A systematic review and meta-analysis of PTSD symptoms at mid-treatment during trauma-focused treatment for PTSD

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102925
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of PTSD symptoms at mid-treatment during trauma-focused treatment for PTSD","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is concern that trauma memory processing in psychological therapies leads to PTSD symptom exacerbation. We compared PTSD symptoms at mid-treatment in trauma-focused psychological therapy to control groups. We systematically searched multiple databases and searched grey literature. We included randomised controlled trials involving adults comparing trauma-focused psychological interventions with active non-trauma-focused interventions or waitlist conditions. Twenty-three studies met our inclusion criteria. We found no evidence of PTSD symptom exacerbation at mid-treatment in trauma-focused interventions compared to control groups (<em>g</em>=−.16, [95 % confidence interval, CI, −.34,.03]). Sensitivity analyses with high quality studies (risk of bias assessment ≥ 7; <em>g</em>=−.25; [95 % CI −.48, −.03], <em>k</em> = 12) and studies with passive controls (<em>g</em>=−.32; [95 % CI −.59, −.05], <em>k</em> = 8) yielded small effect sizes favouring trauma-focused interventions. At post-treatment, trauma-focused interventions yielded a medium effect on PTSD symptoms compared to all controls (<em>g</em>=−.57; [CI −.79, −.35], <em>k</em> = 23). Regarding depression, trauma-focused interventions yielded a small effect size compared to controls at mid-treatment (<em>g</em>=−.23; [95 % CI −.39, −.08], <em>k</em> = 12) and post-treatment (<em>g</em>=−.45; [CI −.66, −.25], <em>k</em> = 12). This meta-analysis found no evidence that trauma-focused psychotherapies elicit symptom exacerbation at mid-treatment in terms of PTSD or depression symptoms. Instead, this meta-analysis suggests that the benefits of trauma-focused interventions can be experienced through improved depression and possibly PTSD before the conclusion of therapy. However, it is possible that symptom exacerbation occurred before mid-treatment and/or that people who experience symptom exacerbation drop out of studies and so are not included in the analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524001014/pdfft?md5=08a90f06d93270e9b88ad7627b0103ad&pid=1-s2.0-S0887618524001014-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618524001014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is concern that trauma memory processing in psychological therapies leads to PTSD symptom exacerbation. We compared PTSD symptoms at mid-treatment in trauma-focused psychological therapy to control groups. We systematically searched multiple databases and searched grey literature. We included randomised controlled trials involving adults comparing trauma-focused psychological interventions with active non-trauma-focused interventions or waitlist conditions. Twenty-three studies met our inclusion criteria. We found no evidence of PTSD symptom exacerbation at mid-treatment in trauma-focused interventions compared to control groups (g=−.16, [95 % confidence interval, CI, −.34,.03]). Sensitivity analyses with high quality studies (risk of bias assessment ≥ 7; g=−.25; [95 % CI −.48, −.03], k = 12) and studies with passive controls (g=−.32; [95 % CI −.59, −.05], k = 8) yielded small effect sizes favouring trauma-focused interventions. At post-treatment, trauma-focused interventions yielded a medium effect on PTSD symptoms compared to all controls (g=−.57; [CI −.79, −.35], k = 23). Regarding depression, trauma-focused interventions yielded a small effect size compared to controls at mid-treatment (g=−.23; [95 % CI −.39, −.08], k = 12) and post-treatment (g=−.45; [CI −.66, −.25], k = 12). This meta-analysis found no evidence that trauma-focused psychotherapies elicit symptom exacerbation at mid-treatment in terms of PTSD or depression symptoms. Instead, this meta-analysis suggests that the benefits of trauma-focused interventions can be experienced through improved depression and possibly PTSD before the conclusion of therapy. However, it is possible that symptom exacerbation occurred before mid-treatment and/or that people who experience symptom exacerbation drop out of studies and so are not included in the analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤后应激障碍集中疗法治疗中期创伤后应激障碍症状的系统回顾和荟萃分析
有人担心心理疗法中的创伤记忆处理会导致创伤后应激障碍症状加重。我们比较了以创伤为重点的心理治疗组和对照组在治疗中期的创伤后应激障碍症状。我们系统地搜索了多个数据库,并检索了灰色文献。我们纳入了将以创伤为中心的心理干预与积极的非以创伤为中心的干预或等待名单条件进行比较的成人随机对照试验。有 23 项研究符合我们的纳入标准。我们发现,与对照组相比,没有证据表明以创伤为中心的干预措施在治疗中期会导致创伤后应激障碍症状加重(g=-.16,[95% 置信区间,CI, -.34,.03])。通过对高质量研究(偏倚风险评估≥7;g=-.25;[95 % CI -.48,-.03],k = 12)和被动对照研究(g=-.32;[95 % CI -.59,-.05],k = 8)进行敏感性分析,得出了有利于创伤焦点干预的小效应量。在治疗后,与所有对照组相比,以创伤为中心的干预对创伤后应激障碍症状的影响为中等(g=-.57;[CI -.79,-.35],k = 23)。在抑郁方面,在治疗中期(g=-.23;[95 % CI -.39,-.08],k = 12)和治疗后(g=-.45;[CI -.66,-.25],k = 12),与对照组相比,以创伤为中心的干预产生了较小的效应。这项荟萃分析没有发现任何证据表明,就创伤后应激障碍或抑郁症状而言,以创伤为重点的心理疗法在治疗中期会导致症状加重。相反,这项荟萃分析表明,在治疗结束前,以创伤为重点的干预措施可以通过改善抑郁和创伤后应激障碍来带来益处。然而,症状加重有可能发生在治疗中期之前,和/或出现症状加重的人退出了研究,因此未被纳入分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Daily stress and emotions in relation to fear of negative and positive evaluation Fear of positive evaluation and social affiliation in social anxiety disorder and major depression A within-person test of the metacognitive model: Daily dynamics between metacognitive beliefs, metacognitive strategies, and negative affect Cross-cultural validation of the BFOE model: Best practices and future directions for psychometric evaluation of the Fear of positive evaluation scale – Insights from a Dutch translation Cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder – A critical review of methodological designs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1