Correlation between thoracoscopic presentations and pathological patterns in undiagnosed pleural effusion

Mohamed Elsaid Ali Hassan Elfeqy, Hanaa Sami Hamed, Dalia Anas Ibrahim
{"title":"Correlation between thoracoscopic presentations and pathological patterns in undiagnosed pleural effusion","authors":"Mohamed Elsaid Ali Hassan Elfeqy, Hanaa Sami Hamed, Dalia Anas Ibrahim","doi":"10.1186/s43168-024-00324-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pleural effusion is the most prevalent pleural disorder. One third of pleural effusions are caused by lung cancer. Thoracoscopy is regarded as the most reliable diagnostic method for the evaluation of suspected pleural malignancy. To assess visible pleural characteristics of abnormalities and their locations for malignant and benign pathologies as well as to determine the incidence of malignancy in the apparent normal pleura. This was a descriptive, observational, and cross-sectional research that was performed on 36 cases with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions prepared for medical thoracoscopy and on whom the cytological analysis was inconclusive, at the thoracoscopic Unit Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine Zagazig University, from December 2023 to May 2024. The apparent normal pleura and adhesions were significantly greater in benign effusions than in malignant effusions (p = 0.019 and p = 0.04, respectively), while nodular effusion was significantly greater in malignant effusions than in benign effusions (p = 0.003). Bleeding was significantly greater in malignant effusions than in benign effusions (p = 0.019). As regards the thoracoscopic findings, 24 (66.7%) patients showed nodular patterns, 14 (38.9%) patients showed adhesions, and two (5.6%) patients had pus, while six (16.7%) patients had apparent normal pleura. The costal pleura was the most frequently affected site (88.9%) followed by the visceral pleura (55.6%) then the diaphragmatic pleura (38.9%). Medical thoracoscopy (MT), a minimally invasive and a generally safe treatment, enables the interventional pulmonologist to access the pleural cavity directly and obtain pleural samples under direct view helping in predicting the pathology.\n","PeriodicalId":22426,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Bronchology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43168-024-00324-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pleural effusion is the most prevalent pleural disorder. One third of pleural effusions are caused by lung cancer. Thoracoscopy is regarded as the most reliable diagnostic method for the evaluation of suspected pleural malignancy. To assess visible pleural characteristics of abnormalities and their locations for malignant and benign pathologies as well as to determine the incidence of malignancy in the apparent normal pleura. This was a descriptive, observational, and cross-sectional research that was performed on 36 cases with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions prepared for medical thoracoscopy and on whom the cytological analysis was inconclusive, at the thoracoscopic Unit Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine Zagazig University, from December 2023 to May 2024. The apparent normal pleura and adhesions were significantly greater in benign effusions than in malignant effusions (p = 0.019 and p = 0.04, respectively), while nodular effusion was significantly greater in malignant effusions than in benign effusions (p = 0.003). Bleeding was significantly greater in malignant effusions than in benign effusions (p = 0.019). As regards the thoracoscopic findings, 24 (66.7%) patients showed nodular patterns, 14 (38.9%) patients showed adhesions, and two (5.6%) patients had pus, while six (16.7%) patients had apparent normal pleura. The costal pleura was the most frequently affected site (88.9%) followed by the visceral pleura (55.6%) then the diaphragmatic pleura (38.9%). Medical thoracoscopy (MT), a minimally invasive and a generally safe treatment, enables the interventional pulmonologist to access the pleural cavity directly and obtain pleural samples under direct view helping in predicting the pathology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未确诊胸腔积液的胸腔镜表现与病理模式之间的相关性
胸腔积液是最常见的胸膜疾病。三分之一的胸腔积液由肺癌引起。胸腔镜检查被认为是评估疑似胸膜恶性肿瘤最可靠的诊断方法。评估胸膜可见的异常特征及其恶性和良性病变的位置,并确定表面正常胸膜中恶性肿瘤的发生率。这是一项描述性、观察性和横断面研究,研究对象是 2023 年 12 月至 2024 年 5 月期间在扎加齐格大学医学院胸腔疾病系胸腔镜室就诊的 36 例未确诊的渗出性胸腔积液病例,这些病例准备接受内科胸腔镜检查,但细胞学分析未得出结论。良性渗出液中明显正常胸膜和粘连明显多于恶性渗出液(分别为 p = 0.019 和 p = 0.04),而恶性渗出液中结节性渗出明显多于良性渗出液(p = 0.003)。恶性积液的出血量明显高于良性积液(p = 0.019)。胸腔镜检查结果显示,24 例(66.7%)患者的胸膜呈结节状,14 例(38.9%)患者的胸膜呈粘连状,2 例(5.6%)患者的胸膜呈脓性,而 6 例(16.7%)患者的胸膜明显正常。最常受影响的部位是肋胸膜(88.9%),其次是内脏胸膜(55.6%)和膈胸膜(38.9%)。医用胸腔镜(MT)是一种微创且普遍安全的治疗方法,可使介入肺科医生直接进入胸膜腔,在直视下获取胸膜样本,有助于预测病理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severity, mortality, and incidence of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients Accuracy of convex probe EBUS-TBNA versus FDG-PET/CT imaging in diagnosis and mediastinal staging of lung cancer patients; an Egyptian Experience Role of pleural manometry and transthoracic ultrasonography to predict entrapped lung Comparing the outcome of using high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure The role of screening of patients proved to have gastroesophageal reflux disease by upper gastrointestinal endoscope for early detection of interstitial lung diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1