Vegetarians’ and vegans’ experiences with and attitudes towards ultra-processed foods (UPF): a qualitative study

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS BMC Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1186/s40795-024-00925-y
Johanne Haneberg, Marianne Molin, Marte Gjeitung Byfuglien, Lisa Garnweidner-Holme
{"title":"Vegetarians’ and vegans’ experiences with and attitudes towards ultra-processed foods (UPF): a qualitative study","authors":"Johanne Haneberg, Marianne Molin, Marte Gjeitung Byfuglien, Lisa Garnweidner-Holme","doi":"10.1186/s40795-024-00925-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) is increasing in many countries. Simultaneously, there is a growing number of consumers that follow a vegetarian or vegan diet, many due to its possible positive impact on sustainability and food waste. However, little is known about attitudes towards and experiences with UPF among vegetarians and vegans. Thus, this study investigates vegetarians’ and vegans’ experiences with and attitudes towards UPFs. We conducted semi-structured, individual interviews with 14 participants between September and December 2021. The participants were from different areas in Norway. The data were analysed using a thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke. In general, participants appeared to have diverse knowledge of and divergent attitudes towards UPFs. However, participants mainly associated substitute products (e.g. meat substitutes, dairy substitutes) as UPFs. They appreciated the increased availability of vegetarian and vegan UPF which made it easier for them to follow a plant-based diet. They enjoyed the taste and consistency of vegetarian and vegan UPF. However, participants expressed concerns about the effects that industrial processing has on the products’ nutritional content. This study indicated that there was a diverse knowledge of and various attitudes towards UPFs among the participating vegetarians and vegans. Public information and guidelines about using UPF (e.g. meat substitutes, dairy substitutes) in vegetarian and vegan diets are needed, as well as information about their possible impact on health and sustainability.","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00925-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) is increasing in many countries. Simultaneously, there is a growing number of consumers that follow a vegetarian or vegan diet, many due to its possible positive impact on sustainability and food waste. However, little is known about attitudes towards and experiences with UPF among vegetarians and vegans. Thus, this study investigates vegetarians’ and vegans’ experiences with and attitudes towards UPFs. We conducted semi-structured, individual interviews with 14 participants between September and December 2021. The participants were from different areas in Norway. The data were analysed using a thematic analysis by Braun and Clarke. In general, participants appeared to have diverse knowledge of and divergent attitudes towards UPFs. However, participants mainly associated substitute products (e.g. meat substitutes, dairy substitutes) as UPFs. They appreciated the increased availability of vegetarian and vegan UPF which made it easier for them to follow a plant-based diet. They enjoyed the taste and consistency of vegetarian and vegan UPF. However, participants expressed concerns about the effects that industrial processing has on the products’ nutritional content. This study indicated that there was a diverse knowledge of and various attitudes towards UPFs among the participating vegetarians and vegans. Public information and guidelines about using UPF (e.g. meat substitutes, dairy substitutes) in vegetarian and vegan diets are needed, as well as information about their possible impact on health and sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
素食者和纯素者对超加工食品(UPF)的体验和态度:一项定性研究
在许多国家,超加工食品(UPF)的消费量正在增加。与此同时,越来越多的消费者选择素食或纯素饮食,其中许多人是因为素食或纯素饮食可能会对可持续发展和食物浪费产生积极影响。然而,人们对素食者和纯素食者对 UPF 的态度和体验知之甚少。因此,本研究调查了素食者和纯素食者对 UPF 的体验和态度。我们在2021年9月至12月期间对14名参与者进行了半结构化个人访谈。参与者来自挪威不同地区。我们采用布劳恩和克拉克的主题分析法对数据进行了分析。总体而言,参与者似乎对 UPFs 有着不同的认识和不同的态度。不过,参与者主要将替代产品(如肉类替代品、乳制品替代品)与 UPF 联系在一起。他们赞赏素食和纯素UPF的供应增加,使他们更容易遵循以植物为本的饮食习惯。他们喜欢素食和纯素 UPF 的味道和一致性。不过,参与者对工业加工对产品营养成分的影响表示担忧。这项研究表明,参与研究的素食者和纯素者对 UPF 有不同的认识和态度。在素食和纯素饮食中使用 UPF(如肉类替代品、乳制品替代品)需要公共信息和指南,以及有关其对健康和可持续性可能产生的影响的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between maternal dietary diversity during pregnancy and birth outcomes: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Improving dietary diversity and food security among low-income families during financial crisis using cash transfers and mHealth: experience from two selected districts in Sri Lanka. Impact of baseline dietary quality on the efficacy of a dietitian-guided weight reduction program. Association between dietary intake of iron and heart failure among American adults: data from NHANES 2009-2018. Health outcomes reported by healthcare providers and clients of a community-based medically tailored meal program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1