Outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with obinutuzumab compared with patients with rituximab: a retrospective cohort study

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY Virology Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1186/s12985-024-02484-x
Wenxiu Shu, Qianqian Yang, Jing Le, Qianqian Cai, Hui Dai, Liufei Luo, Jiaqi Tong, Yanping Song, Bingrong Chen, Dengbing Chen, Dian Jin
{"title":"Outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with obinutuzumab compared with patients with rituximab: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Wenxiu Shu, Qianqian Yang, Jing Le, Qianqian Cai, Hui Dai, Liufei Luo, Jiaqi Tong, Yanping Song, Bingrong Chen, Dengbing Chen, Dian Jin","doi":"10.1186/s12985-024-02484-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies could have a higher risk of adverse outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab has shown greater B-cell depletion and superior in vitro efficacy than rituximab. We aimed to assess whether obinutuzumab would result in worse COVID-19 outcomes than rituximab. We retrospectively reviewed 124 patients with B-cell lymphoma, 106 of whom received rituximab treatment and 18 of whom received obinutuzumab treatment. The adverse outcomes of COVID-19 were compared between patients in the two cohorts. The proportions of patients who were hospitalized (55.6% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.005), experienced prolonged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (38.9% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001), and developed severe COVID-19 (33.3% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with obinutuzumab than in those with rituximab. Multivariate analyses showed that obinuzumab treatment was associated with higher incidences of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 27.05, 95% CI 3.75-195.22, p = 0.001) and severe COVID-19(OR 15.07, 95% CI 2.58–91.72, p = 0.003). Our study suggested that patients treated with obinutuzumab had a higher risk of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 than those treated with rituximab.","PeriodicalId":23616,"journal":{"name":"Virology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02484-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies could have a higher risk of adverse outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody obinutuzumab has shown greater B-cell depletion and superior in vitro efficacy than rituximab. We aimed to assess whether obinutuzumab would result in worse COVID-19 outcomes than rituximab. We retrospectively reviewed 124 patients with B-cell lymphoma, 106 of whom received rituximab treatment and 18 of whom received obinutuzumab treatment. The adverse outcomes of COVID-19 were compared between patients in the two cohorts. The proportions of patients who were hospitalized (55.6% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.005), experienced prolonged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (38.9% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001), and developed severe COVID-19 (33.3% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001) were higher in patients with obinutuzumab than in those with rituximab. Multivariate analyses showed that obinuzumab treatment was associated with higher incidences of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 27.05, 95% CI 3.75-195.22, p = 0.001) and severe COVID-19(OR 15.07, 95% CI 2.58–91.72, p = 0.003). Our study suggested that patients treated with obinutuzumab had a higher risk of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 than those treated with rituximab.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与利妥昔单抗患者相比,奥比妥珠单抗患者的COVID-19疗效:一项回顾性队列研究
接受抗CD20单克隆抗体治疗的患者可能有更高的冠状病毒病不良后果风险 2019 (COVID-19)。新型抗CD20单克隆抗体obinutuzumab显示出比利妥昔单抗更强的B细胞耗竭能力和更优越的体外疗效。我们的目的是评估奥比奴珠单抗是否会导致 COVID-19 结果比利妥昔单抗更差。我们对124名B细胞淋巴瘤患者进行了回顾性研究,其中106人接受了利妥昔单抗治疗,18人接受了奥比妥珠单抗治疗。我们对两组患者的 COVID-19 不良反应进行了比较。接受奥比妥珠单抗治疗的患者住院比例(55.6% vs. 20.8%,p = 0.005)、经历长时间严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的比例(38.9% vs. 2.9%,p < 0.001)和出现严重COVID-19的比例(33.3% vs. 4.7%,p < 0.001)均高于接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者。多变量分析显示,奥比奴珠单抗治疗与 SARS-CoV-2 感染时间延长(OR 27.05,95% CI 3.75-195.22,p = 0.001)和严重 COVID-19 (OR 15.07,95% CI 2.58-91.72,p = 0.003)的发生率较高有关。我们的研究表明,与使用利妥昔单抗治疗的患者相比,使用奥比妥珠单抗治疗的患者发生 SARS-CoV-2 延长感染和严重 COVID-19 的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Virology Journal
Virology Journal 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
186
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Virology Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of virology, including research on the viruses of animals, plants and microbes. The journal welcomes basic research as well as pre-clinical and clinical studies of novel diagnostic tools, vaccines and anti-viral therapies. The Editorial policy of Virology Journal is to publish all research which is assessed by peer reviewers to be a coherent and sound addition to the scientific literature, and puts less emphasis on interest levels or perceived impact.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of adenovirus, rotavirus A, and coinfection in children during 2014-2023 in Guangzhou, China. Complete genome characterization by nanopore sequencing of rotaviruses A, B, and C circulating on large-scale pig farms in Russia. Evaluation of the MAGLUMI HIV Ab/Ag combi test for the detection of HIV infection. Genomic epidemiology of early SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in Bangladesh. HBeAg-positive CHB patients with indeterminate phase associated with a high risk of significant fibrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1