Evaluation of levetiracetam loading dose in adult patients with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.09.007
{"title":"Evaluation of levetiracetam loading dose in adult patients with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency defined as continued seizure activity greater than five minutes or recurrent seizure activity without return to baseline. Benzodiazepine-refractory SE is continuous seizure activity despite treatment with a benzodiazepine. Treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory SE includes levetiracetam with loading doses ranging from 20 mg/kg to 60 mg/kg up to a maximum dose of 4500 mg. While levetiracetam has minimal adverse effects, there is currently a lack of studies directly comparing the safety and efficacy of various loading doses of levetiracetam.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three loading doses of levetiracetam in the setting of benzodiazepine-refractory SE.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a single center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with benzodiazepine-refractory SE who were treated with levetiracetam from April 1, 2016, to August 31, 2023. Patients with documented hypersensitivity to levetiracetam, those who were pregnant or incarcerated and patients who received an alternative antiepileptic drug (AED) prior to levetiracetam were excluded. Patients with other identifiable causes of SE including hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, hyponatremia or who were post cardiac arrest were also excluded. Patients were divided into three arms based on loading dose of levetiracetam administered (≤20 mg/kg [LEVlow], 21‐–39 mg/kg [LEVmed] or ≥40 mg/kg [LEVhigh]). The primary endpoint was the rate of seizure termination, defined as the lack of need for an additional AED within 60 min following levetiracetam administration. Secondary outcomes included the rate of intubation, and recurrent seizure activity 60 min to 24 h post seizure termination as defined by positive EEG results or need for an additional AED. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the influence of adequate loading doses of benzodiazepines, and outpatient levetiracetam use.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 740 patients were screened for inclusion, with 218 patients being included in the primary analysis. Patients were divided into three groups with an average levetiracetam loading dose of 14.5 mg/kg in the LEVlow group, 28.8 mg/kg in the LEVmed group, and 48.8 mg/kg in the LEVhigh group. There was no difference in rates of seizure termination at 60 min (92.9% LEVlow vs 89.3% LEVmed vs 84.7% LEVhigh; <em>p</em> = 0.377). Additionally, no difference was found in rates of recurrent seizure activity between 60 min and 24 h post levetiracetam loading dose (32.1% LEVlow vs 32.0% LEVmed vs 28.8% LEVhigh; <em>p</em> = 0.899). However, the LEVhigh group did have a higher rate of intubation (45.8%) compared to the LEVmed (28.2%) and LEVlow (26.8%) group (<em>p</em> = 0.040).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The loading of levetiracetam did not result in a statistically significant difference in rate of seizure termination at 60 min nor did it appear to impact the rate of recurrent seizures at 24 h. However, we did find higher rates of intubation in patients who received levetiracetam &gt;40 mg/kg. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal loading dose of levetiracetam in benzodiazepine-refractory SE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724004479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency defined as continued seizure activity greater than five minutes or recurrent seizure activity without return to baseline. Benzodiazepine-refractory SE is continuous seizure activity despite treatment with a benzodiazepine. Treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory SE includes levetiracetam with loading doses ranging from 20 mg/kg to 60 mg/kg up to a maximum dose of 4500 mg. While levetiracetam has minimal adverse effects, there is currently a lack of studies directly comparing the safety and efficacy of various loading doses of levetiracetam.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three loading doses of levetiracetam in the setting of benzodiazepine-refractory SE.

Methods

This was a single center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients with benzodiazepine-refractory SE who were treated with levetiracetam from April 1, 2016, to August 31, 2023. Patients with documented hypersensitivity to levetiracetam, those who were pregnant or incarcerated and patients who received an alternative antiepileptic drug (AED) prior to levetiracetam were excluded. Patients with other identifiable causes of SE including hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, hyponatremia or who were post cardiac arrest were also excluded. Patients were divided into three arms based on loading dose of levetiracetam administered (≤20 mg/kg [LEVlow], 21‐–39 mg/kg [LEVmed] or ≥40 mg/kg [LEVhigh]). The primary endpoint was the rate of seizure termination, defined as the lack of need for an additional AED within 60 min following levetiracetam administration. Secondary outcomes included the rate of intubation, and recurrent seizure activity 60 min to 24 h post seizure termination as defined by positive EEG results or need for an additional AED. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the influence of adequate loading doses of benzodiazepines, and outpatient levetiracetam use.

