To scope or not to scope? The benefits and challenges of integrating scoping studies in rapid qualitative research and evaluation

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation and Program Planning Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102495
Syka Iqbal, Macarena Chepo, Marc Hébert, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
{"title":"To scope or not to scope? The benefits and challenges of integrating scoping studies in rapid qualitative research and evaluation","authors":"Syka Iqbal,&nbsp;Macarena Chepo,&nbsp;Marc Hébert,&nbsp;Cecilia Vindrola-Padros","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Creating sustainable change and fostering collaborative relationships between researchers and stakeholders is a recognized challenge in the field of evaluation. Identifying programme purpose, cultural context, potential challenges, and engaging stakeholders before an evaluation can produce responsive and impactful evaluations. This paper discusses implementing a targeted scoping study within the framework of rapid qualitative research and evaluation. A scoping study enables collaborative decision-making on evaluation priorities, and functions as an evaluability assessment in time-sensitive contexts. In our experience, a scoping study can be carried out in as little as five days or as long as six weeks. It is timely to revisit the question of what factors influence evaluation outcomes, a scoping study can be used to support an evaluation, address access to data and research, and strengthen communication channels. The methodological approach was used to co-produce an evaluation with an NGO that accurately reflected their needs, recognizing possible challenges and solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 102495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000971/pdfft?md5=e7b517fda6e66e5253068b449d13b057&pid=1-s2.0-S0149718924000971-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924000971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creating sustainable change and fostering collaborative relationships between researchers and stakeholders is a recognized challenge in the field of evaluation. Identifying programme purpose, cultural context, potential challenges, and engaging stakeholders before an evaluation can produce responsive and impactful evaluations. This paper discusses implementing a targeted scoping study within the framework of rapid qualitative research and evaluation. A scoping study enables collaborative decision-making on evaluation priorities, and functions as an evaluability assessment in time-sensitive contexts. In our experience, a scoping study can be carried out in as little as five days or as long as six weeks. It is timely to revisit the question of what factors influence evaluation outcomes, a scoping study can be used to support an evaluation, address access to data and research, and strengthen communication channels. The methodological approach was used to co-produce an evaluation with an NGO that accurately reflected their needs, recognizing possible challenges and solutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定范围还是不确定范围?在快速定性研究和评估中整合范围界定研究的益处和挑战
在研究人员和利益相关者之间创造可持续的变革和促进合作关系是评价领域公认的 挑战。在评估前确定计划目的、文化背景、潜在挑战并让利益相关者参与进来,可以产生反应迅速、影响深远的评估。本文讨论了在快速定性研究和评估框架内实施有针对性的范围界定研究的问题。范围界定研究有助于就评估优先事项进行合作决策,并在时间紧迫的情况下发挥可评 估性评估的作用。根据我们的经验,范围界定研究可以在短至五天或长至六周的时间内完成。现在是重新审视哪些因素会影响评估结果这一问题的时候了,范围界定研究可以用来 支持评估,解决数据和研究的获取问题,并加强沟通渠道。采用这种方法与非政府组织共同进行评估,准确地反映了他们的需求,认识到可能存在的 挑战和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
期刊最新文献
Overview of rural credit environment in China: Measurement logic, evaluation system, and case analysis. Uses of the viable validity concept: A systematic scoping review Analyzing the impact of the new educational policy 2020: A comprehensive review of India's educational reforms A deep dive into the factors affecting household solar photovoltaic adoption: An extended perspective of the value-based adoption model Meta-analysis of chemistry-based interdisciplinary informal research experience program for high school students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1