Jonathan M. White, Maria Hibner‐Szaltys, Marco Duz, Jonathan M. Withers, Marco Marcatili
{"title":"Effect of breed, obturator type and surgical experience on tenoscopic portal creation into the digital flexor tendon sheath in horses","authors":"Jonathan M. White, Maria Hibner‐Szaltys, Marco Duz, Jonathan M. Withers, Marco Marcatili","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo determine the influence of breed (cob [CB] and non‐cob [NC]), obturator type and surgical experience on the number of attempts, time taken and iatrogenic damage (ID) created when entering the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) tenoscopically.Study designProspective experimental cadaveric study.AnimalsA total of 104 cadaver limbs.MethodsAn equal number of randomly selected CB and NC limbs were operated using a conical obturator (OB) or a switching stick (SS) by one boarded (BS) and one resident surgeon (RS). Skin measurements, number of attempts and time taken to enter the DFTS were recorded. The DFTS was endoscopically examined and then dissected to record ID and cumulative ID calculated.ResultsMean CB skin thickness (8.4 mm) was nearly twice that of NC limbs (4.5 mm) (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001). Mean DFTS entry took longer in CB limbs (133 s) compared to NC limbs (112 s) (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .02). BS mean entry time in CB limbs was 115 s compared to 46 s in NC limbs (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < .001). Cumulative ID was greater in CB limbs (25 of 52 limbs with ID) compared to NC limbs (14 of 52 limbs with ID) (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .04). No difference was noted between obturators. Surgical experience reduced attempts and time entering the DFTS.ConclusionSurgeons take longer to enter DFTS in CB limbs and more cumulative ID is created, regardless of obturator type used.Clinical significanceSkin thickness is a major determinant of time taken to enter the DFTS and increases the risk of ID. Awareness of the challenges in CB limbs is important.","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveTo determine the influence of breed (cob [CB] and non‐cob [NC]), obturator type and surgical experience on the number of attempts, time taken and iatrogenic damage (ID) created when entering the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) tenoscopically.Study designProspective experimental cadaveric study.AnimalsA total of 104 cadaver limbs.MethodsAn equal number of randomly selected CB and NC limbs were operated using a conical obturator (OB) or a switching stick (SS) by one boarded (BS) and one resident surgeon (RS). Skin measurements, number of attempts and time taken to enter the DFTS were recorded. The DFTS was endoscopically examined and then dissected to record ID and cumulative ID calculated.ResultsMean CB skin thickness (8.4 mm) was nearly twice that of NC limbs (4.5 mm) (p < .001). Mean DFTS entry took longer in CB limbs (133 s) compared to NC limbs (112 s) (p = .02). BS mean entry time in CB limbs was 115 s compared to 46 s in NC limbs (p < .001). Cumulative ID was greater in CB limbs (25 of 52 limbs with ID) compared to NC limbs (14 of 52 limbs with ID) (p = .04). No difference was noted between obturators. Surgical experience reduced attempts and time entering the DFTS.ConclusionSurgeons take longer to enter DFTS in CB limbs and more cumulative ID is created, regardless of obturator type used.Clinical significanceSkin thickness is a major determinant of time taken to enter the DFTS and increases the risk of ID. Awareness of the challenges in CB limbs is important.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations.
It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.