Heterosis across an environmental and genetic space

Gabrielle D Sandstedt, Catherine A Rushworth
{"title":"Heterosis across an environmental and genetic space","authors":"Gabrielle D Sandstedt, Catherine A Rushworth","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.06.611759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When genetically divergent lineages meet again in secondary contact, hybrids may suffer negative, fitness-reducing consequences, or benefit from positive genetic interactions that result in increased fitness. Empirical studies of heterosis, a phenomenon in which hybrids outperform their inbred progenitors, are of great interest in agriculture, but are less often performed in wild systems. In this study, we leverage Boechera retrofracta, a primarily self-fertilizing wildflower species, to explore how population divergence influences fitness effects upon secondary contact. We integrated genomic data and a large-scale fitness experiment to compare fitness and heterozygosity between outbred and inbred progeny of B. retrofracta. We show that interpopulation hybrids have increased overwintering survival compared to inbred individuals, indicative of heterosis. The magnitude of heterosis varied across genotypes and different environments, with overwintering survival increasing with genetic distance between parents. Sliding window analyses of genotyping by sequencing data show that heterozygosity varies across the genome of two species, B. retrofracta and the commonly co-occurring species Boechera stricta. We next compared these data with de novo F2s (intrapopulation, interpopulation, and interspecific crosses), as well as with wild-collected interpopulation cross B. retrofracta and interspecific B. stricta x B. retrofracta hybrids. Wild-collected interspecific hybrids appear to be F1s, while wild-collected intraspecific B. retrofracta are consistent with more complex crossing patterns. Because outcrossing is associated with a transition to asexuality in this group, this suggests different mechanisms underlie asexuality in hybrid and non-hybrid lineages. These findings underscore the potential differences in the role of heterosis between genetic groups at different stages of divergence and its relevance following hybridization in nature.","PeriodicalId":501246,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.06.611759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When genetically divergent lineages meet again in secondary contact, hybrids may suffer negative, fitness-reducing consequences, or benefit from positive genetic interactions that result in increased fitness. Empirical studies of heterosis, a phenomenon in which hybrids outperform their inbred progenitors, are of great interest in agriculture, but are less often performed in wild systems. In this study, we leverage Boechera retrofracta, a primarily self-fertilizing wildflower species, to explore how population divergence influences fitness effects upon secondary contact. We integrated genomic data and a large-scale fitness experiment to compare fitness and heterozygosity between outbred and inbred progeny of B. retrofracta. We show that interpopulation hybrids have increased overwintering survival compared to inbred individuals, indicative of heterosis. The magnitude of heterosis varied across genotypes and different environments, with overwintering survival increasing with genetic distance between parents. Sliding window analyses of genotyping by sequencing data show that heterozygosity varies across the genome of two species, B. retrofracta and the commonly co-occurring species Boechera stricta. We next compared these data with de novo F2s (intrapopulation, interpopulation, and interspecific crosses), as well as with wild-collected interpopulation cross B. retrofracta and interspecific B. stricta x B. retrofracta hybrids. Wild-collected interspecific hybrids appear to be F1s, while wild-collected intraspecific B. retrofracta are consistent with more complex crossing patterns. Because outcrossing is associated with a transition to asexuality in this group, this suggests different mechanisms underlie asexuality in hybrid and non-hybrid lineages. These findings underscore the potential differences in the role of heterosis between genetic groups at different stages of divergence and its relevance following hybridization in nature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨越环境和遗传空间的异质性
当基因不同的品系在二次接触中再次相遇时,杂交种可能会产生负面影响,降低适应性,也可能从积极的基因相互作用中获益,从而提高适应性。杂交是指杂交种优于其近交祖先的一种现象,对杂交的实证研究在农业领域引起了极大的兴趣,但在野生系统中却较少进行。在本研究中,我们利用一种主要为自花授粉的野花物种 Boechera retrofracta,探索种群分化如何影响二次接触后的适合度效应。我们整合了基因组数据和大规模的适应性实验,比较了B. retrofracta外交后代和近交后代的适应性和杂合度。我们发现,与近交个体相比,种群间杂交种的越冬存活率更高,这表明存在异质性。不同基因型和不同环境下的异质性程度不同,越冬存活率随亲本间遗传距离的增加而增加。对基因分型测序数据的滑动窗口分析表明,杂合度在两个物种(B. retrofracta 和常见的共生物种 Boechera stricta)的基因组中各不相同。接下来,我们将这些数据与新的 F2(种群内、种群间和种间杂交)以及野生采集的种群间杂交 B. retrofracta 和种间 B. stricta x B. retrofracta 杂交种进行了比较。野生采集的种间杂交种似乎是 F1s,而野生采集的种内 B. retrofracta 与更复杂的杂交模式一致。由于杂交与该群体向无性繁殖的过渡有关,这表明杂交和非杂交品系的无性繁殖具有不同的机制。这些发现强调了处于不同分化阶段的遗传群体之间异交作用的潜在差异及其在自然界杂交后的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multiplexed spatial mapping of chromatin features, transcriptome, and proteins in tissues Mitochondrial superoxide acts in the intestine to extend longevity AyurPhenoClusters define common molecular roots for rare diseases and uncover ciliary dysfunctions in syndromic conditions Screening and identification of gene expression in large cohorts of clinical lung cancer samples unveils the major involvement of EZH2 and SOX2 LncRNA TAAL is a Modulator of Tie1-Mediated Vascular Function in Diabetic Retinopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1