Nudging Techniques: Design, Theoretical Grounds, and Ethical View

IF 4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of the Knowledge Economy Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s13132-024-02219-x
Rabab Ali Abumalloh, Osama Halabi, Raian Ali, Dena Al-Thani
{"title":"Nudging Techniques: Design, Theoretical Grounds, and Ethical View","authors":"Rabab Ali Abumalloh, Osama Halabi, Raian Ali, Dena Al-Thani","doi":"10.1007/s13132-024-02219-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nudges are approaches that direct individuals to perform particular courses of action to meet a pre-determined goal, without coercion. Previous literature has explored the design of nudge and its impact on users’ behavior in several domains and contexts. Still, scarce and fragmented knowledge about the design approaches, ethical considerations, and theoretical grounds have been presented by previous literature. Hence, this study aims to investigate the literature through bibliometric analysis and a narrative review of the nudging techniques and their impact on social behavior with an emphasis on the application domains, nudge designs, ethical considerations, and theoretical grounds. Focusing on nudge design and impact, we scan the landscape of the research in the area through bibliometric analysis and narrative review approaches. We searched for papers that included keywords related to nudges from the Scopus database and analyzed them using a bibliometric-based approach. Several diagrams that visualize the terms of the studies, sources, citations, and thematic trends were presented. The research provides several insights for researchers in terms of the design of the nudge, the theoretical grounds, ethical considerations, and the application domains of nudging.\n</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02219-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nudges are approaches that direct individuals to perform particular courses of action to meet a pre-determined goal, without coercion. Previous literature has explored the design of nudge and its impact on users’ behavior in several domains and contexts. Still, scarce and fragmented knowledge about the design approaches, ethical considerations, and theoretical grounds have been presented by previous literature. Hence, this study aims to investigate the literature through bibliometric analysis and a narrative review of the nudging techniques and their impact on social behavior with an emphasis on the application domains, nudge designs, ethical considerations, and theoretical grounds. Focusing on nudge design and impact, we scan the landscape of the research in the area through bibliometric analysis and narrative review approaches. We searched for papers that included keywords related to nudges from the Scopus database and analyzed them using a bibliometric-based approach. Several diagrams that visualize the terms of the studies, sources, citations, and thematic trends were presented. The research provides several insights for researchers in terms of the design of the nudge, the theoretical grounds, ethical considerations, and the application domains of nudging.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导技术:设计、理论基础和伦理观
暗示是一种在不强迫的情况下引导个人采取特定行动以实现预定目标的方法。以往的文献探讨了推力的设计及其在多个领域和情境中对用户行为的影响。然而,以往文献中关于设计方法、伦理考虑和理论依据的知识仍然匮乏且零散。因此,本研究旨在通过文献计量分析和叙述性综述,对推理技术及其对社会行为的影响进行研究,重点关注应用领域、推理设计、伦理考虑和理论依据。我们通过文献计量分析和叙事性综述的方法,以推导设计和影响为重点,对该领域的研究概况进行了扫描。我们从 Scopus 数据库中搜索了包含与 "代理 "相关关键词的论文,并采用基于文献计量学的方法对其进行了分析。我们绘制了几幅图表,直观地显示了研究术语、来源、引文和主题趋势。这项研究为研究人员提供了有关 "劝告 "设计、理论依据、伦理考虑和 "劝告 "应用领域的若干见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.
期刊最新文献
An Engagement Between Faculty Adeptness, Learner’s Expectations, Usage of Technology, and Perceived Learner’s Learning Outcome: Mediating Role of Emotional Intelligence Impact of Mobile Money on Resilience to Health Shocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Togo The Fishing and Aquaculture Production of Latin America with Respect to the Trade Balance and Foreign Investment Effects of ICTs on Labor Productivity: A Re-examination of Solow’s Paradox Through the Prism of the Joint Use of ICT Tools in Cameroonian Firms Career Imprints from Diverse Institutional Settings: a Comparative Study of Academic and Non-academic Partnered Ventures in Technopolis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1