Polypseudophakia: from “Piggyback” to supplementary sulcus-fixated IOLs

Ramin Khoramnia, Guenal Kahraman, Michael Amon, Grzegorz Łabuz, Isabella D. Baur, Gerd U. Auffarth
{"title":"Polypseudophakia: from “Piggyback” to supplementary sulcus-fixated IOLs","authors":"Ramin Khoramnia, Guenal Kahraman, Michael Amon, Grzegorz Łabuz, Isabella D. Baur, Gerd U. Auffarth","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06618-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Polypseudophakia, the concept of using a second intraocular lens (IOL) to supplement an IOL that has already been placed in the capsular bag, was first used as a corrective measure where the power requirement was higher than that of available single IOLs. Subsequently, the technique was modified to compensate for post-operative residual refractive errors. In these early cases, an IOL designed for the capsular bag would be implanted in the sulcus. Although these approaches were less than ideal, alternative means of correcting residual refractive errors were not without their limitations: IOL exchange can be traumatic to the eye and is not easily carried out once fibrosis has occurred, while corneal refractive surgical techniques are not suitable for all patients. Piggyback implantation was the term first coined to describe the use of two IOLs, placed together in the capsular bag. The term was later extended to include the procedure where an IOL designed for the capsular bag was placed in the sulcus. Unfortunately, the term piggyback has persisted even though these two approaches have been largely discredited. Intraocular lenses are now available which have been specifically designed for placement in the ciliary sulcus. As these newer IOLs avoid the many unacceptable complications brought about by both types of earlier piggyback implantation, it is time to employ a new terminology, such as supplementary IOL or secondary enhancement to distinguish between the placement of an unsuitable capsular bag IOL in the sulcus and the implantation of an IOL specifically designed for ciliary sulcus implantation. In addition to minimising possible complications, supplementary IOLs designed for the sulcus have expanded the options available to the ophthalmic surgeon. With these new IOLs it is possible to correct presbyopia and residual astigmatism, and to provide temporary correction of refractive errors in growing, or unstable, eyes. This article aims to review the literature available on supplementary IOL implantation in the ciliary sulcus and to summarise the evidence for the efficacy and safety of this intervention.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Key messages</h3><p><b><i>What is known</i></b></p><ul>\n<li>\n<p>Polypseudophakia has been used for over 30 years to correct hyperopia or residual refractive error, but early techniques were associated with significant complications.</p>\n</li>\n</ul><p><b><i>What is new</i></b></p><ul>\n<li>\n<p>The development of specially designed sulcus-fixated supplementary IOLs significantly reduces the risks associated with these procedures, and has also opened up new opportunities in patient care.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The reversibility of the procedure allows patients to experience multifocality, and to provide temporary and adjustable correction in unstable or growing eyes.</p>\n</li>\n<li>\n<p>The terms “secondary enhancement” or “DUET” to describe supplementary IOL implantation are preferential to “piggyback”.</p>\n</li>\n</ul>","PeriodicalId":12748,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06618-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polypseudophakia, the concept of using a second intraocular lens (IOL) to supplement an IOL that has already been placed in the capsular bag, was first used as a corrective measure where the power requirement was higher than that of available single IOLs. Subsequently, the technique was modified to compensate for post-operative residual refractive errors. In these early cases, an IOL designed for the capsular bag would be implanted in the sulcus. Although these approaches were less than ideal, alternative means of correcting residual refractive errors were not without their limitations: IOL exchange can be traumatic to the eye and is not easily carried out once fibrosis has occurred, while corneal refractive surgical techniques are not suitable for all patients. Piggyback implantation was the term first coined to describe the use of two IOLs, placed together in the capsular bag. The term was later extended to include the procedure where an IOL designed for the capsular bag was placed in the sulcus. Unfortunately, the term piggyback has persisted even though these two approaches have been largely discredited. Intraocular lenses are now available which have been specifically designed for placement in the ciliary sulcus. As these newer IOLs avoid the many unacceptable complications brought about by both types of earlier piggyback implantation, it is time to employ a new terminology, such as supplementary IOL or secondary enhancement to distinguish between the placement of an unsuitable capsular bag IOL in the sulcus and the implantation of an IOL specifically designed for ciliary sulcus implantation. In addition to minimising possible complications, supplementary IOLs designed for the sulcus have expanded the options available to the ophthalmic surgeon. With these new IOLs it is possible to correct presbyopia and residual astigmatism, and to provide temporary correction of refractive errors in growing, or unstable, eyes. This article aims to review the literature available on supplementary IOL implantation in the ciliary sulcus and to summarise the evidence for the efficacy and safety of this intervention.

