Development and evaluation of a low-literacy scale for estimating insulin correction dose for hyperglycemia among children with type 1 diabetes

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s13410-024-01387-5
Latika Rohilla, Devi Dayal, Prahbhjot Malhi, Bhavneet Bharti
{"title":"Development and evaluation of a low-literacy scale for estimating insulin correction dose for hyperglycemia among children with type 1 diabetes","authors":"Latika Rohilla, Devi Dayal, Prahbhjot Malhi, Bhavneet Bharti","doi":"10.1007/s13410-024-01387-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective </h3><p>Low-literacy parents of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) often fail to estimate insulin correction dose (ICD) for hyperglycemia, causing poor diabetes control. A tool to estimate ICD for hyperglycemia, which requires singling out glucometer readings digit-wise, was developed and evaluated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In this prospective trial, illiterate parent dyads of children with T1D were identified among all children admitted during January-March, 2022. They were sufficiently trained to use a “finger chart” for ICD determination for hyperglycemia. The “finger chart” requires singling out the glucometer readings digit-wise and then moving across the rows and columns to reach the needed ICD. Glycemic control was compared among participants using finger chart and the rest of the families at 3 and 6 months from baseline.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Twelve parent-dyads (28%) used finger chart (IG), and the rest 31 (72%) determined the ICD themselves (CG). More families in the IG lived in rural habitats (83.3% vs 58.1%) and had lower socio-economic status and maternal education (<i>p</i> 0.003, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). The body mass index, HbA1C, and frequency of low and high BGs were similar between the two groups at 3 months (<i>p</i> 0.71, 0.41, 0.78, 0.55, respectively) and 6 months (<i>p</i> 0.17, 0.69, 0.89, 0.30, respectively). Total daily insulin dose was higher in the IG at 3 months (<i>p</i> 0.003) but was comparable at 6 months (<i>p</i> 0.23).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This low-literacy tool can effectively help parents with low literacy in determining the ICD among children with T1D. This tool can be used in other low-literacy settings for ICD determination by suitable translation in local languages.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial registration</h3><p>Prior ethical approval was obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) (INT/IEC/2021/SPL-252 dated 13 February, 2021). The trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India. Registration number: CTRI/2021/04/032739, Registered on 12 April, 2021, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=52647&amp;EncHid=&amp;userName=Type%201%20diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-024-01387-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective 

Low-literacy parents of children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) often fail to estimate insulin correction dose (ICD) for hyperglycemia, causing poor diabetes control. A tool to estimate ICD for hyperglycemia, which requires singling out glucometer readings digit-wise, was developed and evaluated.

Methods

In this prospective trial, illiterate parent dyads of children with T1D were identified among all children admitted during January-March, 2022. They were sufficiently trained to use a “finger chart” for ICD determination for hyperglycemia. The “finger chart” requires singling out the glucometer readings digit-wise and then moving across the rows and columns to reach the needed ICD. Glycemic control was compared among participants using finger chart and the rest of the families at 3 and 6 months from baseline.

Results

Twelve parent-dyads (28%) used finger chart (IG), and the rest 31 (72%) determined the ICD themselves (CG). More families in the IG lived in rural habitats (83.3% vs 58.1%) and had lower socio-economic status and maternal education (p 0.003, p < 0.001, respectively). The body mass index, HbA1C, and frequency of low and high BGs were similar between the two groups at 3 months (p 0.71, 0.41, 0.78, 0.55, respectively) and 6 months (p 0.17, 0.69, 0.89, 0.30, respectively). Total daily insulin dose was higher in the IG at 3 months (p 0.003) but was comparable at 6 months (p 0.23).

Conclusion

This low-literacy tool can effectively help parents with low literacy in determining the ICD among children with T1D. This tool can be used in other low-literacy settings for ICD determination by suitable translation in local languages.

Trial registration

Prior ethical approval was obtained from the Institute Ethics Committee, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) (INT/IEC/2021/SPL-252 dated 13 February, 2021). The trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India. Registration number: CTRI/2021/04/032739, Registered on 12 April, 2021, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=52647&EncHid=&userName=Type%201%20diabetes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和评估用于估算 1 型糖尿病儿童高血糖胰岛素校正剂量的低识字量表
目的 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患儿的低文化程度父母往往无法估算高血糖时的胰岛素校正剂量(ICD),导致糖尿病控制不佳。方法在这项前瞻性试验中,从 2022 年 1 月至 3 月期间收治的所有 T1D 患儿中筛选出文盲患儿父母。他们接受了充分的培训,以使用 "手指图表 "来确定 ICD 是否为高血糖。使用 "手指图表 "需要将血糖仪读数按数字顺序排列,然后在行和列之间移动,以获得所需的 ICD。从基线开始 3 个月和 6 个月时,对使用手指图表的参与者和其他家庭的血糖控制情况进行了比较。结果12 个家长小组(28%)使用了手指图表(IG),其余 31 个家庭(72%)自己确定了 ICD(CG)。IG中更多的家庭居住在农村(83.3%对58.1%),社会经济地位和母亲受教育程度较低(分别为P 0.003和P < 0.001)。在 3 个月(p 分别为 0.71、0.41、0.78、0.55)和 6 个月(p 分别为 0.17、0.69、0.89、0.30)时,两组的体重指数、HbA1C 以及低血糖和高血糖频率相似。在 3 个月时,IG 的每日胰岛素总剂量较高(P 0.003),但在 6 个月时,IG 的每日胰岛素总剂量与 IG 相当(P 0.23)。试验注册事先获得了研究生医学教育与研究学院(PGIMER)学院伦理委员会的伦理批准(2021 年 2 月 13 日 INT/IEC/2021/SPL-252)。该试验已在印度临床试验注册处注册。注册号CTRI/2021/04/032739,注册日期为 2021 年 4 月 12 日,http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=52647&EncHid=&userName=Type%201%20diabetes。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries is the official journal of Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India. This is a peer reviewed journal and targets a readership consisting of clinicians, research workers, paramedical personnel, nutritionists and health care personnel working in the field of diabetes. Original research articles focusing on clinical and patient care issues including newer therapies and technologies as well as basic science issues in this field are considered for publication in the journal. Systematic reviews of interest to the above group of readers are also accepted.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors among Alavi Bohra adult women Enhancing comprehensive diabetic care: A smartphone fundus camera with an offline AI-powered diabetic retinopathy screening solution for physicians Usefulness of sudomotor function assessment in individuals with type-2 diabetes: A case–control study The effect of high-concentration CO2-enriched water on sensory neuropathy in patients with diabetes referred to an endocrine clinic Clinical profile of monogenic diabetes: A case series from a single South Indian diabetes clinic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1