's disease spectrum: A randomized controlled trial Editorial Board Effectiveness of palliative care interventions on patient-reported outcomes and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis Virtual reality-enhanced interventions on preoperative anxiety symptoms in adults undergoing elective surgery: A meta-analysis and meta-regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1