Vertebrate scavenging in Australia is shaped by a complex interplay of bioregional, seasonal and habitat factors

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY Journal of Zoology Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1111/jzo.13200
E. E. Spencer, C. R. Dickman, A. Greenville, P. Barton, E. G. Ritchie, T. M. Newsome
{"title":"Vertebrate scavenging in Australia is shaped by a complex interplay of bioregional, seasonal and habitat factors","authors":"E. E. Spencer, C. R. Dickman, A. Greenville, P. Barton, E. G. Ritchie, T. M. Newsome","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carcass scavenging by vertebrates is a critical ecosystem service that is influenced by environmental factors such as season and habitat. However, there is limited understanding of the role that these factors play in shaping scavenging patterns across different bioregions. We used camera traps to monitor vertebrate scavengers at 120 kangaroo (Family: Macropodidae) carcasses that were positioned across different seasons (warm/cool) and habitats (open/closed canopy) in three disparate desert, subalpine and temperate bioregions in Australia. Our survey identified 27 species that scavenged carcasses and revealed clear differences in scavenging patterns across the three bioregions. Carcass use was highest for feral cats, birds of prey, corvids and red foxes in the desert bioregion; for reptiles and dingoes in the temperate bioregion and for feral pigs, possums and dingoes in the subalpine bioregion. Bioregional differences in scavenger guild composition explained >4.6 times more variation in scavenger guild dissimilarity than season and >9.8 times more variation than habitat. Further, habitat had few effects on scavenger communities or carcass detection and use, whereas season was a strong predictor of these responses. Across bioregions, there were some general seasonal and habitat scavenging trends, with mammals and birds often using carcasses more frequently in cooler seasons and birds detecting carcasses faster in open habitat. However, there was also extensive within‐bioregion seasonal variation. For example, depending on bioregion, some animals scavenged more frequently or detected carcasses faster in warmer seasons (i.e. birds and reptiles). Our results show that vertebrate scavenging is mediated by a complex interplay of environmental variables, especially seasonality, which may operate differently across bioregions. These findings have implications for understanding variability in vertebrate scavenging patterns and, in turn, functionally redundant or complementary scavenging processes.","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.13200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carcass scavenging by vertebrates is a critical ecosystem service that is influenced by environmental factors such as season and habitat. However, there is limited understanding of the role that these factors play in shaping scavenging patterns across different bioregions. We used camera traps to monitor vertebrate scavengers at 120 kangaroo (Family: Macropodidae) carcasses that were positioned across different seasons (warm/cool) and habitats (open/closed canopy) in three disparate desert, subalpine and temperate bioregions in Australia. Our survey identified 27 species that scavenged carcasses and revealed clear differences in scavenging patterns across the three bioregions. Carcass use was highest for feral cats, birds of prey, corvids and red foxes in the desert bioregion; for reptiles and dingoes in the temperate bioregion and for feral pigs, possums and dingoes in the subalpine bioregion. Bioregional differences in scavenger guild composition explained >4.6 times more variation in scavenger guild dissimilarity than season and >9.8 times more variation than habitat. Further, habitat had few effects on scavenger communities or carcass detection and use, whereas season was a strong predictor of these responses. Across bioregions, there were some general seasonal and habitat scavenging trends, with mammals and birds often using carcasses more frequently in cooler seasons and birds detecting carcasses faster in open habitat. However, there was also extensive within‐bioregion seasonal variation. For example, depending on bioregion, some animals scavenged more frequently or detected carcasses faster in warmer seasons (i.e. birds and reptiles). Our results show that vertebrate scavenging is mediated by a complex interplay of environmental variables, especially seasonality, which may operate differently across bioregions. These findings have implications for understanding variability in vertebrate scavenging patterns and, in turn, functionally redundant or complementary scavenging processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚的脊椎动物食腐现象是由生物区域、季节和栖息地因素的复杂相互作用形成的
脊椎动物的尸体清扫是一种重要的生态系统服务,受季节和栖息地等环境因素的影响。然而,人们对这些因素在不同生物区清扫模式中的作用了解有限。我们在澳大利亚三个不同的沙漠、亚高山和温带生物区,使用照相机陷阱监测了120只袋鼠(科:Macropodidae)尸体上的脊椎动物食腐动物,这些食腐动物分布在不同的季节(温暖/寒冷)和栖息地(开放/封闭树冠)。我们的调查确定了 27 种食腐物种,发现这三个生物区的食腐模式存在明显差异。在沙漠生物区,野猫、捕食鸟类、鸦科动物和红狐的尸体利用率最高;在温带生物区,爬行动物和野狗的尸体利用率最高;在亚高山生物区,野猪、负鼠和野狗的尸体利用率最高。食腐动物群落组成的生物区域差异对食腐动物群落差异的解释是季节差异的4.6倍,是栖息地差异的9.8倍。此外,栖息地对食腐动物群落或尸体的发现和利用几乎没有影响,而季节则是这些反应的有力预测因素。在不同的生物区域,清道夫的使用有一些普遍的季节和栖息地趋势,哺乳动物和鸟类通常在凉爽的季节更频繁地使用尸体,鸟类在开阔的栖息地发现尸体的速度更快。然而,生物区内也存在广泛的季节性差异。例如,根据生物区系的不同,一些动物(如鸟类和爬行动物)在温暖的季节更频繁地清理尸体或更快地发现尸体。我们的研究结果表明,脊椎动物的食腐行为受到环境变量(尤其是季节性)的复杂影响,而这些环境变量在不同的生物区可能会有不同的作用方式。这些发现对理解脊椎动物食腐模式的变化以及功能冗余或互补的食腐过程具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Reproductive health from hair: Validation and utility of hair progesterone analysis in the Asian black bear, Ursus thibetanus Multimodal courtship communication in a wolf spider Exploring resource patch occupancy: patch size, but not connectivity, explains the abundance of spider kleptoparasites in golden orb webs Lodge‐building in rodents: relationships with ecological and natural history factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1