Simultaneous onboard analysis of seawater dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration and stable isotope ratio (δ13C‐DIC)

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 LIMNOLOGY Limnology and Oceanography: Methods Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1002/lom3.10642
Zhentao Sun, Xinyu Li, Zhangxian Ouyang, Charles Featherstone, Eliot A. Atekwana, Najid Hussain, Wei‐Jun Cai
{"title":"Simultaneous onboard analysis of seawater dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration and stable isotope ratio (δ13C‐DIC)","authors":"Zhentao Sun, Xinyu Li, Zhangxian Ouyang, Charles Featherstone, Eliot A. Atekwana, Najid Hussain, Wei‐Jun Cai","doi":"10.1002/lom3.10642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and its stable carbon isotope (<jats:italic>δ</jats:italic><jats:sup>13</jats:sup>C‐DIC) are valuable parameters for studying the aquatic carbon cycle and quantifying ocean anthropogenic carbon accumulation rates. However, the potential of this coupled pair is underexploited as only 15% or less of cruise samples have been analyzed for <jats:italic>δ</jats:italic><jats:sup>13</jats:sup>C‐DIC because the traditional isotope analysis is labor‐intensive and restricted to onshore laboratories. Here, we improved the analytical precision and reported the protocol of an automated, efficient, and high‐precision method for ship‐based DIC and <jats:italic>δ</jats:italic><jats:sup>13</jats:sup>C‐DIC analysis based on cavity ring‐down spectroscopy (CRDS). We also introduced a set of stable in‐house standards to ensure accurate and consistent DIC and <jats:italic>δ</jats:italic><jats:sup>13</jats:sup>C‐DIC measurements, especially on prolonged cruises. With this method, we analyzed over 1600 discrete seawater samples over a 40‐d cruise along the North American eastern ocean margin in summer 2022, representing the first effort to collect a large dataset of <jats:italic>δ</jats:italic><jats:sup>13</jats:sup>C‐DIC onboard of any oceanographic expedition. We evaluated the method's uncertainty, which was 1.2 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>mol kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> for the DIC concentration and 0.03‰ for the <jats:italic>δ</jats:italic><jats:sup>13</jats:sup>C‐DIC value (1<jats:italic>σ</jats:italic>). An interlaboratory comparison of onboard DIC concentration analysis revealed an average offset of 2.0 ± 3.8 <jats:italic>μ</jats:italic>mol kg<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> between CRDS and the coulometry‐based results. The cross‐validation of <jats:italic>δ</jats:italic><jats:sup>13</jats:sup>C‐DIC in the deep‐ocean data exhibited a mean difference of only −0.03‰ ± 0.07‰, emphasizing the consistency with historical data. Potential applications in aquatic biogeochemistry are discussed.","PeriodicalId":18145,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Methods","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and its stable carbon isotope (δ13C‐DIC) are valuable parameters for studying the aquatic carbon cycle and quantifying ocean anthropogenic carbon accumulation rates. However, the potential of this coupled pair is underexploited as only 15% or less of cruise samples have been analyzed for δ13C‐DIC because the traditional isotope analysis is labor‐intensive and restricted to onshore laboratories. Here, we improved the analytical precision and reported the protocol of an automated, efficient, and high‐precision method for ship‐based DIC and δ13C‐DIC analysis based on cavity ring‐down spectroscopy (CRDS). We also introduced a set of stable in‐house standards to ensure accurate and consistent DIC and δ13C‐DIC measurements, especially on prolonged cruises. With this method, we analyzed over 1600 discrete seawater samples over a 40‐d cruise along the North American eastern ocean margin in summer 2022, representing the first effort to collect a large dataset of δ13C‐DIC onboard of any oceanographic expedition. We evaluated the method's uncertainty, which was 1.2 μmol kg−1 for the DIC concentration and 0.03‰ for the δ13C‐DIC value (1σ). An interlaboratory comparison of onboard DIC concentration analysis revealed an average offset of 2.0 ± 3.8 μmol kg−1 between CRDS and the coulometry‐based results. The cross‐validation of δ13C‐DIC in the deep‐ocean data exhibited a mean difference of only −0.03‰ ± 0.07‰, emphasizing the consistency with historical data. Potential applications in aquatic biogeochemistry are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时进行海水溶解无机碳(DIC)浓度和稳定同位素比值(δ13C-DIC)的船上分析
溶解无机碳(DIC)及其稳定碳同位素(δ13C-DIC)是研究水生碳循环和量化海洋人为碳累积率的宝贵参数。然而,由于传统的同位素分析耗费大量人力物力,且仅限于陆上实验室,因此仅有 15%或更少的巡航样本进行过 δ13C-DIC 分析,这对耦合参数的潜力尚未得到充分利用。在此,我们提高了分析精度,并报告了一种基于空腔环降光谱(CRDS)的自动化、高效和高精度的船载 DIC 和 δ13C-DIC 分析方法。我们还引入了一套稳定的内部标准,以确保 DIC 和 δ13C-DIC 测量的准确性和一致性,尤其是在长期巡航中。利用这种方法,我们在 2022 年夏季沿北美东大洋边缘进行了为期 40 天的巡航,分析了 1600 多个离散海水样本,这是首次在任何海洋考察船上收集δ13C-DIC 的大型数据集。我们评估了该方法的不确定性,DIC 浓度为 1.2 μmol kg-1,δ13C-DIC 值为 0.03‰(1σ)。机载 DIC 浓度分析的实验室间比较显示,CRDS 和基于库仑计的结果之间的平均偏差为 2.0 ± 3.8 μmol kg-1。深海数据中δ13C-DIC 的交叉验证显示平均差异仅为 -0.03‰ ± 0.07‰,强调了与历史数据的一致性。讨论了在水生生物地球化学中的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Limnology and Oceanography: Methods (ISSN 1541-5856) is a companion to ASLO''s top-rated journal Limnology and Oceanography, and articles are held to the same high standards. In order to provide the most rapid publication consistent with high standards, Limnology and Oceanography: Methods appears in electronic format only, and the entire submission and review system is online. Articles are posted as soon as they are accepted and formatted for publication. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods will consider manuscripts whose primary focus is methodological, and that deal with problems in the aquatic sciences. Manuscripts may present new measurement equipment, techniques for analyzing observations or samples, methods for understanding and interpreting information, analyses of metadata to examine the effectiveness of approaches, invited and contributed reviews and syntheses, and techniques for communicating and teaching in the aquatic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Correction to “Estimating ethanol correction factors for δ13C and δ15N isotopic signatures of freshwater zooplankton from multiple lakes” Multivariate statistical “unmixing” of Indian and Pacific Ocean sediment provenance Assessment of a pH optode for oceanographic moored and profiling applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1