Enhancing Thyroid Nodule Assessment: Leveraging Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography as a Screening Modality - A Meta-Analysis

Dev Desai, Maria Eleni Malafi, Hetvi Shah, Aneri Parikh, Abhijay B Shah, Vismit Gami, Parth Gupta
{"title":"Enhancing Thyroid Nodule Assessment: Leveraging Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography as a Screening Modality - A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Dev Desai, Maria Eleni Malafi, Hetvi Shah, Aneri Parikh, Abhijay B Shah, Vismit Gami, Parth Gupta","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.11.24304174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: - CEUS has become an emerging radio diagnostic technique of modern times. The use of these contrasts offers a way better alternative than materials that cause radiation. Thyroid nodules are notorious for their effect on normal physiology and the routine best diagnostic modality apart from biopsy is Radioactive Iodine. Aim:- To conduct a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis to understand the role of CEUS in diagnosing thyroid nodules. Methodology:- According to Prisma guidelines, literature on the topic was found using the Keywords CEUS, Thyroid Nodule, and Radioactive Iodine. Two independent reviewers conducted a quality check on the papers and decided on the studies that should be included. Any discrepancies were solved by a third reviewer. Meta Disc, Review Manager, and Excel were used to analyze the extracted data from the selected studies as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Biopsy was taken as a Reference Gold Standard. Result:- A total of 47 RCTs with 5,527 patients were selected for the study. The pooled sensitivity of CEUS is 0.87, with a CI of 95% in a range of 0.86 to 0.88. The specificity of CEUS is 0.84, with a CI of 95% in a range of 0.82 to 0.85. The summary of the ROC curve shows that the area under the curve for CEUS was 0.9292 and the overall diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 40.59. Conclusion:- It can be concluded from the results that CEUS can be used as a Screening tool for high suspicion groups but it is still not a perfect test. The newer generation of Contrasts may yield higher accuracy but for the currently available contrasts, Biopsy remains the best tool for a definitive and accurate diagnosis. Keywords:- Thyroid Nodule, Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Benign, Malignant, Prognosis","PeriodicalId":501358,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.11.24304174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: - CEUS has become an emerging radio diagnostic technique of modern times. The use of these contrasts offers a way better alternative than materials that cause radiation. Thyroid nodules are notorious for their effect on normal physiology and the routine best diagnostic modality apart from biopsy is Radioactive Iodine. Aim:- To conduct a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis to understand the role of CEUS in diagnosing thyroid nodules. Methodology:- According to Prisma guidelines, literature on the topic was found using the Keywords CEUS, Thyroid Nodule, and Radioactive Iodine. Two independent reviewers conducted a quality check on the papers and decided on the studies that should be included. Any discrepancies were solved by a third reviewer. Meta Disc, Review Manager, and Excel were used to analyze the extracted data from the selected studies as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Biopsy was taken as a Reference Gold Standard. Result:- A total of 47 RCTs with 5,527 patients were selected for the study. The pooled sensitivity of CEUS is 0.87, with a CI of 95% in a range of 0.86 to 0.88. The specificity of CEUS is 0.84, with a CI of 95% in a range of 0.82 to 0.85. The summary of the ROC curve shows that the area under the curve for CEUS was 0.9292 and the overall diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 40.59. Conclusion:- It can be concluded from the results that CEUS can be used as a Screening tool for high suspicion groups but it is still not a perfect test. The newer generation of Contrasts may yield higher accuracy but for the currently available contrasts, Biopsy remains the best tool for a definitive and accurate diagnosis. Keywords:- Thyroid Nodule, Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Benign, Malignant, Prognosis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强甲状腺结节评估:将对比增强超声波造影作为一种筛查模式 - 一项 Meta 分析
导言:- CEUS 已成为现代新兴的放射诊断技术。这些对比剂的使用提供了一种比造成辐射的材料更好的替代方法。甲状腺结节因其对正常生理的影响而臭名昭著,除活检外,常规的最佳诊断方式是放射性碘。目的:- 进行诊断测试准确性荟萃分析,以了解 CEUS 在诊断甲状腺结节中的作用。方法:- 根据Prisma指南,使用关键词CEUS、甲状腺结节和放射性碘查找相关文献。两名独立审稿人对论文进行了质量检查,并决定应纳入哪些研究。任何差异均由第三位审稿人解决。根据纳入和排除标准,使用 Meta Disc、Review Manager 和 Excel 分析从所选研究中提取的数据。活组织检查作为参考金标准。结果:- 本研究共选取了 47 项 RCT,5527 名患者。CEUS的综合灵敏度为0.87,CI为95%,范围在0.86至0.88之间。CEUS 的特异性为 0.84,95% 的 CI 为 0.82 至 0.85。ROC 曲线总结显示,CEUS 的曲线下面积为 0.9292,总体诊断几率(DOR)为 40.59。结论:- 从结果中可以得出结论,CEUS 可用作高危人群的筛查工具,但它仍不是一种完美的检测工具。新一代的对比剂可能会产生更高的准确性,但就目前可用的对比剂而言,活组织检查仍是明确和准确诊断的最佳工具。关键词:- 甲状腺结节 对比增强超声 良性 恶性 预后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Auto-segmentation of hemi-diaphragms in free-breathing dynamic MRI of pediatric subjects with thoracic insufficiency syndrome Dynamic MR of muscle contraction during electrical muscle stimulation as a potential diagnostic tool for neuromuscular disease Deriving Imaging Biomarkers for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Using Deep Learning Exploring subthreshold functional network alterations in women with phenylketonuria by higher criticism Beyond Algorithms: The Impact of Simplified CNN Models and Multifactorial Influences on Radiological Image Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1