Beyond Correlation: Incorporating Counterfactual Guidance to Better Support Exploratory Visual Analysis

Arran Zeyu Wang;David Borland;David Gotz
{"title":"Beyond Correlation: Incorporating Counterfactual Guidance to Better Support Exploratory Visual Analysis","authors":"Arran Zeyu Wang;David Borland;David Gotz","doi":"10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing effective guidance for users has long been an important and challenging task for efficient exploratory visual analytics, especially when selecting variables for visualization in high-dimensional datasets. Correlation is the most widely applied metric for guidance in statistical and analytical tools, however a reliance on correlation may lead users towards false positives when interpreting causal relations in the data. In this work, inspired by prior insights on the benefits of counterfactual visualization in supporting visual causal inference, we propose a novel, simple, and efficient counterfactual guidance method to enhance causal inference performance in guided exploratory analytics based on insights and concerns gathered from expert interviews. Our technique aims to capitalize on the benefits of counterfactual approaches while reducing their complexity for users. We integrated counterfactual guidance into an exploratory visual analytics system, and using a synthetically generated ground-truth causal dataset, conducted a comparative user study and evaluated to what extent counterfactual guidance can help lead users to more precise visual causal inferences. The results suggest that counterfactual guidance improved visual causal inference performance, and also led to different exploratory behaviors compared to correlation-based guidance. Based on these findings, we offer future directions and challenges for incorporating counterfactual guidance to better support exploratory visual analytics.","PeriodicalId":94035,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","volume":"31 1","pages":"776-786"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10670565/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Providing effective guidance for users has long been an important and challenging task for efficient exploratory visual analytics, especially when selecting variables for visualization in high-dimensional datasets. Correlation is the most widely applied metric for guidance in statistical and analytical tools, however a reliance on correlation may lead users towards false positives when interpreting causal relations in the data. In this work, inspired by prior insights on the benefits of counterfactual visualization in supporting visual causal inference, we propose a novel, simple, and efficient counterfactual guidance method to enhance causal inference performance in guided exploratory analytics based on insights and concerns gathered from expert interviews. Our technique aims to capitalize on the benefits of counterfactual approaches while reducing their complexity for users. We integrated counterfactual guidance into an exploratory visual analytics system, and using a synthetically generated ground-truth causal dataset, conducted a comparative user study and evaluated to what extent counterfactual guidance can help lead users to more precise visual causal inferences. The results suggest that counterfactual guidance improved visual causal inference performance, and also led to different exploratory behaviors compared to correlation-based guidance. Based on these findings, we offer future directions and challenges for incorporating counterfactual guidance to better support exploratory visual analytics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越相关性:纳入反事实指导,更好地支持探索性可视分析
长期以来,为用户提供有效的指导一直是高效探索性可视分析的一项重要而具有挑战性的任务,尤其是在高维数据集中选择可视化变量时。相关性是统计和分析工具中应用最广泛的指导指标,然而,在解释数据中的因果关系时,对相关性的依赖可能会导致用户误判。在这项工作中,受先前关于反事实可视化在支持可视化因果推理方面的优势的见解的启发,我们提出了一种新颖、简单、高效的反事实引导方法,以根据从专家访谈中收集到的见解和关注点,提高引导式探索分析中的因果推理性能。我们的技术旨在利用反事实方法的优势,同时降低其对用户的复杂性。我们将反事实引导集成到一个探索性可视分析系统中,并使用合成生成的地面实况因果数据集,开展了一项用户比较研究,评估了反事实引导在多大程度上能帮助用户进行更精确的可视化因果推断。结果表明,与基于相关性的引导相比,反事实引导提高了可视化因果推断性能,同时也导致了不同的探索行为。基于这些发现,我们提出了结合反事实引导以更好地支持探索性可视化分析的未来方向和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HYVE: Hybrid Vertex Encoder for Neural Distance Fields. Errata to "DiffCap: Diffusion-Based Real-Time Human Motion Capture Using Sparse IMUs and a Monocular Camera". GSwap: Realistic Head Swapping With Dynamic Neural Gaussian Field. PortInput: Enabling Always-available Micro-gesture Input with Pressure Array Sensor. FISN: FInding Spatial Neighborhoods for Generalizable Novel View Synthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1