Key messages

What is known

  • Polypseudophakia has been used for over 30 years to correct hyperopia or residual refractive error, but early techniques were associated with significant complications.

What is new

  • The development of specially designed sulcus-fixated supplementary IOLs significantly reduces the risks associated with these procedures, and has also opened up new opportunities in patient care.

  • The reversibility of the procedure allows patients to experience multifocality, and to provide temporary and adjustable correction in unstable or growing eyes.

  • The terms “secondary enhancement” or “DUET” to describe supplementary IOL implantation are preferential to “piggyback”.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性假性角膜病:从 "猪背式 "到辅助沟固定式人工晶体
摘要 假性角膜屈光不正(polypseudophakia)的概念是使用第二个眼内人工晶体(IOL)来补充已放入囊袋的人工晶体,它最初是作为一种矫正措施,用于矫正功率要求高于现有单个人工晶体的情况。随后,该技术进行了改进,以补偿术后残余屈光不正。在这些早期病例中,专为囊袋设计的人工晶体被植入沟内。虽然这些方法并不理想,但其他矫正残余屈光不正的方法也并非没有局限性:人工晶体置换可能会对眼睛造成创伤,而且一旦发生纤维化就不容易进行,而角膜屈光手术技术也并非适合所有患者。背负式人工晶体植入术(Piggyback implantation)这一术语最早是用来描述将两个人工晶体一起植入囊袋的情况。后来,该术语被扩展到包括将设计用于囊袋的人工晶体植入沟内的手术。遗憾的是,尽管这两种方法在很大程度上已被否定,但 "背负式 "一词却一直存在。现在已经有了专门设计用于在睫状沟内放置的人工晶体。由于这些较新的人工晶体避免了早期两种背负式植入术带来的许多不可接受的并发症,因此现在应该使用新的术语,如补充人工晶体或二次增强,以区分在沟内植入不合适的囊袋人工晶体和植入专门为睫状沟植入设计的人工晶体。除了最大限度地减少可能出现的并发症外,专为睫状沟设计的辅助人工晶体还扩大了眼科医生的选择范围。使用这些新型人工晶体可以矫正老花眼和残余散光,还可以暂时矫正发育期或不稳定眼球的屈光不正。本文旨在回顾有关在睫状沟植入辅助性人工晶体的现有文献,并总结这种干预措施的有效性和安全性的证据。已知信息聚假性角膜用于矫正远视或残余屈光不正已有 30 多年的历史,但早期的技术与严重的并发症有关。这种手术的可逆性让患者体验到多焦点性,并为不稳定或成长中的眼睛提供临时和可调整的矫正。"二次增强 "或 "DUET "是描述辅助人工晶体植入术的术语,优于 "搭载"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital health and wearable devices for retinal disease monitoring Safety and efficacy of laser trabeculoplasty compared to drug therapy for the management of open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis study Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and retinal pseudodrusen in an elderly population. The ural very old study Interpretation of SD-OCT imaging data in real-life conditions versus standardized reading centre analysis in eyes with diabetic macular oedema or macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: 24-month follow-up of the ORCA study Freiburg vision test (FrACT): optimal number of trials?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1