Estimation of confined compressive strength of LRS‐FRP concrete specimens with computational intelligence

Sleek Chang, Harish Chandra Arora, Aman Kumar, Denise‐Penelope N. Kontoni, Prashant Kumar, Nishant Raj Kapoor, Jagbir Singh
{"title":"Estimation of confined compressive strength of LRS‐FRP concrete specimens with computational intelligence","authors":"Sleek Chang, Harish Chandra Arora, Aman Kumar, Denise‐Penelope N. Kontoni, Prashant Kumar, Nishant Raj Kapoor, Jagbir Singh","doi":"10.1002/zamm.202400455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reinforced concrete structures deteriorate due to changes in temperature, corrosion, and attacks of sulfate and chloride contents. Retrofitting techniques like fiber‐reinforced polymer (FRP) jacketing, known for their strength and corrosion resistance, are increasingly used to strengthen and retrofit deteriorated structural elements. Large rupture strain (LRS)‐FRP composite, composed of polyethylene terephthalate and polyethylene naphthalate, both of which have high tensile strength and high strain at rupture have been used in the studies of many researchers. This research aims to develop a reliable and accurate machine learning (ML) model to estimate the compressive strength of LRS‐FRP confined specimens. A total of 303 LRS‐FRP confined specimens were gathered after a thorough literature review to develop ML models, utilizing the linear regression, support vector regression, regression tree, and artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms. Additionally, 44 analytical models (AMs) were used to compare the performance of the developed ML models. The results revealed that the performance of the developed ANN model was higher among all the ML and AMs. The <jats:italic>R</jats:italic>‐value and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) value of the developed ANN model were 0.9822 and 6.17%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis results show that the height of the specimens had the highest impact followed by the diameter of the specimen, the number of FRP layers and thickness, and then the tensile strength of LRS‐FRP. The ANN‐based mathematical expression is simple and easy to use to predict the compressive strength of the LRS‐FRP strengthened specimens.","PeriodicalId":501230,"journal":{"name":"ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZAMM - Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202400455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforced concrete structures deteriorate due to changes in temperature, corrosion, and attacks of sulfate and chloride contents. Retrofitting techniques like fiber‐reinforced polymer (FRP) jacketing, known for their strength and corrosion resistance, are increasingly used to strengthen and retrofit deteriorated structural elements. Large rupture strain (LRS)‐FRP composite, composed of polyethylene terephthalate and polyethylene naphthalate, both of which have high tensile strength and high strain at rupture have been used in the studies of many researchers. This research aims to develop a reliable and accurate machine learning (ML) model to estimate the compressive strength of LRS‐FRP confined specimens. A total of 303 LRS‐FRP confined specimens were gathered after a thorough literature review to develop ML models, utilizing the linear regression, support vector regression, regression tree, and artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms. Additionally, 44 analytical models (AMs) were used to compare the performance of the developed ML models. The results revealed that the performance of the developed ANN model was higher among all the ML and AMs. The R‐value and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) value of the developed ANN model were 0.9822 and 6.17%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis results show that the height of the specimens had the highest impact followed by the diameter of the specimen, the number of FRP layers and thickness, and then the tensile strength of LRS‐FRP. The ANN‐based mathematical expression is simple and easy to use to predict the compressive strength of the LRS‐FRP strengthened specimens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用计算智能估算 LRS-FRP 混凝土试件的约束抗压强度
钢筋混凝土结构会因温度变化、腐蚀以及硫酸盐和氯化物的侵蚀而老化。以强度和耐腐蚀性著称的纤维增强聚合物(FRP)护套等改造技术越来越多地被用于加固和改造老化的结构构件。由聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯和聚萘二甲酸乙二醇酯组成的大断裂应变(LRS)-FRP 复合材料具有高抗拉强度和高断裂应变,已被许多研究人员采用。本研究旨在开发一种可靠、准确的机器学习(ML)模型,用于估算 LRS-FRP 承压试样的抗压强度。在全面查阅文献后,共收集了 303 个 LRS-FRP 承压试样,并利用线性回归、支持向量回归、回归树和人工神经网络 (ANN) 算法开发了 ML 模型。此外,还使用了 44 个分析模型(AM)来比较已开发 ML 模型的性能。结果显示,在所有 ML 和 AM 中,所开发的 ANN 模型性能更高。所开发的 ANN 模型的 R 值和平均绝对百分比误差 (MAPE) 值分别为 0.9822 和 6.17%。灵敏度分析结果表明,试样高度的影响最大,其次是试样直径、玻璃钢层数和厚度,然后是 LRS-FRP 的抗拉强度。基于 ANN 的数学表达式简单易用,可用于预测 LRS-FRP 加固试样的抗压强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flow around a slender body with sharp edges Heat transfer analysis of a peristaltically induced creeping magnetohydrodynamic flow through an inclined annulus using homotopy perturbation method Mathematical modeling of convective heat transfer enhancement using circular cylinders in an inverted T‐shaped porous enclosure Numerical simulation of melting heat transport mechanism of Cross nanofluid with multiple features of infinite shear rate over a Falkner‐Skan wedge surface Wave scattering in a cracked exponentially graded magnetoelectroelastic half‐plane
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1