Optimal Antihypertensive Systolic Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.23597
Paul K Whelton,Samantha O'Connell,Katherine T Mills,Jiang He
{"title":"Optimal Antihypertensive Systolic Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Paul K Whelton,Samantha O'Connell,Katherine T Mills,Jiang He","doi":"10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.23597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nSystolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering reduces major cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. However, the optimal target for SBP lowering remains controversial.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe included trials with random allocation to an SBP <130 mm Hg treatment target and CVD as the primary outcome. Data were extracted from each study independently and in duplicate using a standardized protocol. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for CVD and all-cause mortality comparing SBP <130 and ≥130 mm Hg treatment targets. A secondary analysis compared the same outcomes for randomization to an SBP target of <120 or <140 mm Hg.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSeven trials, including 72 138 participants, met the eligibility criteria. Compared with an SBP target of ≥130 mm Hg, an SBP target of <130 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70-0.87]) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-0.99]). Compared with an SBP target of <140 mm Hg, an intensive SBP target of <120 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.91]), but all-cause mortality was marginally insignificant (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.71-1.01]). Adverse events were significantly more likely in the intensive SBP target groups, but the absolute risks were low.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis study suggests targeting an SBP <130 mm Hg significantly reduces the risks of major CVD and all-cause mortality. The findings also support an SBP target of <120 mm Hg, based on a smaller number of trials.\r\n\r\nREGISTRATION\r\nURL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42023490693.","PeriodicalId":13042,"journal":{"name":"Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.124.23597","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering reduces major cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. However, the optimal target for SBP lowering remains controversial. METHODS We included trials with random allocation to an SBP <130 mm Hg treatment target and CVD as the primary outcome. Data were extracted from each study independently and in duplicate using a standardized protocol. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for CVD and all-cause mortality comparing SBP <130 and ≥130 mm Hg treatment targets. A secondary analysis compared the same outcomes for randomization to an SBP target of <120 or <140 mm Hg. RESULTS Seven trials, including 72 138 participants, met the eligibility criteria. Compared with an SBP target of ≥130 mm Hg, an SBP target of <130 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70-0.87]) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-0.99]). Compared with an SBP target of <140 mm Hg, an intensive SBP target of <120 mm Hg significantly reduced major CVD (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74-0.91]), but all-cause mortality was marginally insignificant (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.71-1.01]). Adverse events were significantly more likely in the intensive SBP target groups, but the absolute risks were low. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests targeting an SBP <130 mm Hg significantly reduces the risks of major CVD and all-cause mortality. The findings also support an SBP target of <120 mm Hg, based on a smaller number of trials. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42023490693.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最佳抗高血压收缩压:系统综述与元分析》。
背景降低收缩压(SBP)可减少主要心血管疾病(CVD)和全因死亡率。方法我们纳入了随机分配 SBP <130 mm Hg 治疗目标和以心血管疾病为主要结局的试验。采用标准化方案从每项研究中独立提取数据,一式两份。通过随机效应荟萃分析,得出了对比 SBP <130 mm Hg 和 ≥130 mm Hg 治疗目标的心血管疾病和全因死亡率的危险比 (HRs) 和 95% CIs。一项二次分析比较了随机设定 SBP 目标值为 <120 或 <140 mm Hg 时的相同结果。与 SBP 目标值≥130 mm Hg 相比,SBP 目标值<130 mm Hg 可显著降低主要心血管疾病(HR,0.78 [95% CI,0.70-0.87])和全因死亡率(HR,0.89 [95% CI,0.79-0.99])。与 SBP 小于 140 mm Hg 的目标值相比,SBP 小于 120 mm Hg 的强化目标值可显著降低主要心血管疾病的发生率(HR,0.82 [95% CI,0.74-0.91]),但全因死亡率略微不显著(HR,0.85 [95% CI,0.71-1.01])。本研究表明,SBP <130 mm Hg 可显著降低主要心血管疾病和全因死亡的风险。基于较少的试验,研究结果还支持将 SBP 目标值定为 <120 mm Hg。REGISTRATIONURL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier:CRD42023490693。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hypertension
Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1006
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hypertension presents top-tier articles on high blood pressure in each monthly release. These articles delve into basic science, clinical treatment, and prevention of hypertension and associated cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal conditions. Renowned for their lasting significance, these papers contribute to advancing our understanding and management of hypertension-related issues.
期刊最新文献
Systolic Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Health, and Neurocognitive in Adolescents. Dysregulated Mitochondrial Calcium Causes Spiral Artery Remodeling Failure in Preeclampsia. Optimal Antihypertensive Systolic Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hypertension-Associated Expenditures Among Privately Insured US Adults in 2021. Genetic Variance in Heparan Sulfation Is Associated With Salt Sensitivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1