Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor vs gas-liquid slug flow

IF 3.4 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Reaction Chemistry & Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1039/d4re00287c
Agnieszka Ladosz, Astrid Friedli, Arnaud Lhuillery, Georg Rueedi
{"title":"Carbonylations in flow: tube-in-tube reactor vs gas-liquid slug flow","authors":"Agnieszka Ladosz, Astrid Friedli, Arnaud Lhuillery, Georg Rueedi","doi":"10.1039/d4re00287c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup. We found that the two-phase slug flow reactor significantly improved the yield and throughput of the reactions tested. First, we performed a reference reaction, methoxycarbonylation of 4-chlorobenzonitrile, using conditions described in literature and obtained 57% calculated yield in biphasic setup and 16% in the tube-in-tube setup, with side product formation of 1% and 8% respectively. The reaction was further optimized in both apparatuses, improving the yield in the biphasic setup to 86%, while the tube-in-tube method was limited to about 34%. Finally, a 1.5 g scale-up of a project-relevant building block yielded 73% of product in the tube-in-tube setup vs 92% when two-phase flow was used, with more than ten-fold increase in throughput in the biphasic method. Using gas-liquid flow enabled higher yield and throughput due to direct contact of gas and liquid, better control of CO equivalents and intensification of process conditions: higher temperature, pressure and concentration in the system and significant reduction of residence time.","PeriodicalId":101,"journal":{"name":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reaction Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4re00287c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to improve the performance of carbonylation reactions in flow we compared the tube-in-tube system to a gas-liquid two-phase setup. We found that the two-phase slug flow reactor significantly improved the yield and throughput of the reactions tested. First, we performed a reference reaction, methoxycarbonylation of 4-chlorobenzonitrile, using conditions described in literature and obtained 57% calculated yield in biphasic setup and 16% in the tube-in-tube setup, with side product formation of 1% and 8% respectively. The reaction was further optimized in both apparatuses, improving the yield in the biphasic setup to 86%, while the tube-in-tube method was limited to about 34%. Finally, a 1.5 g scale-up of a project-relevant building block yielded 73% of product in the tube-in-tube setup vs 92% when two-phase flow was used, with more than ten-fold increase in throughput in the biphasic method. Using gas-liquid flow enabled higher yield and throughput due to direct contact of gas and liquid, better control of CO equivalents and intensification of process conditions: higher temperature, pressure and concentration in the system and significant reduction of residence time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流动中的羰基化:管中管反应器与气液蛞蝓流
为了提高流动羰基化反应的性能,我们将管中管系统与气液两相装置进行了比较。我们发现,两相蛞蝓流反应器显著提高了测试反应的产率和吞吐量。首先,我们使用文献中描述的条件进行了一个参考反应,即 4-氯苯腈的甲氧基羰基化反应,在双相装置中获得了 57% 的计算收率,在管中管装置中获得了 16%,副产物生成率分别为 1%和 8%。在这两种装置中对反应进行了进一步优化,将双相装置中的产率提高到 86%,而管中管法的产率限制在 34%左右。最后,将与项目相关的构筑基块放大 1.5 克后,管中管装置的产率为 73%,而使用两相流装置的产率为 92%,双相法的产量提高了 10 倍以上。由于气体和液体直接接触、更好地控制一氧化碳当量以及强化工艺条件:系统中更高的温度、压力和浓度以及显著缩短停留时间,使用气液两相流可提高产量和吞吐量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering
Reaction Chemistry & Engineering Chemistry-Chemistry (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
227
期刊介绍: Reaction Chemistry & Engineering is a new journal reporting cutting edge research into all aspects of making molecules for the benefit of fundamental research, applied processes and wider society. From fundamental, molecular-level chemistry to large scale chemical production, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering brings together communities of chemists and chemical engineers working to ensure the crucial role of reaction chemistry in today’s world.
期刊最新文献
Back cover Immobilization of cationic dye on photoluminescent hydroxyapatite particles through a citric acid bonding layer† Back cover Application of the Three-Reactor Hydrogenation Process in the Recycling Utilization of Waste Lubricating Oil and Study on the Catalyst Deactivation Mechanism Flexible carbon fibres with magnetic ZIF-67 as core layer and in-situ grown NiMn-LDH nanosheets as shell layer for microwaves absorption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1