Persistence of dicamba residue in harvested soybeans

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRONOMY Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1002/agg2.20564
Jerri Lynn Henry, Chung-Ho Lin, Jason W. Weirich, Reid J. Smeda
{"title":"Persistence of dicamba residue in harvested soybeans","authors":"Jerri Lynn Henry,&nbsp;Chung-Ho Lin,&nbsp;Jason W. Weirich,&nbsp;Reid J. Smeda","doi":"10.1002/agg2.20564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adoption of dicamba-tolerant soybeans contributed to widespread reports of chemical trespassing on adjacent, sensitive soybeans. Reports of the impact of dicamba on sensitive soybeans (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) have been well documented; however, the potential for dicamba carryover into harvested beans from sensitive plants has largely been overlooked. Field trials in central Missouri focused on assessing the injury and yield response of sensitive soybeans to concentrations of dicamba as low as 0.25% of the use rate (10 µL L<sup>−1</sup> dicamba). In both 2018 and 2019, dicamba-sensitive soybeans were planted in conventional row spacing and treated with 10–300 µL L<sup>−1</sup> dicamba at both V3 and R1 soybeans. Dicamba symptoms were visible in less than 7 days after application (DAA); significant injury was observed at 10 µL L<sup>−1</sup> and persisted through the duration of the study (28 DAA). Injury levels reached almost 50% with 300 µL L<sup>−1</sup> dicamba. Step-wise increases in soybean yield losses occurred with increasing dicamba concentrations and reached 50% with 300 µL L<sup>−1</sup> dicamba. Yield losses were up to 10% greater for R1 versus V3 soybeans treated with the same dicamba concentration. Dicamba residues in bean tissue ranged from 0.72 to 0.81 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> for 150 to 300 µL L<sup>−1</sup> dicamba, and residues were similar for beans at both V3 and R1. Dicamba persisted in beans harvested up to 122 days after plant exposure to dicamba. Although dicamba residues were within limits established by the EPA (10 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>), residues exceeded that allowed in marketed, organic soybeans (0.5 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>).</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20564","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.20564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adoption of dicamba-tolerant soybeans contributed to widespread reports of chemical trespassing on adjacent, sensitive soybeans. Reports of the impact of dicamba on sensitive soybeans (Glycine max L.) have been well documented; however, the potential for dicamba carryover into harvested beans from sensitive plants has largely been overlooked. Field trials in central Missouri focused on assessing the injury and yield response of sensitive soybeans to concentrations of dicamba as low as 0.25% of the use rate (10 µL L−1 dicamba). In both 2018 and 2019, dicamba-sensitive soybeans were planted in conventional row spacing and treated with 10–300 µL L−1 dicamba at both V3 and R1 soybeans. Dicamba symptoms were visible in less than 7 days after application (DAA); significant injury was observed at 10 µL L−1 and persisted through the duration of the study (28 DAA). Injury levels reached almost 50% with 300 µL L−1 dicamba. Step-wise increases in soybean yield losses occurred with increasing dicamba concentrations and reached 50% with 300 µL L−1 dicamba. Yield losses were up to 10% greater for R1 versus V3 soybeans treated with the same dicamba concentration. Dicamba residues in bean tissue ranged from 0.72 to 0.81 mg kg−1 for 150 to 300 µL L−1 dicamba, and residues were similar for beans at both V3 and R1. Dicamba persisted in beans harvested up to 122 days after plant exposure to dicamba. Although dicamba residues were within limits established by the EPA (10 mg kg−1), residues exceeded that allowed in marketed, organic soybeans (0.5 mg kg−1).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麦草畏在收获大豆中残留的持久性
耐麦草畏大豆的采用导致了有关化学品侵入邻近敏感大豆的广泛报道。有关麦草畏对敏感大豆(Glycine max L.)的影响的报告已被详细记录;然而,麦草畏从敏感植物带入收获大豆的可能性却在很大程度上被忽视了。密苏里州中部的田间试验侧重于评估敏感大豆对低至 0.25% 使用量(10 µL L-1 麦草畏)的麦草畏浓度的伤害和产量反应。2018 年和 2019 年,麦草畏敏感大豆均以常规行距种植,并在 V3 和 R1 大豆上使用 10-300 µL L-1 麦草畏处理。麦草畏症状在施用后不到 7 天(DAA)就能看到;在 10 µL L-1 时观察到明显的伤害,并在研究期间(28 DAA)持续存在。300 µL L-1 麦草畏的伤害程度几乎达到 50%。随着麦草畏浓度的增加,大豆产量损失逐步增加,300 µL L-1 麦草畏的产量损失达到 50%。在麦草畏浓度相同的情况下,R1 大豆的产量损失比 V3 大豆高出 10%。150 至 300 µL L-1 麦草畏在大豆组织中的残留量为 0.72 至 0.81 mg kg-1,V3 和 R1 大豆的残留量相似。麦草畏在植物接触麦草畏 122 天后收获的豆类中仍有残留。虽然麦草畏的残留量在美国环保局规定的限量范围内(10 毫克/千克-1),但残留量超过了市场上销售的有机大豆允许的限量(0.5 毫克/千克-1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predicting spatiotemporal patterns of productivity and grazing from multispectral data using neural network analysis based on system complexity Combined inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi with Meso-rhizobium improves nutrient uptake, growth performance, and moisture stress tolerance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Optimizing crop geometry for enhanced growth and yield of soybean [Glycine max L. (Merrill)] maturity groups in western Ethiopia Purple nutsedge management in tomato plasticulture: A study on the effectiveness of preemergence herbicide S-metolachlor and its co-application with fertilizer enhancer and chelated iron Persistence of dicamba residue in harvested soybeans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1