Results

Overall, 740 patients were screened for inclusion, with 218 patients being included in the primary analysis. Patients were divided into three groups with an average levetiracetam loading dose of 14.5 mg/kg in the LEVlow group, 28.8 mg/kg in the LEVmed group, and 48.8 mg/kg in the LEVhigh group. There was no difference in rates of seizure termination at 60 min (92.9% LEVlow vs 89.3% LEVmed vs 84.7% LEVhigh; p = 0.377). Additionally, no difference was found in rates of recurrent seizure activity between 60 min and 24 h post levetiracetam loading dose (32.1% LEVlow vs 32.0% LEVmed vs 28.8% LEVhigh; p = 0.899). However, the LEVhigh group did have a higher rate of intubation (45.8%) compared to the LEVmed (28.2%) and LEVlow (26.8%) group (p = 0.040).

Conclusion

The loading of levetiracetam did not result in a statistically significant difference in rate of seizure termination at 60 min nor did it appear to impact the rate of recurrent seizures at 24 h. However, we did find higher rates of intubation in patients who received levetiracetam >40 mg/kg. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal loading dose of levetiracetam in benzodiazepine-refractory SE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估左乙拉西坦负荷剂量对苯二氮卓难治性癫痫状态成人患者的疗效
背景癫痫状态(SE)是一种神经系统急症,定义为持续发作活动超过五分钟或反复发作活动未恢复基线。苯二氮卓难治性 SE 是指在使用苯二氮卓治疗后仍有持续的癫痫发作活动。苯二氮卓难治性 SE 的治疗包括左乙拉西坦,负荷剂量从 20 毫克/千克到 60 毫克/千克不等,最大剂量为 4500 毫克。虽然左乙拉西坦的不良反应极小,但目前缺乏直接比较各种负荷剂量左乙拉西坦安全性和疗效的研究。本研究旨在评估苯二氮卓难治性SE患者服用三种负荷剂量左乙拉西坦的安全性和疗效。方法这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2016年4月1日至2023年8月31日期间接受左乙拉西坦治疗的苯二氮卓难治性SE成年患者。排除了对左乙拉西坦过敏的患者、怀孕或被监禁的患者以及在使用左乙拉西坦之前接受过其他抗癫痫药物(AED)治疗的患者。此外,还排除了其他可确定的 SE 病因的患者,包括高血糖、低血糖、低钠血症或心脏骤停后的患者。根据左乙拉西坦的负荷剂量(≤20毫克/千克[LEVlow]、21-39毫克/千克[LEVmed]或≥40毫克/千克[LEVhigh]),患者被分为三组。主要终点是癫痫发作终止率,即在服用左乙拉西坦后60分钟内不需要额外的AED。次要结果包括插管率、发作终止后 60 分钟至 24 小时内的复发性发作活动(定义为脑电图结果呈阳性或需要额外的 AED)。进行了亚组分析,以评估苯二氮卓类药物足够的负荷剂量和门诊使用左乙拉西坦的影响。结果共筛选出 740 名患者,其中 218 名患者被纳入主要分析。患者被分为三组,左乙拉西坦平均负荷剂量分别为:LEVlow组14.5毫克/千克,LEVmed组28.8毫克/千克,LEVhigh组48.8毫克/千克。60 分钟时癫痫发作终止率没有差异(92.9% LEVlow vs 89.3% LEVmed vs 84.7% LEVhigh;P = 0.377)。此外,在左乙拉西坦负荷剂量后 60 分钟至 24 小时期间,癫痫复发率也没有差异(32.1% LEVlow vs 32.0% LEVmed vs 28.8% LEVhigh;p = 0.899)。然而,与LEVmed组(28.2%)和LEVlow组(26.8%)相比,LEVhigh组的插管率(45.8%)确实更高(p = 0.040)。要确定苯二氮卓难治性 SE 的最佳左乙拉西坦负荷剂量,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Gabapentinoid prescribing patterns and predictors utilizing neural networks:Comment. Why is oral diltiazem protocol more effective than intravenous protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department? Epidemiology of heart failure presentations to United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023. Characterizing emergency department surgical airway placement in the setting of trauma - A reply with a data-in-brief analysis of the pediatric cricothyrotomy. An update of the severe trauma scoring system using the Korean National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1