Image memorability influences memory for where the item was seen but not when

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory & Cognition Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.3758/s13421-024-01635-3
Nathan Trinkl, Jeremy M. Wolfe
{"title":"Image memorability influences memory for where the item was seen but not when","authors":"Nathan Trinkl, Jeremy M. Wolfe","doi":"10.3758/s13421-024-01635-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Observers can determine whether they have previously seen hundreds of images with more than 80% accuracy. This “massive memory” for WHAT we have seen is accompanied by smaller but still massive memories for WHERE and WHEN the item was seen (spatial &amp; temporal massive memory). Recent studies have shown that certain images are more easily remembered than others (higher “memorability”). Does memorability influence spatial massive memory and temporal massive memory? In two experiments, viewers saw 150 images presented twice in random order. These 300 images were sequentially presented at random locations in a 7 × 7 grid. If an image was categorized as old, observers clicked on the spot in the grid where they thought they had previously seen it. They also noted when they had seen it: Experiment 1—clicking on a timeline; Experiment 2—estimating the trial number when the item first appeared. Replicating prior work, data show that high-memorability images are remembered better than low-memorability images. Interestingly, in both experiments, spatial memory precision was correlated with image memorability, while temporal memory precision did not vary as a function of memorability. Apparently, properties that make images memorable help us remember WHERE but not WHEN those images were presented. The lack of correlation between memorability and temporal memory is, of course, a negative result and should be treated with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-024-01635-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observers can determine whether they have previously seen hundreds of images with more than 80% accuracy. This “massive memory” for WHAT we have seen is accompanied by smaller but still massive memories for WHERE and WHEN the item was seen (spatial & temporal massive memory). Recent studies have shown that certain images are more easily remembered than others (higher “memorability”). Does memorability influence spatial massive memory and temporal massive memory? In two experiments, viewers saw 150 images presented twice in random order. These 300 images were sequentially presented at random locations in a 7 × 7 grid. If an image was categorized as old, observers clicked on the spot in the grid where they thought they had previously seen it. They also noted when they had seen it: Experiment 1—clicking on a timeline; Experiment 2—estimating the trial number when the item first appeared. Replicating prior work, data show that high-memorability images are remembered better than low-memorability images. Interestingly, in both experiments, spatial memory precision was correlated with image memorability, while temporal memory precision did not vary as a function of memorability. Apparently, properties that make images memorable help us remember WHERE but not WHEN those images were presented. The lack of correlation between memorability and temporal memory is, of course, a negative result and should be treated with caution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图像的可记忆性会影响对物品出现地点的记忆,但不会影响对物品出现时间的记忆
观察者能以 80% 以上的准确率判断出自己是否曾见过数百张图像。这种对我们所见过的事物的 "大量记忆",伴随着较小但仍然是大量的记忆,即在什么地方和什么时候看到了这个项目(空间和ampamp;时间大量记忆)。最近的研究表明,某些图像比其他图像更容易被记住("可记忆性 "更高)。可记忆性是否会影响空间大容量记忆和时间大容量记忆?在两项实验中,观众看到 150 幅图像以随机顺序呈现两次。这 300 幅图像在 7 × 7 网格中的随机位置依次呈现。如果某幅图像被归类为旧图像,观察者就会点击网格中他们认为曾见过该图像的位置。同时,他们也会记下看到该图像的时间:实验 1:点击时间轴;实验 2:估计项目首次出现的试验编号。与之前的研究相同,数据显示高记忆性图像比低记忆性图像记忆效果更好。有趣的是,在这两个实验中,空间记忆的精确度与图像的可记性相关,而时间记忆的精确度则不随可记性的变化而变化。显然,使图像易于记忆的特性能帮助我们记住图像出现的时间,但不能帮助我们记住图像出现的地点。当然,可记性与时间记忆之间缺乏相关性是一个负面结果,应谨慎对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
期刊最新文献
Metamemory judgments and design effects: Judgment of learning (JOL) reactivity in free recall is affected by study list structure. Conceptual masking disrupts change-detection performance. Where the 'bad' and the 'good' go: A multi-lab direct replication report of Casasanto (2009, Experiment 1). A color-digit Stroop task shows numerical influence on numerosity processing Drawing promotes memory retention in a patient with sleep-related anterograde amnesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1