Assessing the practical applicability of neural‐based point clouds registration algorithms: A comparative analysis

IF 4.2 2区 计算机科学 Q2 ROBOTICS Journal of Field Robotics Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1002/rob.22417
Simone Fontana, Federica Di Lauro, Domenico G. Sorrenti
{"title":"Assessing the practical applicability of neural‐based point clouds registration algorithms: A comparative analysis","authors":"Simone Fontana, Federica Di Lauro, Domenico G. Sorrenti","doi":"10.1002/rob.22417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Point cloud registration is a vital task in three‐dimensional (3D) perception, with several different applications in robotics. Recent advancements have introduced neural‐based techniques that promise enhanced accuracy and robustness. In this paper, we thoroughly evaluate well‐known neural‐based point cloud registration methods using the Point Clouds Registration Benchmark, which was developed to cover a large variety of use cases. Our evaluation focuses on the performance of these techniques when applied to real‐complex data, which presents a more challenging and realistic scenario than the simpler experiments typically conducted by the original authors. The results reveal considerable variability in performance across different techniques, highlighting the importance of assessing algorithms in realistic settings. Notably, 3DSmoothNet emerges as a standout solution, demonstrating good and consistent results across various data sets. Its efficacy, coupled with a relatively low graphics processing unit (GPU) memory footprint, makes it a promising choice for robotics applications, even if it is not yet suitable for real‐time applications due to its execution time. Fully Convolutional Geometric Features also performs well, albeit with greater variability among data sets. PREDATOR and GeoTransformer are promising, but demand substantial GPU memory, when handling large point clouds from the Point Clouds Registration Benchmark. A notable finding concerns the performance of Fast Point Feature Histograms, which exhibit results comparable to the best approaches while demanding minimal computational resources. Overall, this comparative analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of neural‐based registration techniques, both in terms of the quality of the results and the computational resources required. This helps researchers to make informed decisions for robotics applications.","PeriodicalId":192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Field Robotics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Field Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.22417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Point cloud registration is a vital task in three‐dimensional (3D) perception, with several different applications in robotics. Recent advancements have introduced neural‐based techniques that promise enhanced accuracy and robustness. In this paper, we thoroughly evaluate well‐known neural‐based point cloud registration methods using the Point Clouds Registration Benchmark, which was developed to cover a large variety of use cases. Our evaluation focuses on the performance of these techniques when applied to real‐complex data, which presents a more challenging and realistic scenario than the simpler experiments typically conducted by the original authors. The results reveal considerable variability in performance across different techniques, highlighting the importance of assessing algorithms in realistic settings. Notably, 3DSmoothNet emerges as a standout solution, demonstrating good and consistent results across various data sets. Its efficacy, coupled with a relatively low graphics processing unit (GPU) memory footprint, makes it a promising choice for robotics applications, even if it is not yet suitable for real‐time applications due to its execution time. Fully Convolutional Geometric Features also performs well, albeit with greater variability among data sets. PREDATOR and GeoTransformer are promising, but demand substantial GPU memory, when handling large point clouds from the Point Clouds Registration Benchmark. A notable finding concerns the performance of Fast Point Feature Histograms, which exhibit results comparable to the best approaches while demanding minimal computational resources. Overall, this comparative analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of neural‐based registration techniques, both in terms of the quality of the results and the computational resources required. This helps researchers to make informed decisions for robotics applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估基于神经的点云注册算法的实际应用性:比较分析
点云注册是三维(3D)感知中的一项重要任务,在机器人技术中有着多种不同的应用。近年来,基于神经的技术不断发展,有望提高精确度和鲁棒性。在本文中,我们使用 "点云注册基准"(Point Clouds Registration Benchmark)对著名的基于神经的点云注册方法进行了全面评估。我们的评估重点是这些技术应用于真实复杂数据时的性能,这比原作者通常进行的简单实验更具挑战性和现实性。结果显示,不同技术的性能差异相当大,这凸显了在现实环境中评估算法的重要性。值得注意的是,3DSmoothNet 是一个突出的解决方案,在各种数据集上都表现出了良好而一致的结果。它的功效加上相对较低的图形处理单元(GPU)内存占用,使其成为机器人应用的一个有前途的选择,尽管由于其执行时间,它还不适合实时应用。全卷积几何特征也表现出色,只是数据集之间的差异较大。PREDATOR 和 GeoTransformer 很有前途,但在处理 "点云注册基准 "中的大型点云时需要大量 GPU 内存。一个值得注意的发现是快速点特征直方图的性能,其结果与最好的方法不相上下,但对计算资源的要求极低。总之,这项比较分析为了解基于神经的配准技术在结果质量和所需计算资源方面的优势和局限性提供了宝贵的见解。这有助于研究人员为机器人应用做出明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Field Robotics
Journal of Field Robotics 工程技术-机器人学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Field Robotics seeks to promote scholarly publications dealing with the fundamentals of robotics in unstructured and dynamic environments. The Journal focuses on experimental robotics and encourages publication of work that has both theoretical and practical significance.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover Image, Volume 42, Number 1, January 2025 Back Cover, Volume 42, Number 1, January 2025 Issue Information Cover Image, Volume 41, Number 8, December 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1