CLVSim: A comprehensive framework for crewed lunar vehicle simulation—Modeling and applications

IF 4.2 2区 计算机科学 Q2 ROBOTICS Journal of Field Robotics Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1002/rob.22421
Qingning Lan, Liang Ding, Huaiguang Yang, Lutz Richter, Zhengyin Wang, Haibo Gao, Zongquan Deng
{"title":"CLVSim: A comprehensive framework for crewed lunar vehicle simulation—Modeling and applications","authors":"Qingning Lan, Liang Ding, Huaiguang Yang, Lutz Richter, Zhengyin Wang, Haibo Gao, Zongquan Deng","doi":"10.1002/rob.22421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crewed lunar vehicles (CLVs) significantly enhance astronauts’ exploration range and efficiency on the moon, paving the way for more comprehensive scientific research. Utilizing computer simulations offers an effective alternative to conducting experiments in low‐gravity conditions if backed up by appropriate model validation. This study introduces a detailed simulation framework CLVSim (Crewed Lunar Vehicle Simulation), including subsystems of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) soft terrain, suspensions, motors, wheels, fenders, and driver. A high‐fidelity instance of CLVSim was modeled and benchmarked based on the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) from the “Apollo” program. Each subsystem was independently modeled and benchmarked based on the information from the Apollo handbook. These subsystems were then integrated to benchmark the overall operation of the CLV with experiment in a simulated lunar environment, with a mean relative error of 8.6%. The mean relative error between simulation and experiment for all subsystems and overall CLV test was less than 10%. Further applications of CLVSim were investigated. For instance, two fender designs were investigated to evaluate their effectiveness in mitigating dust emission from wheels. The vehicles’ performances were examined with four different configurations: a standard CLV on flat terrain, and CLVs with two types of suspension stiffness and torque coordination strategy driveline on rugged terrain. Comparing the maneuverability of CLVs with passive and differential drive to those with stiffer suspensions, there were approximately 9% and 7% savings in steering, respectively. The high fidelity and potential for advanced research of the simulation framework were demonstrated in areas like CLV mechanism design, dust prevention and control strategy design.","PeriodicalId":192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Field Robotics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Field Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.22421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crewed lunar vehicles (CLVs) significantly enhance astronauts’ exploration range and efficiency on the moon, paving the way for more comprehensive scientific research. Utilizing computer simulations offers an effective alternative to conducting experiments in low‐gravity conditions if backed up by appropriate model validation. This study introduces a detailed simulation framework CLVSim (Crewed Lunar Vehicle Simulation), including subsystems of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) soft terrain, suspensions, motors, wheels, fenders, and driver. A high‐fidelity instance of CLVSim was modeled and benchmarked based on the Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV) from the “Apollo” program. Each subsystem was independently modeled and benchmarked based on the information from the Apollo handbook. These subsystems were then integrated to benchmark the overall operation of the CLV with experiment in a simulated lunar environment, with a mean relative error of 8.6%. The mean relative error between simulation and experiment for all subsystems and overall CLV test was less than 10%. Further applications of CLVSim were investigated. For instance, two fender designs were investigated to evaluate their effectiveness in mitigating dust emission from wheels. The vehicles’ performances were examined with four different configurations: a standard CLV on flat terrain, and CLVs with two types of suspension stiffness and torque coordination strategy driveline on rugged terrain. Comparing the maneuverability of CLVs with passive and differential drive to those with stiffer suspensions, there were approximately 9% and 7% savings in steering, respectively. The high fidelity and potential for advanced research of the simulation framework were demonstrated in areas like CLV mechanism design, dust prevention and control strategy design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CLVSim:载人月球车模拟综合框架--建模与应用
载人月球车(CLV)大大提高了宇航员在月球上的探索范围和效率,为更全面的科学研究铺平了道路。如果有适当的模型验证作为支持,利用计算机模拟为在低重力条件下进行实验提供了一个有效的替代方案。本研究介绍了一个详细的模拟框架 CLVSim(载人月球车模拟),包括平滑粒子流体力学(SPH)软地形、悬挂、电机、车轮、挡泥板和驾驶员等子系统。以 "阿波罗 "计划中的月球巡回飞行器(LRV)为基础,对 CLVSim 的高保真实例进行了建模和基准测试。根据阿波罗手册中的信息,对每个子系统进行了独立建模和基准测试。然后将这些子系统整合在一起,在模拟月球环境中通过实验对 CLV 的整体运行情况进行基准测试,平均相对误差为 8.6%。所有子系统和整个 CLV 测试的模拟与实验之间的平均相对误差小于 10%。对 CLVSim 的进一步应用进行了研究。例如,研究了两种挡泥板设计,以评估它们在减少车轮灰尘排放方面的效果。对四种不同配置的车辆进行了性能测试:在平坦地形上的标准 CLV,以及在崎岖地形上具有两种悬挂刚度和扭矩协调策略的传动系统的 CLV。采用被动式和差动式驱动的 CLV 与采用较硬悬架的 CLV 的操纵性相比,分别节省了约 9% 和 7% 的转向费用。仿真框架的高保真性和先进研究的潜力已在 CLV 机构设计、粉尘预防和控制策略设计等领域得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Field Robotics
Journal of Field Robotics 工程技术-机器人学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Field Robotics seeks to promote scholarly publications dealing with the fundamentals of robotics in unstructured and dynamic environments. The Journal focuses on experimental robotics and encourages publication of work that has both theoretical and practical significance.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover Image, Volume 42, Number 1, January 2025 Back Cover, Volume 42, Number 1, January 2025 Issue Information Cover Image, Volume 41, Number 8, December 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1