Cattle exclusion increases encounters of wild herbivores in Neotropical forests

IF 5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal of Applied Ecology Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/1365-2664.14751
Juliana Vélez, William McShea, Budhan Pukazhenthi, Juan David Rodríguez, María Fernanda Suárez, José Manuel Torres, César Barrera, John Fieberg
{"title":"Cattle exclusion increases encounters of wild herbivores in Neotropical forests","authors":"Juliana Vélez, William McShea, Budhan Pukazhenthi, Juan David Rodríguez, María Fernanda Suárez, José Manuel Torres, César Barrera, John Fieberg","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.14751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Ongoing habitat loss and species extinctions require managers to implement and quantify the effectiveness of conservation actions for protecting biodiversity. Fencing, when done properly, is an important management tool for conservation in landscapes where wildlife and domestic animals co‐occur, potentially enhancing habitat use through selective exclusion of domestic species. For instance, the fencing of forest patches in the Neotropics is expected to reduce the degradation of understory vegetation by cattle, releasing these resources for the native community of browsers and fruit consumers.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Here, we implemented an ecological experiment using a before‐after control‐impact design to quantify the effect of cattle exclusion on encounter probability of the native community of browsers and fruit consumers, and percent ground cover in multifunctional landscapes of the Colombian Orinoquía. We built 14 km of wildlife‐permeable fences along forest edges in four forest patches (i.e. blocks) containing control and fenced (treatment) sites. We installed 33 camera traps to obtain information about wildlife and cattle encounter probabilities, before and after the fences were constructed. We used Bayesian generalised linear mixed effects models to quantify the effect of fences via the interaction between the time period (before and after the fences were built) and treatment (control or fenced sites).</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Fencing was effective at reducing encounter probabilities of cattle in the treated sites, and it had a positive impact on relative encounter probabilities of four of seven studied wildlife species (herbivores including the black agouti [dry season only], lowland tapir [dry season only] and spotted paca [both seasons] and an omnivore, the South American coati [rainy season only]). The effect of fencing was negative for the collared peccary but only during the dry season. No statistically significant effect was detected for the white‐lipped peccary or white‐tailed deer.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis and applications</jats:italic>: We provide experimental evidence that fences are effective at selectively excluding cattle and increasing encounter rates of wild browsers and fruit consumers in forest patches where these species co‐occur with cattle. Our results highlight an important application of fencing ecology in Neotropical forests, where the implementation of wildlife‐permeable fences is feasible due to smaller body sizes of wildlife compared to domestic animals such as cattle.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":15016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14751","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ongoing habitat loss and species extinctions require managers to implement and quantify the effectiveness of conservation actions for protecting biodiversity. Fencing, when done properly, is an important management tool for conservation in landscapes where wildlife and domestic animals co‐occur, potentially enhancing habitat use through selective exclusion of domestic species. For instance, the fencing of forest patches in the Neotropics is expected to reduce the degradation of understory vegetation by cattle, releasing these resources for the native community of browsers and fruit consumers. Here, we implemented an ecological experiment using a before‐after control‐impact design to quantify the effect of cattle exclusion on encounter probability of the native community of browsers and fruit consumers, and percent ground cover in multifunctional landscapes of the Colombian Orinoquía. We built 14 km of wildlife‐permeable fences along forest edges in four forest patches (i.e. blocks) containing control and fenced (treatment) sites. We installed 33 camera traps to obtain information about wildlife and cattle encounter probabilities, before and after the fences were constructed. We used Bayesian generalised linear mixed effects models to quantify the effect of fences via the interaction between the time period (before and after the fences were built) and treatment (control or fenced sites). Fencing was effective at reducing encounter probabilities of cattle in the treated sites, and it had a positive impact on relative encounter probabilities of four of seven studied wildlife species (herbivores including the black agouti [dry season only], lowland tapir [dry season only] and spotted paca [both seasons] and an omnivore, the South American coati [rainy season only]). The effect of fencing was negative for the collared peccary but only during the dry season. No statistically significant effect was detected for the white‐lipped peccary or white‐tailed deer. Synthesis and applications: We provide experimental evidence that fences are effective at selectively excluding cattle and increasing encounter rates of wild browsers and fruit consumers in forest patches where these species co‐occur with cattle. Our results highlight an important application of fencing ecology in Neotropical forests, where the implementation of wildlife‐permeable fences is feasible due to smaller body sizes of wildlife compared to domestic animals such as cattle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放牛增加了新热带森林中野生食草动物的遭遇次数
持续的栖息地丧失和物种灭绝要求管理者实施并量化保护生物多样性行动的有效性。在野生动物和家养动物共存的景观中,围栏如果操作得当,是一种重要的保护管理工具,有可能通过选择性地排除家养物种来提高栖息地的利用率。例如,在新热带地区的森林中设置围栏有望减少牛群对林下植被的破坏,从而将这些资源释放给本地的食草动物和果实消费者。在此,我们采用前后对照-影响设计实施了一项生态实验,以量化牛群隔离对哥伦比亚奥里诺基亚多功能景观中本地食草动物和果实消费者群落相遇概率以及地面覆盖率的影响。我们在包含对照区和围栏区(处理区)的四个森林斑块(即区块)中沿森林边缘修建了 14 公里长的野生动物防渗围栏。我们安装了 33 个相机陷阱,以获取围栏建成前后野生动物和牛群相遇概率的信息。我们使用贝叶斯广义线性混合效应模型,通过时间段(围栏建成前后)与处理(对照区或围栏区)之间的交互作用来量化围栏的效果。围栏能有效降低牛群在处理地点的相遇概率,对所研究的七种野生动物中的四种(食草动物,包括黑髭猿 [仅旱季]、低地貘 [仅旱季] 和斑蟒 [两季] 以及杂食动物南美浣熊 [仅雨季])的相对相遇概率产生了积极影响。围栏对领啄木鸟的影响是负面的,但仅限于旱季。对白唇山雀和白尾鹿的影响在统计学上不明显。综述与应用:我们提供的实验证据表明,在野生食草动物和果实消费者与牛共生的森林斑块中,围栏能有效地选择性地将牛排除在外,并提高这些物种的相遇率。我们的研究结果突显了围栏生态学在新热带森林中的重要应用,由于野生动物的体型小于牛等家畜,因此在新热带森林中实施野生动物可渗透围栏是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Ecology
Journal of Applied Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
3.50%
发文量
229
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Ecology publishes novel, high-impact papers on the interface between ecological science and the management of biological resources.The editors encourage contributions that use applied ecological problems to test and develop basic theory, although there must be clear potential for impact on the management of the environment.
期刊最新文献
Soil seedbanks are shaped by the timing of fires in a Mediterranean‐type ecosystem Cattle exclusion increases encounters of wild herbivores in Neotropical forests Human impacts mediate freshwater invertebrate community responses to and recovery from drought Light quality and spatial variability influences on seedling regeneration in Hawaiian lowland wet forests Landscape connectivity for African elephants in the world's largest transfrontier conservation area: A collaborative, multi‐scalar assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1