The effects of different pretreatment technologies on microbial community in anaerobic digestion process: A systematic review

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1007/s40201-024-00917-x
Hasan Pasalari, Hamed Gharibi, Siamak Darvishali, Mahdi Farzadkia
{"title":"The effects of different pretreatment technologies on microbial community in anaerobic digestion process: A systematic review","authors":"Hasan Pasalari, Hamed Gharibi, Siamak Darvishali, Mahdi Farzadkia","doi":"10.1007/s40201-024-00917-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Here we comprehensively review the available knowledge on effects of different pretreatment technologies on microbial population and microbial dynamics in anaerobic digestion (AD) fed with different substrates and different operational parameters. To identify peer-reviewed studies published in English-language journals, a comprehensive search was performed across multiple electronic databases. The eligible studies were analyzed to extract data and information pertaining to the configuration of anaerobic reactors, operational parameters, and various pretreatment processes such as chemical, biological, enzymatic, thermal, microaerobic, and ultrasonic. The findings derived from this current review demonstrated that different chemical, biological, and physical pretreatment technologies improve the biomethane potential (BMP) and potentially affect the dominant bacteria and archaea. Moreover, although hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis are more observed due to resistance to extreme conditions, methane production follows both aceticlastic and hydrogenotrophic pathways in AD assisted with different pretreatment process. <i>Firmicutes</i> and <i>Bacteroidetes</i> phyla of bacteria were the dominant hydrolytic bacteria due to synergetic effects of different pretreatment process on solubilization and bioavailability of recalcitrant substrates. In summary, a holistic understanding on bacteria and archaea communities, along with the mechanisms of the dominant microorganisms leads to enhanced stability and overall performance of anaerobic digestion (AD) processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":628,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-024-00917-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Here we comprehensively review the available knowledge on effects of different pretreatment technologies on microbial population and microbial dynamics in anaerobic digestion (AD) fed with different substrates and different operational parameters. To identify peer-reviewed studies published in English-language journals, a comprehensive search was performed across multiple electronic databases. The eligible studies were analyzed to extract data and information pertaining to the configuration of anaerobic reactors, operational parameters, and various pretreatment processes such as chemical, biological, enzymatic, thermal, microaerobic, and ultrasonic. The findings derived from this current review demonstrated that different chemical, biological, and physical pretreatment technologies improve the biomethane potential (BMP) and potentially affect the dominant bacteria and archaea. Moreover, although hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis are more observed due to resistance to extreme conditions, methane production follows both aceticlastic and hydrogenotrophic pathways in AD assisted with different pretreatment process. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla of bacteria were the dominant hydrolytic bacteria due to synergetic effects of different pretreatment process on solubilization and bioavailability of recalcitrant substrates. In summary, a holistic understanding on bacteria and archaea communities, along with the mechanisms of the dominant microorganisms leads to enhanced stability and overall performance of anaerobic digestion (AD) processes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同预处理技术对厌氧消化过程中微生物群落的影响:系统综述
在此,我们全面回顾了关于不同预处理技术对以不同基质和不同操作参数为原料的厌氧消化(AD)中微生物数量和微生物动态的影响的现有知识。为了确定发表在英文期刊上的同行评审研究,我们在多个电子数据库中进行了全面检索。对符合条件的研究进行了分析,以提取与厌氧反应器的配置、运行参数以及化学、生物、酶、热、微厌氧和超声波等各种预处理工艺有关的数据和信息。本综述的研究结果表明,不同的化学、生物和物理预处理技术可提高生物甲烷潜能(BMP),并对优势细菌和古细菌产生潜在影响。此外,尽管由于对极端条件的耐受性而更多地观察到养氢型甲烷生成,但在采用不同预处理工艺的厌氧消化(AD)中,甲烷的生成同时遵循醋酸型和养氢型途径。由于不同预处理工艺对难降解基质的溶解性和生物利用率具有协同作用,因此固着菌门和类杆菌门是主要的水解细菌。总之,全面了解细菌和古细菌群落以及优势微生物的作用机制,可提高厌氧消化(AD)工艺的稳定性和整体性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering is a peer-reviewed journal presenting timely research on all aspects of environmental health science, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: -Water pollution and treatment -Wastewater treatment and reuse -Air control -Soil remediation -Noise and radiation control -Environmental biotechnology and nanotechnology -Food safety and hygiene
期刊最新文献
Polystyrene nanoplastics: optimized removal using magnetic nano-adsorbent and toxicity assessment in zebrafish embryos The effects of different pretreatment technologies on microbial community in anaerobic digestion process: A systematic review Production of biosurfactant by Bacillus megaterieum using agro-food wastes and its application in petroleum sludge oil recovery Investigations on the surface disinfection efficacy of far-UVC 222 nm germicidal irradiance device in a controlled environment and field test Determining the optimization of seawater concentrate discharge of coastal desalination plants into the marine environment, based on numerical modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1